Marshall18-13

Sun BeltCoach: Cornelius Jackson

18-13NET#174

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dezayne Mingo	1,657	401	80.5%	+7.378	+9.492	+2.136	+3.886	+2.170	−4.496	−10.76	+2.524	+1.264	−1.330	−0.050
Mikal Dawson	1,614	444	78.4%	+0.552	+2.566	+2.038	+3.686	−2.628	−1.774	−7.016	+6.92	+5.694	−2.812	−12.194
Nate Martin	1,480	578	71.9%	+5.772	+4.174	−1.658	−0.744	+4.688	−2.078	−6.418	+4.012	+8.1100	−2.912	−11.194
Jalen Speer	1,475	583	71.7%	+10.286	+3.168	−7.184	+4.390	−2.528	−2.282	−14.92	−4.086	+3.382	−1.526	−11.494
Obinna Anochili-Killen	1,333	725	64.8%	+7.980	+4.676	−3.368	−0.248	−2.628	−2.988	+5.280	−6.194	−0.744	−2.516	−5.176
Wyatt Fricks	578	1,480	28.1%	−14.010	−9.012	+5.024	−0.446	−3.620	+2.022	+3.370	−0.048	−10.02	+2.486	+10.28
Cade Gibbs	567	1,491	27.5%	−5.132	−1.542	+3.530	−0.842	−0.448	+1.724	−7.314	+4.212	+1.566	+3.192	+3.332
Jakob Gibbs	497	1,561	24.2%	+4.368	+4.776	+0.446	−1.634	+5.592	+1.626	+20.7100	−3.886	−2.526	+1.474	+11.56
Ryan Nutter	492	1,566	23.9%	−15.68	−6.720	+8.910	−5.48	+1.666	+5.02	+19.8100	+7.02	+1.062	+3.694	+12.06
Kai Spears	210	1,848	10.2%	+24.1100	+5.680	−18.598	+6.398	−2.926	+1.822	+13.298	−11.498	−3.420	+1.676	−5.578
Will Moore	160	1,898	7.8%	−15.88	−8.414	+7.414	−1.436	+0.656	+3.38	−10.76	−2.978	−9.62	−1.626	+19.60
Erich Harding	128	1,930	6.2%	−4.036	−10.210	−6.380	−1.338	+2.372	+2.812	−12.64	−3.684	−7.54	+3.090	−2.462

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dezayne Mingo	1,657	401	80.5%	4.054	113.962	110.042	50.6%46	36.1%70	16.1%54	32.8%58	49.8%54	67.2%42	17.0%50	40.9%22
Mikal Dawson	1,614	444	78.4%	2.652	112.658	110.042	50.7%46	35.0%66	16.5%50	33.2%58	50.8%50	68.3%46	16.6%46	38.3%26
Nate Martin	1,480	578	71.9%	4.154	113.260	109.144	49.7%40	36.9%74	16.4%52	33.0%58	50.4%50	69.4%52	16.5%44	37.8%28
Jalen Speer	1,475	583	71.7%	5.556	113.060	107.548	51.1%48	34.9%66	16.3%52	30.6%52	48.2%62	67.8%44	16.8%48	37.8%28
Obinna Anochili-Killen	1,333	725	64.8%	5.356	113.760	108.446	49.8%40	34.7%66	15.9%56	36.5%68	47.2%66	66.7%42	16.4%44	39.2%24
Wyatt Fricks	578	1,480	28.1%	-7.534	105.640	113.234	49.6%40	33.0%58	18.3%36	37.1%68	49.3%56	59.8%16	19.0%64	48.3%12
Cade Gibbs	567	1,491	27.5%	-1.146	111.054	112.136	49.3%40	35.4%68	18.2%38	29.4%48	52.4%40	68.1%46	19.5%66	43.4%18
Jakob Gibbs	497	1,561	24.2%	5.856	115.766	109.942	48.7%36	39.7%80	18.1%38	50.6%88	46.4%70	65.1%34	18.3%60	49.6%12
Ryan Nutter	492	1,566	23.9%	-9.332	107.044	116.328	45.7%24	36.9%74	20.7%22	50.1%88	54.7%30	67.7%44	20.0%70	50.3%10
Kai Spears	210	1,848	10.2%	24.284	117.168	92.980	55.7%70	33.0%58	18.6%36	46.7%84	39.1%90	64.0%30	18.7%62	36.1%32
Will Moore	160	1,898	7.8%	-12.128	104.338	116.428	48.6%36	36.2%70	20.0%26	24.8%34	46.6%68	58.2%14	15.8%40	59.1%6
Erich Harding	128	1,930	6.2%	-1.246	102.534	103.758	48.7%36	37.8%76	19.6%28	22.9%28	45.9%70	60.0%16	20.1%70	38.7%26

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dezayne Mingo	1,657	401	80.5%	-3.342	104.538	107.848	46.8%28	33.9%62	20.5%24	43.5%80	47.3%66	66.0%38	18.3%60	41.0%22
Mikal Dawson	1,614	444	78.4%	2.150	110.152	108.048	47.1%30	37.6%76	18.2%38	40.2%74	44.0%78	62.7%26	19.5%66	50.4%10
Nate Martin	1,480	578	71.9%	-1.644	109.150	110.740	50.4%46	32.3%56	18.3%36	39.3%72	46.5%68	61.4%20	19.3%66	48.9%12
Jalen Speer	1,475	583	71.7%	-4.740	109.952	114.630	46.8%28	37.4%74	18.5%36	45.5%82	52.2%42	64.6%32	18.3%60	49.2%12
Obinna Anochili-Killen	1,333	725	64.8%	-2.642	109.150	111.738	50.1%46	37.3%74	18.8%34	31.3%54	53.3%36	67.4%42	18.9%62	44.3%18
Wyatt Fricks	578	1,480	28.1%	6.558	114.662	108.146	50.0%46	36.7%72	16.4%52	33.8%60	49.3%56	69.9%54	16.6%46	38.0%28
Cade Gibbs	567	1,491	27.5%	3.954	112.558	108.646	50.2%46	35.8%70	16.4%52	36.7%68	48.2%62	66.5%38	16.4%44	40.1%24
Jakob Gibbs	497	1,561	24.2%	1.550	111.054	109.544	50.3%46	34.3%64	16.5%50	29.9%50	50.2%50	67.6%44	16.9%48	38.2%26
Ryan Nutter	492	1,566	23.9%	6.358	113.760	107.448	51.1%48	35.2%68	15.7%56	30.3%50	47.7%64	66.7%42	16.4%44	38.2%26
Kai Spears	210	1,848	10.2%	0.146	111.556	111.438	49.3%40	35.9%70	16.7%48	33.5%60	50.5%50	67.3%42	17.1%50	41.5%20
Will Moore	160	1,898	7.8%	3.754	112.858	109.044	50.0%46	35.6%68	16.6%50	35.5%66	49.5%56	67.8%44	17.4%52	39.4%24
Erich Harding	128	1,930	6.2%	2.852	112.758	110.042	50.0%40	35.5%68	16.7%48	35.5%66	49.5%56	67.5%42	17.1%50	41.1%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.