Hampton14-16

CAACoach: Ivan Thomas

14-16NET#214

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Noah Farrakhan	1,047	395	72.6%	+2.560	+9.392	+6.716	+1.972	+4.888	−1.470	+4.476	+1.828	+2.676	−3.48	+7.514
Xzavier Long	1,038	404	72.0%	−2.740	−0.150	+2.634	−2.228	+2.878	−0.862	+4.376	+1.038	+6.396	−4.84	−1.156
George Beale Jr.	1,009	433	70.0%	+16.996	+9.792	−7.284	+4.290	+2.372	−1.978	−2.438	−4.990	+4.288	−0.544	+9.98
Kyrese Mullen	764	678	53.0%	+3.766	−5.126	−8.888	−2.922	+2.978	−0.050	−7.414	−2.978	+9.9100	−1.528	+2.336
Daniel Johnson	719	723	49.9%	+14.294	+5.076	−9.390	+2.678	+0.254	−3.290	−4.228	−5.492	+0.758	+3.090	+0.348
Wayne Bristol Jr.	579	862	40.2%	−7.026	−3.034	+3.928	−2.922	−0.448	+2.020	+6.986	+1.632	−7.54	+0.560	−1.458
Etienne Strothers	499	942	34.6%	−2.342	+1.358	+3.530	+1.668	+1.970	+2.120	+9.592	+2.524	−4.812	+0.254	−9.190
Richard Goods	430	1,012	29.8%	−0.150	−3.334	−3.266	−0.346	+0.052	+2.714	−1.542	+0.444	−4.712	+3.090	−12.596
Tyler Rice	367	1,074	25.5%	+5.572	−7.816	−13.396	−2.228	−6.08	−0.658	−5.720	−7.196	−2.626	+4.798	−0.552
Trevor Smith	358	1,083	24.9%	−34.82	−15.54	+19.20	−6.96	−6.08	+2.516	+2.566	+8.70	−2.032	−4.24	+8.210
Eunique Rink	214	1,227	14.9%	−9.120	+0.756	+9.98	+1.870	−1.934	−1.572	−12.54	+8.90	−2.032	+0.152	−18.998
Dan Banister Jr.	106	1,336	7.3%	+28.1100	+23.3100	−4.876	+15.1100	−3.820	−0.252	+6.786	−8.198	+0.456	+3.896	+36.90

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Noah Farrakhan	1,047	395	72.6%	-0.246	109.650	109.842	48.5%36	36.0%70	15.9%56	32.9%58	51.7%44	68.1%46	18.4%60	45.9%16
Xzavier Long	1,038	404	72.0%	-1.644	107.144	108.646	47.4%30	35.4%68	16.0%54	32.9%58	51.4%46	69.2%50	18.0%56	43.5%18
George Beale Jr.	1,009	433	70.0%	4.354	110.052	105.754	49.2%38	35.4%68	15.7%58	31.0%52	49.6%56	68.7%48	19.2%64	46.9%14
Kyrese Mullen	764	678	53.0%	0.948	104.738	103.858	46.7%28	36.0%70	16.2%52	28.3%44	49.7%56	72.1%64	18.6%60	44.9%16
Daniel Johnson	719	723	49.9%	6.358	109.650	103.360	49.3%38	34.8%66	14.6%66	29.7%48	48.4%60	67.7%44	20.9%74	44.0%18
Wayne Bristol Jr.	579	862	40.2%	-5.038	105.340	110.342	46.3%26	34.4%64	17.4%44	35.9%66	52.1%42	63.0%26	19.6%68	43.0%18
Etienne Strothers	499	942	34.6%	-2.344	107.946	110.242	49.1%38	35.9%70	17.6%42	38.0%70	52.7%40	64.3%30	19.4%66	38.0%28
Richard Goods	430	1,012	29.8%	-0.946	104.838	105.754	47.8%32	34.7%66	18.2%38	30.6%52	51.4%46	64.1%30	21.4%78	35.1%34
Tyler Rice	367	1,074	25.5%	3.352	101.332	97.972	46.4%28	30.2%48	15.8%56	27.5%42	45.8%72	65.5%36	22.9%84	43.4%18
Trevor Smith	358	1,083	24.9%	-27.012	95.420	122.416	42.7%16	30.2%48	18.1%38	33.7%60	57.7%20	65.9%38	16.2%42	50.0%12
Eunique Rink	214	1,227	14.9%	-8.632	107.746	116.328	49.5%40	33.1%58	14.9%62	21.2%24	58.6%16	65.7%36	19.4%66	28.0%54
Dan Banister Jr.	106	1,336	7.3%	25.284	128.788	103.558	62.1%90	31.1%52	16.1%54	37.9%70	43.6%80	67.8%44	22.8%84	78.2%0

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Noah Farrakhan	1,047	395	72.6%	-2.742	100.430	103.160	46.6%28	31.2%52	17.2%44	28.5%44	49.8%54	65.6%36	21.8%80	38.4%26
Xzavier Long	1,038	404	72.0%	1.148	107.244	106.152	49.6%40	32.6%58	16.8%48	28.6%46	50.5%50	62.9%26	22.8%84	44.6%16
George Beale Jr.	1,009	433	70.0%	-12.626	100.328	112.934	45.0%22	33.1%58	17.6%42	33.4%60	54.5%32	64.4%32	19.7%68	37.1%28
Kyrese Mullen	764	678	53.0%	-2.842	109.852	112.636	49.6%40	33.1%58	16.2%52	35.8%66	52.7%40	62.2%24	20.1%70	42.6%20
Daniel Johnson	719	723	49.9%	-7.934	104.638	112.536	46.7%28	34.6%64	17.9%40	33.9%60	53.8%34	67.0%42	17.8%56	43.6%18
Wayne Bristol Jr.	579	862	40.2%	2.050	108.348	106.352	49.1%38	34.8%66	15.4%60	29.0%46	50.5%50	70.5%56	19.1%64	44.4%18
Etienne Strothers	499	942	34.6%	-0.046	106.644	106.750	47.5%30	34.0%62	15.5%58	28.6%44	50.3%50	69.1%50	19.3%66	47.1%14
Richard Goods	430	1,012	29.8%	-0.846	108.146	108.944	48.1%34	34.7%66	15.4%60	32.2%56	51.1%48	68.8%50	18.4%60	47.6%14
Tyler Rice	367	1,074	25.5%	-2.244	109.150	111.338	48.6%36	36.2%70	16.4%52	33.2%58	52.9%38	68.1%46	18.1%58	43.9%18
Trevor Smith	358	1,083	24.9%	7.860	111.054	103.260	49.6%40	36.2%70	15.6%58	31.1%54	49.0%58	67.8%44	20.4%72	41.8%20
Eunique Rink	214	1,227	14.9%	0.648	107.044	106.452	47.7%32	34.9%66	16.5%50	33.7%60	49.7%56	67.7%44	19.3%66	46.8%14
Dan Banister Jr.	106	1,336	7.3%	-2.942	105.440	108.346	47.0%30	34.9%66	16.2%52	31.3%54	51.7%44	67.4%42	19.0%64	41.3%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.