Team Stats
38 games- Net Rating12.589
- Offensive Rating116.269
- Defensive Rating103.887
- Pace69.391
- Effective FG%57.2%97
- Off Rebound Pct28.9%53
- Turnover Pct17.1%90
- FT Attempt Rate27.4%7
Team Stats
38 gamesCore Stats
- Net Rating12.589
- Offensive Rating116.269
- Defensive Rating103.887
- Pace69.391
- Effective FG%57.2%97
- Off Rebound Pct28.9%53
- Turnover Pct17.1%90
- FT Attempt Rate27.4%7
Results & Margin
- Win Pct78.9%97
- Point Margin / Game8.692
- Points / Game80.592
- Points Allowed / Game71.958
- 1st Half Margin5.893
- 2nd Half Margin2.883
- Avg Largest Lead16.092
- Avg Largest Deficit6.690
Box Score
- Points / Game80.592
- Rebounds / Game35.253
- Assists / Game16.495
- ORebs / Game9.638
- DRebs / Game25.664
- Steals / Game6.568
- Blocks / Game4.078
- Turnovers / Game11.878
- PFs / Game15.495
Shooting
- FGMs / Game29.597
- FGAs / Game60.278
- Field Goal Pct49.0%96
- 2PMs / Game19.780
- 2PAs / Game35.541
- 2-Point Pct55.6%95
- 3PMs / Game9.894
- 3PAs / Game24.783
- 3-Point Pct39.7%95
- FTMs / Game11.715
- FTAs / Game16.513
- Free Throw Pct70.8%43
Scoring Breakdown
- % Pts from 2s49.0%44
- % Pts from 3s36.5%84
- % Pts from FTs14.5%1
- Paint Pts / Game6.92
- % Pts in Paint8.6%2
- Fast Break Pts / Game1.23
- % Pts on Fast Break1.5%3
- Points off TOVs / Game2.11
- % Pts off TOVs2.6%1
- 1st Half Pts / Game39.496
- 2nd Half Pts / Game40.886
Adv Offense
- True Shooting %59.7%95
- Points / Shot1.3486
- 3-Point Att Rate41.0%76
- Assist Pct55.4%74
- Assists / 100 Poss23.680
- Ast/Tov Ratio1.39x94
- PF Drawn / Game17.024
Opponent Shooting
- Opp Effective FG%49.3%75
- Opp True Shooting %52.5%84
- Opp Field Goal Pct42.8%75
- Opp 2-Point Pct49.0%60
- Opp 3-Point Pct33.1%82
- Opp 3PA Rate39.0%33
- Opp FT Att Rate24.8%97
- Opp Points / Shot1.1693
Defense Allowed
- Points Allowed / Game71.958
- Paint Pts Allowed4.799
- Fast Break Pts Allowed0.598
- Pts off TOVs Allowed1.299
- Opp Assist Pct48.6%78
- TOVs Forced / Game12.952
Adv Defense
- Def Rebound Pct68.8%19
- Turnovers Forced Pct18.6%31
- Steal Pct9.4%50
- Block Pct5.8%68
- Hakeem Pct15.2%60
- PF Efficiency0.91x83
- Steals / PF0.42x92
- Blocks / PF0.26x90
Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.
Where They Rank
of 351 D-I teams- #1SOS12.9
- #7Adj ORtg120.3
- #10eFG%57.2%
- #15Pts Diff+328
- #173P%39.7%
- #18TS%59.2%
- #323PM Diff+69
- #35Adj DRtg98.1
- #1SOS12.9
- #7Adj ORtg120.3
- #10eFG%57.2%
- #15Pts Diff+328
- #173P%39.7%
- #18TS%59.2%
- #323PM Diff+69
- #35Adj DRtg98.1
- #325FTAR27.4%
- #282Opp OREB%31.2%
- #176Opp TOV%18.6%
- #172REB Diff+1
- #165OREB%28.9%
- #91AST%55.4%
- #87Opp eFG%49.3%
- #67TOV%17.1%
Most Similar Seasons
to 2017-18- 1

Oklahoma 2015-1629-8Big 12Most alike in Tempo, Opp TOV%, Adj O89 - 2

Iowa St. 2018-1923-12Big 12Most alike in Adj D, OREB%, Opp TOV%87 - 3

Iowa St. 2016-1724-11Big 12Most alike in Opp OREB%, Opp eFG%, 3PA rate80 - 4

Marquette 2016-1719-13Big EastMost alike in Adj O, Opp TOV%, Tempo80 - 5

Syracuse 2020-2118-10ACCMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp eFG%, OREB%79 - 6

