Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
ACC
Louisville logo

Louisville

27-8NET#26Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #142Coach: Pat Kelsey
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Chucky Hepburn−2.6−1.6+1.0−3.3−1.1−0.9+13.2−0.2−1.2+0.4−6.6
J'Vonne Hadley+5.0+5.9+0.9+5.1−3.4−2.1−7.8+2.0+3.4−2.0−14.3
Terrence Edwards Jr.+9.8−1.4−11.1+1.6−5.7−1.3−4.5−6.5+8.9−4.6−7.9
Reyne Smith+13.4+14.6+1.2+4.9+0.6−4.0+2.7+2.9−0.6+2.2+0.1
James Scott+3.7+2.2−1.4+6.2−0.3+4.4+1.4−2.0+0.9−1.5−2.2
Noah Waterman−10.6−5.4+5.1−2.9+0.7−0.5−7.6+2.2+2.7−2.0+6.7
Khani Rooths−8.0−8.4−0.4−3.0−2.6+0.6−3.3+0.8−0.4+1.0+1.1
Aboubacar Traore−5.8+0.6+6.5−2.2+3.2+0.2+5.1+3.0−0.1−1.2+3.0
Kasean Pryor+20.6+10.5−10.0+2.6+7.4+0.9+7.0−0.6−6.3+10.0−3.4
Frank Anselem-Ibe−6.7−19.7−13.0−17.2+4.3−2.3−1.1−8.4−2.2+1.9+9.0

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Chucky Hepburn13.9115.6101.752.4%34.8%16.4%35.9%49.4%70.5%19.0%26.1%
J'Vonne Hadley15.2116.9101.753.8%34.3%16.2%32.5%49.7%71.3%18.6%24.7%
Terrence Edwards Jr.16.1115.699.553.2%33.9%16.3%33.0%48.2%72.2%18.1%25.7%
Reyne Smith18.7120.6102.054.5%35.2%15.2%34.7%50.4%70.5%19.7%27.2%
James Scott15.8116.8101.055.5%34.8%18.3%34.4%48.6%71.0%18.4%26.2%
Noah Waterman8.6113.0104.351.4%35.3%16.2%29.8%50.6%72.1%17.9%30.8%
Khani Rooths8.9110.2101.350.9%33.3%16.9%31.6%49.9%70.4%19.7%27.9%
Aboubacar Traore9.9116.4106.551.2%37.5%16.7%37.7%51.7%70.6%18.0%29.4%
Kasean Pryor32.4125.292.755.2%41.5%17.3%40.0%48.9%65.2%27.8%24.1%
Frank Anselem-Ibe7.997.289.336.8%38.9%14.3%32.8%41.5%68.6%20.7%35.6%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Chucky Hepburn16.5117.2100.755.7%35.9%17.3%22.7%49.5%71.7%18.6%32.7%
J'Vonne Hadley10.2111.0100.848.7%37.6%18.3%40.3%47.7%67.9%20.6%39.0%
Terrence Edwards Jr.6.4117.0110.651.6%39.5%17.6%37.5%54.8%63.3%22.7%33.6%
Reyne Smith5.3106.1100.849.6%34.5%19.2%32.0%47.5%71.1%17.5%27.1%
James Scott12.1114.5102.449.3%35.1%13.9%33.0%50.6%70.2%19.8%28.5%
Noah Waterman19.2118.499.254.3%34.6%16.8%37.5%48.4%69.5%19.9%24.1%
Khani Rooths16.9118.6101.753.9%35.9%16.3%34.9%49.2%70.8%18.6%26.8%
Aboubacar Traore15.7115.7100.053.4%34.2%16.5%32.7%48.7%70.7%19.3%26.4%
Kasean Pryor11.9114.6102.852.6%34.1%16.4%33.0%49.5%71.5%17.8%27.5%
Frank Anselem-Ibe14.6116.9102.454.0%34.6%16.6%33.9%49.9%70.8%18.9%26.6%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.