Louisville27-8

ACCCoach: Pat Kelsey

27-8NET#26

Poss2,306

Net Rtg14.370

ORtg115.966

DRtg101.664

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,306	1,106	14.370	115.966	101.664	52.9%58	35.0%66	16.5%50	33.8%60	49.4%56	70.7%58	19.0%64	27.1%56
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnSmithR. Smith	381	186	21.080	120.276	99.270	55.4%68	28.5%40	13.6%72	36.2%66	48.3%60	68.0%46	20.6%74	20.2%76
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. Waterman	240	127	20.080	114.362	94.378	57.9%78	32.1%56	18.8%34	27.6%42	47.0%66	81.4%92	15.5%38	16.8%86
HadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. WatermanSmithR. Smith	144	70	0.246	116.568	116.328	47.1%30	32.0%54	8.3%94	36.7%68	58.5%18	77.3%84	14.4%30	45.3%16
TraoreA. TraoreHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnSmithR. Smith	81	40	47.598	136.396	88.986	67.9%96	37.1%74	19.7%28	35.8%66	44.3%76	73.5%70	19.4%66	12.7%92
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyHepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. WatermanSmithR. Smith	78	35	11.566	114.362	102.860	52.2%54	43.2%90	20.5%22	36.2%66	46.9%66	67.4%42	18.8%62	44.6%16
HadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsSmithR. Smith	77	36	15.974	116.868	100.866	62.3%90	27.0%34	18.2%38	26.2%38	53.0%38	69.4%52	21.8%80	7.6%96
ScottJ. ScottTraoreA. TraoreHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. Hepburn	74	34	6.158	117.470	111.338	50.0%40	43.2%90	22.9%12	64.3%96	51.4%46	69.0%50	13.9%28	23.3%68
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. Rooths	74	36	-25.712	80.26	105.952	37.9%8	27.3%36	21.7%18	25.8%36	51.6%46	63.2%26	22.8%84	25.0%64
HadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsWatermanN. Waterman	59	28	-41.34	96.222	137.54	41.7%14	17.9%10	3.4%98	15.0%10	50.0%54	51.3%4	10.1%10	41.5%20
ScottJ. ScottEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsSmithR. Smith	53	25	15.172	120.676	105.554	55.4%68	37.9%76	18.8%34	37.0%68	53.6%36	82.1%94	15.9%42	26.2%60
HadleyJ. HadleyHepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsWatermanN. WatermanSmithR. Smith	50	21	1.550	95.820	94.378	40.9%12	29.4%44	16.0%54	38.6%72	51.4%46	61.9%22	29.4%98	33.3%38
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.RoothsK. RoothsSmithR. Smith	45	20	38.594	102.734	64.198	58.8%82	16.7%8	22.3%14	23.5%30	32.9%96	82.8%94	22.1%80	31.4%44
HadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.RoothsK. RoothsWatermanN. WatermanSmithR. Smith	45	24	17.576	136.396	118.922	66.3%96	31.6%52	13.4%72	25.0%34	53.3%36	81.5%92	4.3%2	20.0%78
ScottJ. ScottEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsWatermanN. Waterman	44	20	14.972	113.360	98.470	63.2%92	44.0%90	31.7%0	44.1%80	48.8%58	75.0%76	18.8%62	25.0%64
ScottJ. ScottHadleyJ. HadleyHepburnC. HepburnRoothsK. RoothsSmithR. Smith	44	22	34.092	148.7100	114.830	67.9%96	43.5%90	13.7%70	28.6%46	58.3%18	81.8%94	14.3%30	19.0%80
TraoreA. TraoreHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. Waterman	43	23	-14.724	115.464	130.18	57.5%76	31.8%54	16.2%54	17.5%14	58.3%18	80.0%90	6.3%4	33.3%38
ScottJ. ScottTraoreA. TraoreEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnSmithR. Smith	42	19	11.466	114.162	102.660	47.4%30	39.3%80	14.3%68	43.6%80	41.9%84	73.1%68	10.8%12	61.3%4
HadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. WatermanPryorK. Pryor	42	21	39.194	112.056	72.996	51.1%48	42.3%88	16.7%48	4.4%2	43.8%80	85.7%98	29.6%98	12.5%92
ScottJ. ScottTraoreA. TraoreHadleyJ. HadleyHepburnC. HepburnSmithR. Smith	34	18	17.576	140.898	123.416	52.9%58	43.5%90	5.9%98	50.0%86	65.7%4	66.7%38	19.4%66	20.0%78
ScottJ. ScottTraoreA. TraoreHadleyJ. HadleyEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.SmithR. Smith	33	18	28.288	122.078	93.878	53.0%58	55.0%100	21.3%20	24.2%32	50.0%54	90.0%100	13.0%22	15.2%88
ScottJ. ScottEdwards Jr.T. Edwards Jr.HepburnC. HepburnWatermanN. WatermanSmithR. Smith	30	13	48.698	109.450	60.798	46.0%26	38.9%78	19.9%26	52.0%88	23.9%98	78.9%88	25.6%92	39.1%24

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.