Iowa 2015-1622-11Big 10Most alike in Opp eFG%, Adj D, Tempo79 - 7

Creighton 2020-2122-9Big EastMost alike in Adj D, FT rate, Tempo78 - 8

Creighton 2019-2023-7Big EastMost alike in eFG%, Opp OREB%, Adj O78 - 9

Michigan St. 2013-1429-9Big 10Most alike in 3PA rate, FT rate, Adj O77 - 10

Notre Dame 2016-1726-10ACCMost alike in Opp TOV%, Adj O, FT rate76
| D. GrahamDevonte' Graham | Sr | 6'2" | +3.1100 | – | – | 57.5%67 | 25.2%89 | 17.3 | 4.0 | 7.2 | 40.6% | 82.7% |
| U. AzubuikeUdoka Azubuike | So | 7'0" | +2.499 | – | – | 72.6%95 | 22.2%77 | 13.0 | 7.0 | 0.7 | 0.0% | 41.7% |
| M. NewmanMalik Newman | So | 6'3" | +2.198 | – | – | 61.1%80 | 19.7%62 | 14.2 | 5.0 | 2.1 | 41.5% | 83.5% |
| S. MykhailiukSviatoslav Mykhailiuk | Sr | 6'8" | +2.097 | – | – | 57.4%66 | 20.1%65 | 14.6 | 3.9 | 2.7 | 44.4% | 80.4% |
| L. VickLagerald Vick | Jr | 6'5" | +1.592 | – | – | 57.7%67 | 17.7%47 | 12.1 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 37.3% | 67.3% |
| M. GarrettMarcus Garrett | Fr | 6'5" | +1.491 | – | – | 50.8%33 | 13.3%19 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 26.7% | 49.0% |
| C. YoungClay Young | Sr | 6'5" | – | – | – | 41.4%11 | 10.6%9 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 0.0% | 50.0% |
| M. LightfootMitch Lightfoot | So | 6'8" | – | – | – | 62.1%83 | 14.3%24 | 3.8 | 3.1 | 0.3 | 35.3% | 72.0% |
| S. CunliffeSam Cunliffe | So | 6'6" | – | – | – | 54.1%48 | 19.8%62 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| C. TeahanChris Teahan | Fr | 6'4" | – | – | – | 50.5%32 | 28.9%96 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 25.0% | 100.0% |
| J. SosinskiJames Sosinski | So | 6'7" | – | – | – | 100.0%98 | 10.7%9 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| S. De SousaSilvio De Sousa | Fr | 6'9" | – | – | – | 70.2%94 | 23.2%82 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 0.0% | 71.4% |
| Ratings (ADJUSTED) | Four Factors | Shooting | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-11 | #24 | 21.294 | 116.782 | 95.598 | 15.399 | +8168 | -3227 | 29.2%31 | +4320 | 51.2%42 | 34.6%59 | 76.7%91 | |
| 21-13 | #22 | 20.894 | 115.484 | 94.798 | 14.297 | +13082 | -841 | 30.5%51 | +3127 | 53.1%75 | 35.4%73 | 71.6%42 | |
| 23-11 | #29 | 16.192 | 113.283 | 97.294 | 11.598 | +8171 | -944 | 25.6%19 | +243 | 53.8%84 | 33.2%36 | 72.1%52 | |
| 28-8 | #9 | 21.098 | 114.793 | 93.797 | 12.4100 | +3953 | +2160 | 28.7%45 | -7185 | 52.6%75 | 34.7%57 | 72.0%53 | |
| 34-6 | #4 | 25.299 | 119.199 | 93.996 | 12.6100 | +19189 | +3668 | 32.9%87 | -2358 | 53.8%89 | 36.1%85 | 71.7%52 | |
| 28-3 | #1 | 27.3100 | 114.697 | 87.3100 | 10.799 | +20595 | -3026 | 32.8%89 | -1155 | 54.1%92 | 34.4%66 | 66.7%13 | |
| 26-10 | #20 | 18.995 | 112.589 | 93.696 | 13.8100 | +11578 | -4920 | 30.1%66 | +1739 | 52.6%69 | 35.0%58 | 70.5%49 | |
| 31-8 | #9 | 22.298 | 120.798 | 98.591 | 12.9100 | +144 | +6985 | 28.9%48 | -4071 | 57.2%97 | 39.7%95 | 70.8%43 | |
| 31-5 | #9 | 25.498 | 120.899 | 95.493 | 12.699 | +15887 | +5079 | 34.1%88 | -2763 | 56.1%96 | 40.4%99 | 67.8%24 | |
| 32-5 | #4 | 27.299 | 119.498 | 92.298 | 11.298 | +20991 | +7189 | 32.5%75 | -1657 | 56.4%98 | 41.8%99 | 71.3%65 | |
| 27-9 | #15 | 20.196 | 112.993 | 92.895 | 13.5100 | +13883 | +351 | 34.9%83 | +4224 | 49.4%51 | 37.9%86 | 72.4%80 | |
| 25-10 | #9 | 22.798 | 119.098 | 96.393 | 12.4100 | +26398 | -3031 | 37.3%93 | +6713 | 54.2%93 | 34.0%46 | 71.1%61 | |
Loading shot locations…
Shooting
vs D-IShot Profile
vs D-IShot Clock
19 gamesA full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.
Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 351 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.
No lineup data for 17-18. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.
No on/off data for 17-18. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.






