Houston32-5

Big 12Coach: Kelvin Sampson

32-5NET#2

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

L.J. Cryer	1,774	438	80.2%	+17.194	+9.490	−7.784	+7.898	−3.722	+0.246	−10.96	−0.554	+0.758	+6.3100	−1.658
Jamal Shead	1,740	472	78.7%	+31.0100	+17.7100	−13.396	+9.2100	−0.250	−3.790	−6.220	−4.588	+2.574	+2.080	−20.798
Emanuel Sharp	1,572	640	71.1%	−13.412	−2.438	+11.16	+0.050	−2.928	+1.032	−0.648	+3.318	−4.414	−1.036	+7.214
J'Wan Roberts	1,455	758	65.8%	+0.050	+4.474	+4.426	+4.288	−1.736	−0.862	−9.710	+3.120	+0.454	−1.430	−3.468
Ja'Vier Francis	1,144	1,069	51.7%	+1.856	−9.212	−11.092	−0.150	−3.720	+2.912	−8.712	−4.084	+5.792	+1.168	−8.688
Damian Dunn	947	1,266	42.8%	−10.618	−6.520	+4.128	−1.930	−2.034	+0.736	+0.956	+3.616	+1.364	−0.740	+1.342
Mylik Wilson	834	1,378	37.7%	−21.74	−9.712	+12.04	−4.910	−3.224	+0.540	+10.894	+1.830	−5.610	−3.210	+8.112
Joseph Tugler	660	1,552	29.8%	+12.488	+8.588	−4.070	−1.140	+7.996	−2.280	+1.962	−1.160	−2.032	+3.390	+3.828
Ramon Walker Jr.	414	1,798	18.7%	+3.464	+0.754	−2.764	−4.114	+6.694	+1.132	+21.5100	−3.380	+1.970	−2.220	+8.312
Terrance Arceneaux	256	1,957	11.5%	+23.6100	+12.996	−10.692	−3.418	+12.8100	−2.482	+6.986	−4.586	−4.712	+6.8100	−1.054
Cedric Lath	195	2,018	8.8%	−23.94	−16.64	+7.314	−7.24	−5.610	+0.048	−2.936	+0.050	+4.186	−10.32	+6.418

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

L.J. Cryer	1,774	438	80.2%	27.888	117.672	89.884	51.6%52	37.9%78	13.9%68	27.6%44	44.0%78	66.5%38	25.7%92	38.5%24
Jamal Shead	1,740	472	78.7%	31.190	119.574	88.586	52.0%54	38.7%80	13.0%74	28.5%46	43.2%80	66.9%42	24.8%90	34.6%32
Emanuel Sharp	1,572	640	71.1%	20.580	115.166	94.678	50.1%46	37.8%78	14.1%68	29.6%50	45.1%74	65.0%34	24.1%88	41.0%20
J'Wan Roberts	1,455	758	65.8%	24.484	117.370	92.880	51.5%52	38.1%78	13.5%70	26.5%40	45.2%74	66.5%38	23.9%88	37.7%26
Ja'Vier Francis	1,144	1,069	51.7%	25.384	111.356	86.190	50.0%46	36.8%74	15.2%58	25.6%38	42.2%84	69.1%50	24.9%90	34.7%32
Damian Dunn	947	1,266	42.8%	18.478	112.158	93.778	49.0%40	37.6%78	14.3%66	30.3%52	46.2%68	67.0%42	24.0%88	39.6%22
Mylik Wilson	834	1,378	37.7%	11.066	109.752	98.868	47.0%32	36.7%74	14.1%68	36.7%68	45.2%74	62.8%26	22.4%82	43.8%16
Joseph Tugler	660	1,552	29.8%	33.292	121.778	88.586	49.3%42	44.1%92	12.3%78	31.1%54	43.3%80	64.9%34	26.7%94	41.6%20
Ramon Walker Jr.	414	1,798	18.7%	27.286	116.368	89.186	46.7%30	44.0%92	14.7%62	47.4%84	41.4%86	67.8%44	22.6%84	45.6%14
Terrance Arceneaux	256	1,957	11.5%	45.296	127.288	82.092	47.1%32	49.5%98	11.7%82	35.8%66	40.1%88	62.2%24	30.4%98	38.0%24
Cedric Lath	195	2,018	8.8%	2.752	100.630	98.070	43.5%18	33.6%62	13.9%68	27.2%42	44.1%78	70.0%54	15.0%36	44.7%16

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

L.J. Cryer	1,774	438	80.2%	10.766	108.248	97.572	43.8%20	41.6%86	13.7%70	38.6%70	44.5%76	65.8%36	19.3%66	40.1%22
Jamal Shead	1,740	472	78.7%	0.146	101.934	101.862	42.8%16	38.9%80	16.7%48	34.7%62	47.7%62	64.4%32	22.8%84	55.3%6
Emanuel Sharp	1,572	640	71.1%	34.092	117.470	83.592	50.1%46	40.7%84	13.1%74	30.3%52	41.7%84	69.4%52	25.1%90	33.8%34
J'Wan Roberts	1,455	758	65.8%	24.484	112.960	88.586	47.3%32	39.8%82	14.4%66	36.2%66	42.1%84	66.1%36	25.3%92	41.1%20
Ja'Vier Francis	1,144	1,069	51.7%	23.584	120.576	97.072	50.1%46	40.6%84	12.4%78	34.2%62	46.2%68	63.4%28	23.8%88	43.3%18
Damian Dunn	947	1,266	42.8%	29.088	118.572	89.684	50.9%48	39.6%82	13.5%70	29.4%48	42.6%82	65.8%36	24.7%90	38.3%24
Mylik Wilson	834	1,378	37.7%	32.790	119.474	86.888	51.8%54	39.9%82	13.6%70	25.9%38	43.4%80	68.5%48	25.6%92	35.7%30
Joseph Tugler	660	1,552	29.8%	20.880	113.260	92.580	50.4%48	36.2%72	14.5%64	29.2%48	44.4%76	66.9%42	23.4%86	37.8%26
Ramon Walker Jr.	414	1,798	18.7%	23.884	115.666	91.882	50.8%48	37.4%76	13.6%70	25.9%38	44.7%76	65.9%36	24.8%90	37.3%26
Terrance Arceneaux	256	1,957	11.5%	21.782	114.364	92.680	50.5%48	36.7%74	14.1%68	28.9%48	44.6%76	66.9%42	23.6%88	39.0%24
Cedric Lath	195	2,018	8.8%	26.686	117.270	90.784	50.7%48	39.2%82	13.8%70	30.1%50	44.1%78	65.9%36	25.3%92	38.3%24

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.