SEC

Georgia

22-11NET#31Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #116Coach: Mike White

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,415	1,061	11.8—	119.4—	107.6—	54.2%—	34.7%—	14.3%—	36.3%—	50.8%—	65.2%—	18.2%—	30.5%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	277	132	20.6—	128.1—	107.5—	59.5%—	39.7%—	15.9%—	30.8%—	53.9%—	65.3%—	19.0%—	29.4%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	110	50	11.8—	139.8—	128.0—	57.7%—	40.7%—	10.0%—	56.7%—	57.6%—	58.2%—	15.1%—	30.3%—
AbsonJ. AbsonJamesD. JamesBaileyJ. BaileyMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsJ. Wilkins	93	40	12.5—	103.1—	90.5—	45.5%—	30.6%—	16.1%—	44.2%—	48.8%—	66.7%—	25.9%—	24.7%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilMillenderM. MillenderRossJ. RossCatchingsK. Catchings	79	33	31.8—	124.7—	92.9—	61.4%—	27.3%—	13.9%—	36.4%—	40.6%—	70.5%—	15.9%—	40.6%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilMillenderM. MillenderCatchingsK. CatchingsStaggK. Stagg	76	44	14.7—	127.1—	112.3—	58.2%—	36.6%—	11.9%—	24.7%—	54.0%—	68.4%—	13.9%—	14.7%—
CainB. CainAbsonJ. AbsonJamesD. JamesMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. Wilkinson	62	28	-27.0—	115.6—	142.6—	54.2%—	47.1%—	22.5%—	15.0%—	64.8%—	56.7%—	12.7%—	24.6%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilJamesD. JamesRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. Wilkinson	56	25	27.3—	123.8—	96.6—	48.0%—	48.4%—	10.8%—	62.0%—	43.5%—	64.1%—	18.4%—	17.7%—
CainB. CainAbsonJ. AbsonMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	54	23	42.6—	136.1—	93.5—	59.6%—	34.5%—	9.3%—	26.9%—	40.5%—	68.8%—	14.9%—	40.5%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilJamesD. JamesMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. Wilkinson	51	26	-11.4—	113.9—	125.2—	50.0%—	28.0%—	13.7%—	57.5%—	50.0%—	57.6%—	14.9%—	31.9%—
CainB. CainRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. CatchingsStaggK. Stagg	44	19	-0.7—	110.5—	111.2—	52.4%—	25.0%—	11.3%—	16.7%—	55.0%—	61.9%—	21.4%—	25.0%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonStaggK. Stagg	39	17	25.8—	142.9—	117.1—	75.9%—	16.7%—	15.3%—	44.8%—	45.0%—	52.2%—	10.0%—	37.5%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilBaileyJ. BaileyMillenderM. MillenderCatchingsK. Catchings	37	16	42.4—	136.8—	94.4—	72.6%—	20.0%—	13.4%—	29.0%—	48.1%—	85.7%—	20.4%—	48.1%—
CainB. CainJamesD. JamesRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonStaggK. Stagg	36	14	50.1—	129.7—	79.6—	59.4%—	40.0%—	13.8%—	34.4%—	41.2%—	52.4%—	30.2%—	8.8%—
CainB. CainAbsonJ. AbsonRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	35	15	-33.9—	96.7—	130.6—	48.1%—	40.0%—	22.7%—	48.1%—	60.0%—	72.7%—	12.4%—	52.0%—
CainB. CainCyrilS. CyrilJamesD. JamesBaileyJ. BaileyMillenderM. Millender	35	14	-16.5—	117.6—	134.2—	66.7%—	30.0%—	23.0%—	22.2%—	65.2%—	53.3%—	18.8%—	27.3%—
CainB. CainJamesD. JamesMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonStaggK. Stagg	35	12	19.4—	115.3—	95.9—	51.7%—	6.3%—	0.0%—	40.0%—	52.0%—	75.0%—	24.7%—	28.0%—
CainB. CainMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. CatchingsStaggK. Stagg	34	16	33.8—	148.6—	114.8—	64.7%—	37.5%—	8.7%—	20.6%—	52.8%—	55.0%—	14.3%—	16.7%—
CainB. CainJamesD. JamesMillenderM. MillenderWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	34	14	-10.5—	121.8—	132.4—	44.1%—	45.8%—	11.9%—	41.2%—	56.0%—	64.3%—	16.9%—	80.0%—
CyrilS. CyrilRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. CatchingsWilkinsJ. Wilkins	33	12	-24.0—	107.3—	131.3—	52.0%—	27.8%—	15.3%—	64.0%—	70.8%—	44.4%—	27.5%—	41.7%—
CainB. CainJamesD. JamesRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	32	12	-1.8—	86.9—	88.6—	38.0%—	17.6%—	15.5%—	44.0%—	40.0%—	73.7%—	17.7%—	20.0%—
CyrilS. CyrilMillenderM. MillenderRossJ. RossWilkinsonJ. WilkinsonCatchingsK. Catchings	32	14	45.5—	144.9—	99.4—	58.1%—	47.1%—	12.6%—	32.3%—	52.1%—	90.9%—	19.9%—	45.8%—
CainB. CainAbsonJ. AbsonJamesD. JamesBaileyJ. BaileyMillenderM. Millender	31	16	90.0—	138.9—	48.9—	61.8%—	43.8%—	9.7%—	5.9%—	17.2%—	65.5%—	23.0%—	31.3%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.