Hofstra13-18

CAACoach: Speedy Claxton

13-18NET#208

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cruz Davis	1,558	273	85.1%	+10.486	+15.1100	+4.724	+5.194	+6.996	−1.978	−0.946	+7.32	+2.374	+3.594	+3.032
Jean Aranguren	1,523	308	83.2%	+11.188	+4.172	−7.084	−1.536	+6.796	−2.078	+1.160	−7.898	−1.536	−0.838	+9.58
Michael Graham	1,089	743	59.5%	−11.316	−2.836	+8.510	−1.436	+2.776	+0.444	−4.328	+2.226	+1.566	−4.14	+1.442
German Plotnikov	1,044	787	57.0%	+11.688	+1.962	−9.890	+0.152	+1.968	−0.558	−2.936	−3.382	+2.474	+0.560	−6.782
TJ Gadsden	856	975	46.7%	−4.634	−1.344	+3.232	+0.656	0.052	+2.220	−0.550	+1.830	−3.420	+0.662	−4.072
Khalil Farmer	794	1,038	43.3%	−1.944	+3.370	+5.222	+2.980	−4.614	−2.280	−0.748	+2.424	+0.860	−0.542	+4.028
Silas Sunday	614	1,217	33.5%	+9.384	+2.564	−6.982	+1.062	−0.446	+0.246	+1.160	−1.970	−1.238	+3.090	−5.780
KiJan Robinson	612	1,219	33.4%	−13.712	−6.320	+7.414	−1.238	−1.538	+3.012	+3.572	+2.424	+0.354	−3.110	−2.664
Jaquan Sanders	605	1,227	33.0%	−3.338	−5.822	−2.564	−0.940	−3.124	+3.38	+6.886	−1.566	−2.130	+2.386	+3.430
Joshua DeCady	249	1,582	13.6%	−5.332	−8.712	−3.468	−4.712	−5.610	−3.392	−1.742	+0.148	+1.466	+1.372	+7.114
Eric Parnell	212	1,619	11.6%	+9.484	+4.676	−4.876	−1.238	−0.150	−5.096	−2.438	−3.784	+0.758	−0.936	−2.162

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cruz Davis	1,558	273	85.1%	1.950	104.940	102.960	50.3%46	30.2%48	17.8%40	25.1%36	46.3%70	68.6%48	17.1%50	39.0%26
Jean Aranguren	1,523	308	83.2%	2.350	103.336	101.066	49.3%38	30.1%48	17.8%40	25.4%36	43.8%78	68.0%46	16.4%44	40.2%24
Michael Graham	1,089	743	59.5%	-4.240	101.532	105.754	49.0%38	30.2%48	18.3%38	23.5%30	46.0%70	68.8%50	14.9%34	39.1%26
German Plotnikov	1,044	787	57.0%	5.356	103.436	98.172	49.6%40	29.9%46	17.9%40	24.0%30	43.7%80	69.2%52	16.8%48	35.7%32
TJ Gadsden	856	975	46.7%	-2.144	101.932	103.958	49.9%40	29.1%44	19.3%30	25.0%34	46.1%70	66.4%38	16.9%48	36.4%30
Khalil Farmer	794	1,038	43.3%	-0.746	104.538	105.254	51.2%48	26.4%32	16.9%48	24.8%34	46.5%68	68.7%48	16.3%44	40.8%22
Silas Sunday	614	1,217	33.5%	6.658	104.238	97.772	50.2%46	28.8%42	18.2%38	25.9%38	43.9%78	67.4%42	18.6%60	34.8%34
KiJan Robinson	612	1,219	33.4%	-8.832	98.426	107.250	48.7%36	28.1%40	20.1%24	27.6%42	46.7%68	68.4%48	14.5%32	36.8%30
Jaquan Sanders	605	1,227	33.0%	-1.844	98.726	100.566	48.9%38	27.0%34	20.3%24	29.9%50	44.1%78	66.8%42	18.1%58	40.8%22
Joshua DeCady	249	1,582	13.6%	-4.140	95.120	99.368	45.5%24	24.3%26	15.3%60	23.8%30	45.3%74	69.4%52	17.7%54	44.8%16
Eric Parnell	212	1,619	11.6%	8.762	106.744	98.072	48.5%36	29.0%42	13.7%72	23.1%28	41.9%84	68.8%50	15.8%40	36.6%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Cruz Davis	1,558	273	85.1%	-8.532	89.712	98.270	45.2%22	23.2%22	19.8%28	26.0%38	39.0%90	66.3%38	13.6%26	36.0%32
Jean Aranguren	1,523	308	83.2%	-8.832	99.228	108.048	50.8%46	23.4%22	19.8%28	24.3%32	51.6%46	69.4%52	17.3%52	30.7%46
Michael Graham	1,089	743	59.5%	7.160	104.238	97.174	50.4%46	27.5%36	17.9%40	27.8%44	43.8%78	67.4%42	19.0%64	37.7%28
German Plotnikov	1,044	787	57.0%	-6.336	101.532	107.848	49.5%40	28.1%40	18.4%36	26.9%40	47.1%66	66.9%42	16.3%44	42.4%20
TJ Gadsden	856	975	46.7%	2.552	103.236	100.766	49.2%38	29.1%44	17.1%46	25.4%36	44.3%76	69.8%54	16.3%44	40.5%22
Khalil Farmer	794	1,038	43.3%	1.248	101.230	100.068	48.3%34	31.1%52	19.1%32	25.5%36	44.1%78	67.9%44	16.8%48	36.8%30
Silas Sunday	614	1,217	33.5%	-2.842	101.832	104.556	49.2%38	29.3%44	18.1%38	24.9%34	45.8%72	68.6%48	15.6%38	40.5%22
KiJan Robinson	612	1,219	33.4%	4.956	104.738	99.868	49.9%40	29.6%44	17.1%46	24.1%32	44.3%76	68.1%46	17.6%54	39.4%24
Jaquan Sanders	605	1,227	33.0%	1.550	104.538	103.160	49.8%40	30.1%48	17.0%46	23.1%28	45.6%72	68.9%50	15.8%40	37.4%28
Joshua DeCady	249	1,582	13.6%	1.148	103.836	102.760	50.2%46	29.9%46	18.6%36	25.5%36	45.1%74	68.0%46	16.4%44	37.6%28
Eric Parnell	212	1,619	11.6%	-0.746	102.132	102.860	49.7%40	29.1%44	18.7%34	25.5%36	45.6%72	68.1%46	16.7%46	38.8%26

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.