SEC

LSU

17-16NET#102Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #89Coach: Matt McMahon

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,117	993	3.6—	110.0—	106.4—	52.6%—	32.8%—	18.7%—	38.3%—	49.2%—	67.3%—	18.0%—	33.3%—
FountainD. FountainWardT. WardBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. Hannibal	183	96	-6.4—	111.1—	117.5—	47.2%—	40.0%—	14.8%—	28.1%—	54.1%—	61.3%—	18.3%—	36.3%—
ReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightCookJ. Cook	112	52	9.9—	102.8—	93.0—	49.0%—	32.8%—	17.9%—	27.3%—	45.2%—	73.3%—	17.8%—	21.3%—
ReedJ. ReedWardT. WardBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. Hannibal	102	46	-1.4—	107.6—	108.9—	51.8%—	40.8%—	25.4%—	36.6%—	50.6%—	65.5%—	16.8%—	25.0%—
Stewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.ReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. Wright	101	50	16.8—	104.0—	87.2—	53.0%—	26.7%—	19.8%—	25.3%—	45.8%—	71.9%—	23.3%—	19.0%—
ReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsWardT. WardBakerW. BakerWrightJ. Wright	80	41	-21.5—	99.6—	121.0—	50.0%—	26.7%—	21.2%—	41.3%—	60.6%—	68.6%—	19.2%—	33.8%—
ReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. Hannibal	72	35	-11.6—	111.7—	123.3—	57.3%—	36.4%—	19.6%—	25.8%—	63.8%—	75.0%—	14.7%—	25.9%—
ReedJ. ReedWardT. WardWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanHannibalT. Hannibal	72	35	26.4—	141.2—	114.8—	67.2%—	30.0%—	11.2%—	28.1%—	57.1%—	63.2%—	20.0%—	36.5%—
FountainD. FountainWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. Hannibal	51	28	9.8—	111.4—	101.6—	53.3%—	38.5%—	19.5%—	28.9%—	44.6%—	66.7%—	17.6%—	28.3%—
FountainD. FountainWardT. WardWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanCookJ. Cook	51	23	21.3—	138.5—	117.1—	62.5%—	34.8%—	11.9%—	40.9%—	48.9%—	58.6%—	15.1%—	50.0%—
ReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanHannibalT. Hannibal	50	23	-11.1—	103.9—	115.1—	50.0%—	33.3%—	20.0%—	48.7%—	54.8%—	80.0%—	13.2%—	45.2%—
FountainD. FountainWardT. WardWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanHannibalT. Hannibal	48	22	34.6—	132.2—	97.6—	61.8%—	31.8%—	12.4%—	63.2%—	40.5%—	60.0%—	21.2%—	35.7%—
Stewart Jr.C. Stewart Jr.FountainD. FountainBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightCookJ. Cook	46	22	49.6—	118.2—	68.5—	57.5%—	28.6%—	13.1%—	30.0%—	34.7%—	73.3%—	26.5%—	30.6%—
FountainD. FountainWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightCookJ. Cook	43	21	-19.0—	92.5—	111.6—	44.1%—	23.8%—	20.8%—	32.4%—	59.7%—	84.2%—	16.6%—	48.4%—
FountainD. FountainWilliamsM. WilliamsWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanHannibalT. Hannibal	36	15	60.7—	151.0—	90.3—	72.6%—	45.5%—	14.0%—	32.3%—	54.3%—	69.2%—	30.1%—	17.4%—
FountainD. FountainWrightJ. WrightDeanH. DeanHannibalT. HannibalCookJ. Cook	32	16	25.4—	149.0—	123.6—	61.8%—	38.1%—	3.1%—	32.4%—	48.0%—	61.1%—	15.8%—	72.0%—
WilkinsonM. WilkinsonReedJ. ReedWilliamsM. WilliamsBakerW. BakerWrightJ. Wright	32	18	13.4—	113.6—	100.2—	43.5%—	50.0%—	22.1%—	38.7%—	55.6%—	86.7%—	18.8%—	7.4%—
FountainD. FountainBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. HannibalCookJ. Cook	32	13	0.6—	100.9—	100.3—	43.8%—	20.0%—	15.8%—	50.0%—	52.2%—	75.0%—	21.5%—	17.4%—
ReedJ. ReedBakerW. BakerWrightJ. WrightHannibalT. HannibalCookJ. Cook	31	14	-32.2—	99.1—	131.3—	44.2%—	26.3%—	19.2%—	34.6%—	55.4%—	58.8%—	10.1%—	42.9%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.