Longwood18-14

Big SouthCoach: Griff Aldrich

18-14NET#166

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Walyn Napper	991	195	83.5%	−13.112	−7.816	+5.222	−8.24	+0.758	−3.792	−3.830	+8.42	−0.050	+2.282	−3.568
Michael Christmas	891	295	75.1%	+15.292	+6.080	−9.288	+3.786	+1.364	−2.684	−17.22	−5.390	+7.398	−2.220	+0.646
Jesper Granlund	806	380	67.9%	+8.780	+3.166	−5.676	+1.768	+0.656	−2.078	−2.438	−2.876	−0.942	+1.066	−13.696
D'Avian Houston	755	431	63.7%	−20.36	−6.620	+13.74	+2.878	−5.412	+4.64	−4.428	+4.810	−2.428	−2.220	+8.810
Johnathan Massie	709	477	59.8%	−5.830	−2.438	+3.432	−3.418	−1.240	−0.962	+1.660	+0.742	+0.960	−1.726	−0.150
Szymon Zapala	550	636	46.4%	+8.278	−2.438	−10.692	+1.262	+1.060	+3.210	−0.350	−7.296	−0.250	−1.922	−18.898
Elijah Tucker	479	707	40.4%	−15.510	−0.846	+14.72	−3.120	−0.150	−2.482	−2.936	+10.00	−5.710	+2.584	+6.120
Emanuel Richards	427	758	36.0%	+7.978	+0.552	−7.484	−2.228	−0.648	+1.526	+21.7100	−3.380	−6.08	+5.8100	+12.24
Johan Nziemi	145	1,041	12.2%	+18.896	+10.092	−8.888	+6.796	−5.014	−3.388	+4.878	−4.084	+13.9100	−2.220	+19.60

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Walyn Napper	991	195	83.5%	1.850	108.348	106.550	48.0%36	41.7%88	18.8%34	35.7%66	55.9%26	71.7%62	21.4%78	35.3%32
Michael Christmas	891	295	75.1%	7.860	111.156	103.358	50.1%46	42.0%88	18.7%34	32.2%56	53.1%36	73.5%70	20.5%74	36.0%30
Jesper Granlund	806	380	67.9%	6.758	110.654	103.956	49.8%42	41.8%88	18.7%34	35.5%64	53.6%34	71.4%60	21.4%78	31.7%40
D'Avian Houston	755	431	63.7%	-3.540	107.246	110.738	50.3%46	39.5%82	21.0%20	34.6%62	56.2%24	70.8%58	20.3%72	39.1%22
Johnathan Massie	709	477	59.8%	1.650	108.750	107.048	47.9%36	41.1%86	19.1%32	36.9%68	54.7%30	72.0%64	20.4%72	35.8%30
Szymon Zapala	550	636	46.4%	8.462	108.348	99.966	49.9%42	42.1%88	21.1%20	36.1%66	50.8%48	71.6%62	20.1%70	26.2%58
Elijah Tucker	479	707	40.4%	-5.338	109.150	114.430	47.4%34	41.5%86	17.9%40	34.6%62	60.5%12	68.2%46	22.6%84	39.5%22
Emanuel Richards	427	758	36.0%	9.062	110.052	100.964	47.8%34	41.3%86	20.4%24	50.5%88	52.3%40	67.9%44	24.8%90	43.9%16
Johan Nziemi	145	1,041	12.2%	20.480	118.472	98.070	55.2%68	37.2%76	16.5%50	40.5%74	50.9%46	83.8%96	19.2%66	53.3%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Walyn Napper	991	195	83.5%	14.972	116.268	101.364	56.2%72	41.0%86	22.5%14	39.5%72	47.5%64	71.7%62	19.2%66	38.8%24
Michael Christmas	891	295	75.1%	-7.434	105.140	112.634	46.4%30	40.6%84	21.4%20	49.4%86	58.4%16	66.2%38	22.7%84	35.4%30
Jesper Granlund	806	380	67.9%	-2.042	107.546	109.542	48.1%36	41.2%86	20.8%22	37.9%70	56.4%22	72.3%66	20.4%72	45.3%14
D'Avian Houston	755	431	63.7%	16.874	113.862	97.074	47.5%34	44.9%92	16.5%50	39.0%72	51.4%44	73.2%70	22.5%82	30.3%44
Johnathan Massie	709	477	59.8%	7.560	111.056	103.658	51.3%50	42.4%88	19.9%26	35.3%64	54.1%32	71.1%60	22.1%82	35.9%30
Szymon Zapala	550	636	46.4%	0.246	110.754	110.540	48.7%38	41.2%86	17.9%40	36.4%66	58.0%18	71.8%62	21.9%80	45.0%16
Elijah Tucker	479	707	40.4%	10.364	109.952	99.766	50.6%48	41.7%86	20.4%24	37.5%68	50.5%48	73.8%72	20.1%70	33.4%34
Emanuel Richards	427	758	36.0%	1.148	109.452	108.346	50.0%42	41.8%88	18.9%34	28.9%48	55.6%26	73.9%72	19.0%64	31.7%40
Johan Nziemi	145	1,041	12.2%	1.648	108.448	106.848	48.5%38	42.2%88	19.8%28	35.7%66	54.9%28	69.9%54	21.4%78	33.6%34

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.