Louisiana11-21

Sun BeltCoach: Bob Marlin

11-21NET#327

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Garnett	1,773	283	86.2%	+15.594	+1.460	−14.196	−2.922	−2.826	−3.894	+5.280	−3.482	+6.196	+4.196	+5.322
Mostapha El Moutaouakkil	1,320	735	64.2%	+12.690	+4.374	−8.488	+2.878	−0.250	+0.738	+2.968	−1.060	−1.634	+5.3100	−12.996
Christian Wright	1,288	767	62.7%	+0.754	+5.680	+4.924	+4.188	−2.132	−1.166	−1.840	+1.038	−1.338	−1.528	−6.080
Kyran Ratliff	1,019	1,037	49.6%	−1.446	−3.134	−1.758	−0.546	+1.262	+0.836	−2.836	−1.668	−0.348	+0.764	−9.892
Michael Thomas	941	1,114	45.8%	−8.422	−9.212	−0.754	−3.120	−0.250	+2.912	+1.058	+1.632	−1.932	+2.486	+5.818
Kyndall Davis	857	1,199	41.7%	−0.548	+2.666	+3.132	+1.668	+0.556	+0.146	−3.134	+1.236	+1.768	−0.346	+8.012
Brandon Hardy	824	1,231	40.1%	+7.478	+4.676	−2.864	+1.162	−1.340	−2.282	+0.858	−1.162	+2.978	−1.232	+0.746
Zeke Cook	724	1,332	35.2%	−2.542	−5.622	−3.166	−3.418	−3.124	−0.150	+1.360	+0.148	+5.594	−1.526	+4.326
London Fields	591	1,464	28.8%	−10.518	−2.438	+8.012	−3.020	+1.162	−1.166	−2.140	+2.028	−1.536	−3.012	−2.262
Chancellor White	418	1,638	20.3%	−6.926	+2.364	+9.210	+0.556	+4.688	+0.048	−4.924	+0.938	−3.520	−2.812	+12.44
Jeremiah Evans	403	1,652	19.6%	+3.264	−0.746	−3.970	+0.050	+2.674	+1.428	+3.672	−2.272	−3.618	+0.560	−4.372

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Garnett	1,773	283	86.2%	-9.630	100.028	109.644	45.4%24	28.4%40	16.0%54	30.7%52	50.7%50	62.9%26	20.3%72	45.0%16
Mostapha El Moutaouakkil	1,320	735	64.2%	-7.334	101.432	108.746	46.9%28	28.7%42	16.7%48	31.1%54	50.8%50	61.4%22	21.6%78	39.6%24
Christian Wright	1,288	767	62.7%	-11.528	101.932	113.434	47.4%30	28.0%38	16.1%54	29.3%48	51.5%46	61.6%22	19.2%64	42.0%20
Kyran Ratliff	1,019	1,037	49.6%	-12.526	98.326	110.740	45.6%24	29.4%44	16.9%48	28.6%46	50.4%50	61.9%22	20.1%70	39.2%24
Michael Thomas	941	1,114	45.8%	-16.322	94.920	111.238	44.2%20	28.7%42	18.1%38	30.6%52	52.1%42	61.0%20	21.0%76	47.3%14
Kyndall Davis	857	1,199	41.7%	-12.028	101.332	113.434	46.8%28	29.1%44	16.6%50	28.2%44	51.9%44	63.1%26	19.6%68	48.9%12
Brandon Hardy	824	1,231	40.1%	-7.334	102.634	109.942	46.5%28	28.0%38	15.2%60	30.5%52	50.5%50	63.8%30	19.0%64	44.6%16
Zeke Cook	724	1,332	35.2%	-13.526	96.222	109.644	43.6%18	26.8%34	16.4%50	30.9%52	51.2%48	65.6%36	18.8%62	46.9%14
London Fields	591	1,464	28.8%	-19.218	98.124	117.326	43.7%18	29.6%44	15.7%56	28.5%44	52.6%40	61.0%20	17.6%54	42.6%20
Chancellor White	418	1,638	20.3%	-17.320	101.732	119.022	46.2%26	32.4%56	16.5%50	26.2%38	51.9%44	59.3%16	17.5%52	54.1%8
Jeremiah Evans	403	1,652	19.6%	-9.232	99.228	108.546	45.9%26	30.9%50	17.6%42	33.0%58	49.4%56	59.2%16	20.1%70	40.7%22

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Kentrell Garnett	1,773	283	86.2%	-25.114	98.626	123.716	48.4%34	31.3%52	19.8%26	25.5%36	54.0%34	56.9%12	16.2%44	39.7%24
Mostapha El Moutaouakkil	1,320	735	64.2%	-19.918	97.122	117.026	44.1%20	28.9%42	16.0%54	28.2%44	51.8%44	63.1%26	16.3%44	52.5%10
Christian Wright	1,288	767	62.7%	-12.328	96.322	108.646	43.3%18	30.1%48	17.2%44	31.2%54	50.6%50	62.8%26	20.6%74	47.9%14
Kyran Ratliff	1,019	1,037	49.6%	-11.128	101.432	112.436	46.1%26	28.2%40	16.1%54	31.4%54	52.0%44	62.2%24	19.4%66	49.0%12
Michael Thomas	941	1,114	45.8%	-7.934	104.038	111.936	47.2%30	28.9%42	15.2%60	29.6%48	50.4%50	62.9%26	18.6%60	41.5%20
Kyndall Davis	857	1,199	41.7%	-11.628	98.826	110.342	45.2%22	28.6%42	16.4%50	31.3%54	50.7%50	61.3%20	19.8%68	40.9%22
Brandon Hardy	824	1,231	40.1%	-14.724	98.024	112.734	45.4%24	29.3%44	17.4%44	29.7%48	51.6%46	60.9%20	20.2%72	43.9%18
Zeke Cook	724	1,332	35.2%	-10.930	101.832	112.734	47.0%30	29.9%46	16.5%50	29.6%48	51.1%48	60.1%18	20.3%72	42.6%20
London Fields	591	1,464	28.8%	-8.832	100.530	109.344	46.7%28	28.5%40	16.8%48	30.7%52	50.6%50	62.5%24	20.6%74	44.8%16
Chancellor White	418	1,638	20.3%	-10.430	99.428	109.842	45.7%24	27.8%38	16.5%50	31.1%54	51.0%48	62.7%26	20.3%72	41.7%20
Jeremiah Evans	403	1,652	19.6%	-12.428	100.028	112.436	45.8%26	28.3%40	16.2%52	29.3%48	51.6%46	62.8%26	19.6%68	45.0%16

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.