Maryland12-21

Big 10Coach: Buzz Williams

12-21NET#157

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Saunders	1,654	505	76.6%	−0.050	+2.766	+2.832	+3.584	−2.826	−1.572	−8.910	+2.226	−0.050	−2.218	−16.098
David Coit	1,489	670	69.0%	−6.426	+5.580	+11.94	+1.364	−2.628	−2.080	+4.776	+6.14	−0.842	−1.526	+4.822
Andre Mills	1,444	714	66.9%	+11.590	+9.492	−2.160	+3.786	+3.280	−0.862	−2.538	−2.172	+3.584	−1.624	+6.018
Darius Adams	1,392	766	64.5%	−8.022	−4.626	+3.430	−3.420	−3.124	−0.150	+10.494	+0.148	−7.54	+1.576	−0.352
Solomon Washington	1,279	880	59.3%	−6.726	−3.034	+3.728	−2.426	+7.096	+0.738	−8.812	+0.544	+2.476	−3.56	+3.928
Isaiah Watts	919	1,240	42.6%	+17.596	+9.492	−8.188	+5.694	−4.414	−1.776	+8.992	−2.776	+3.080	+1.880	+5.918
Collin Metcalf	625	1,534	28.9%	+1.256	−2.636	−3.770	−0.248	+3.582	+0.836	−14.44	−4.790	+4.590	−4.54	−4.374
Pharrel Payne	461	1,698	21.3%	+17.696	+5.480	−12.396	+3.384	−1.836	+1.132	+19.2100	−2.676	+0.658	+5.3100	−9.090
Myles Rice	456	1,702	21.1%	−11.614	−13.06	−1.558	−9.42	−1.042	+0.542	+0.756	−1.564	−2.626	+3.192	+8.510
George Turkson Jr.	393	1,766	18.2%	−9.618	−1.144	+8.510	+0.456	+3.684	+2.316	−4.626	+7.52	−2.130	+2.184	+1.242
Aleks Alston	352	1,806	16.3%	−17.76	−15.74	+2.036	−7.04	−2.528	+1.724	−1.244	−0.554	−7.44	+1.880	−3.468
Guillermo Del Pino	329	1,830	15.2%	+6.074	−1.046	−7.086	+2.274	−0.052	+1.230	−4.626	−1.162	+4.088	+0.764	−4.474

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Saunders	1,654	505	76.6%	-10.728	104.936	115.630	49.1%36	33.1%62	18.1%32	34.7%54	55.0%32	70.8%52	14.2%36	32.6%48
David Coit	1,489	670	69.0%	-12.826	106.038	118.824	48.7%34	32.9%62	17.9%34	38.2%62	56.5%26	70.6%52	14.3%36	37.8%34
Andre Mills	1,444	714	66.9%	-6.834	107.442	114.234	49.5%36	34.8%68	18.2%32	36.0%56	53.8%38	72.0%58	14.2%36	38.2%34
Darius Adams	1,392	766	64.5%	-13.524	102.630	116.130	47.1%28	32.7%60	18.5%30	40.6%66	54.5%34	68.2%42	15.3%44	36.1%38
Solomon Washington	1,279	880	59.3%	-13.424	103.032	116.428	47.4%28	36.5%74	18.8%28	33.4%50	54.7%34	71.8%58	13.3%30	37.8%34
Isaiah Watts	919	1,240	42.6%	-0.644	109.748	110.342	51.6%46	31.0%54	17.5%36	42.0%70	52.9%42	72.5%62	15.8%48	39.7%30
Collin Metcalf	625	1,534	28.9%	-9.930	102.430	112.338	48.1%30	36.1%74	19.0%26	26.8%32	51.3%48	73.9%66	11.7%20	33.3%46
Pharrel Payne	461	1,698	21.3%	3.352	108.544	105.254	51.0%44	32.3%60	19.3%24	52.2%84	52.4%44	71.3%56	19.0%70	29.1%58
Myles Rice	456	1,702	21.1%	-19.718	94.016	113.734	40.9%10	33.0%62	18.8%28	37.3%60	53.3%40	68.8%44	17.2%58	43.0%24
George Turkson Jr.	393	1,766	18.2%	-18.418	103.432	121.818	48.7%34	36.7%76	20.4%18	33.0%50	60.6%14	69.1%46	16.5%52	37.2%36
Aleks Alston	352	1,806	16.3%	-25.412	91.112	116.528	42.4%14	31.7%58	19.9%22	35.8%56	54.1%36	64.7%28	16.2%50	33.4%44
Guillermo Del Pino	329	1,830	15.2%	-5.536	103.432	109.046	50.2%42	33.7%66	19.5%24	32.9%48	53.6%38	74.2%68	15.3%44	32.5%48

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Elijah Saunders	1,654	505	76.6%	-10.628	102.230	112.836	45.6%22	35.8%72	19.6%22	43.7%72	52.8%42	70.9%54	16.4%52	48.6%16
David Coit	1,489	670	69.0%	-6.434	100.526	106.952	47.4%28	35.5%72	19.9%22	33.6%52	50.4%52	71.3%56	15.8%48	33.0%46
Andre Mills	1,444	714	66.9%	-18.318	98.022	116.328	45.8%22	31.6%58	19.0%26	38.4%62	55.9%28	68.5%42	15.8%48	32.2%48
Darius Adams	1,392	766	64.5%	-5.536	107.242	112.836	50.4%42	35.7%72	18.5%30	30.2%42	54.4%34	75.7%74	13.8%32	36.4%38
Solomon Washington	1,279	880	59.3%	-6.634	106.138	112.736	49.8%36	29.5%48	18.1%32	42.1%70	54.2%36	69.4%46	16.8%56	34.0%44
Isaiah Watts	919	1,240	42.6%	-18.120	100.326	118.324	46.0%24	35.4%72	19.2%24	33.1%50	55.6%30	69.5%48	14.0%34	33.8%44
Collin Metcalf	625	1,534	28.9%	-11.028	105.036	116.030	48.4%32	32.7%60	18.3%32	41.2%68	56.0%28	69.4%46	16.1%50	37.6%34
Pharrel Payne	461	1,698	21.3%	-14.324	103.132	117.426	47.7%30	34.1%66	18.3%32	33.0%50	55.0%32	70.7%52	13.6%32	38.1%34
Myles Rice	456	1,702	21.1%	-8.232	107.040	115.232	50.3%42	34.0%66	18.4%30	36.6%58	54.8%32	71.4%56	14.1%34	34.5%42
George Turkson Jr.	393	1,766	18.2%	-8.832	104.534	113.236	48.2%32	33.1%62	18.1%32	37.6%60	53.1%40	71.2%54	14.3%36	36.0%38
Aleks Alston	352	1,806	16.3%	-7.732	106.840	114.632	49.4%36	34.2%66	18.2%32	37.0%60	54.6%34	72.2%60	14.5%38	36.8%36
Guillermo Del Pino	329	1,830	15.2%	-11.628	104.434	116.030	48.0%30	33.7%66	18.3%30	37.5%60	54.6%34	70.2%50	14.6%38	36.9%36

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.