Memphis22-10

AmericanCoach: Anfernee Hardaway

22-10NET#74

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahvon Quinerly	1,096	111	90.8%	+11.386	+19.2100	+7.914	+4.792	−12.22	−16.2100	−10.78	+7.32	+11.8100	−5.32	+1.042
David Jones Garcia	1,037	170	85.9%	+12.488	+7.886	−4.672	−6.56	+14.1100	−1.874	+13.898	−8.698	−8.34	+0.458	+14.12
Nick Jourdain	956	251	79.2%	+28.0100	+14.098	−14.196	+9.5100	−2.430	−2.784	+1.358	+2.128	+11.5100	+4.196	−2.462
Jaykwon Walton	910	297	75.4%	+5.170	+4.372	−0.752	+0.152	−0.250	−2.380	+8.990	+0.940	+0.454	+0.762	−3.266
Nae'Qwan Tomlin	495	712	41.0%	+2.460	−2.438	−4.974	−0.942	−1.242	−1.470	−2.936	−1.464	−0.448	+2.584	+2.336
Malcolm Dandridge	467	739	38.7%	+0.050	+1.658	+1.640	+5.092	−3.522	+1.624	−8.114	+3.318	+1.768	+1.472	−7.084
Jayden Hardaway	254	953	21.1%	−6.428	−4.926	+1.542	−3.518	+2.674	+1.428	−1.344	+0.446	+9.6100	−4.94	−1.456
Caleb Mills	230	977	19.1%	−5.930	+7.084	+12.84	−3.518	+3.882	−2.784	+13.998	−4.286	−11.32	−5.32	+8.512
Jay Young	147	1,060	12.2%	+1.254	−18.82	−20.198	−9.12	+2.372	+6.90	+5.682	−6.094	−0.646	+8.4100	−1.558
Ashton Hardaway	144	1,062	12.0%	−27.92	−11.58	+16.42	+1.162	−6.28	+4.94	−18.92	+15.70	+0.152	+2.080	+6.618
Jordan Brown	131	1,075	10.9%	−16.48	−15.74	+0.746	−9.82	+0.152	+0.540	+5.982	−10.698	−7.36	−7.72	+1.242

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahvon Quinerly	1,096	111	90.8%	5.856	117.872	111.936	54.7%66	34.6%66	16.3%50	35.1%64	52.4%40	63.6%28	18.8%62	27.5%54
David Jones Garcia	1,037	170	85.9%	6.658	117.170	110.540	53.4%62	37.6%78	17.6%42	37.9%70	50.3%48	61.1%20	19.3%66	29.6%46
Nick Jourdain	956	251	79.2%	10.564	118.974	108.446	56.3%74	35.2%68	17.3%44	36.3%66	52.1%40	65.0%34	20.1%70	26.9%56
Jaykwon Walton	910	297	75.4%	6.158	117.170	111.038	54.3%66	35.7%70	17.3%44	38.2%70	51.9%42	62.3%24	19.5%68	26.7%56
Nae'Qwan Tomlin	495	712	41.0%	6.258	114.664	108.346	53.8%64	35.1%68	17.0%46	34.3%62	50.8%48	62.0%24	20.8%74	28.8%50
Malcolm Dandridge	467	739	38.7%	4.856	117.070	112.236	57.4%78	33.5%62	18.8%34	31.0%54	53.7%34	63.2%26	20.1%70	23.1%68
Jayden Hardaway	254	953	21.1%	-0.246	112.258	112.434	51.6%52	37.8%78	18.9%34	35.0%64	51.9%42	69.8%54	15.4%40	26.3%58
Caleb Mills	230	977	19.1%	0.146	121.778	121.518	51.5%52	38.8%80	15.6%56	47.3%84	48.3%60	53.5%6	15.0%36	34.0%34
Jay Young	147	1,060	12.2%	5.756	99.528	93.878	46.3%30	37.8%78	23.8%10	41.0%76	46.4%68	61.7%22	26.5%94	26.1%58
Ashton Hardaway	144	1,062	12.0%	-19.818	105.942	125.812	55.2%68	30.3%48	22.2%16	19.4%20	65.8%4	62.3%24	21.1%76	33.3%34
Jordan Brown	131	1,075	10.9%	-9.830	102.034	111.936	45.6%26	35.8%70	18.3%38	41.2%76	42.3%82	55.9%10	12.3%20	28.5%50

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jahvon Quinerly	1,096	111	90.8%	-5.538	98.626	104.156	50.0%42	46.8%96	32.6%0	45.9%84	45.1%74	51.9%4	24.1%88	26.5%56
David Jones Garcia	1,037	170	85.9%	-5.736	109.350	115.030	59.9%84	23.5%22	19.4%30	24.1%32	58.9%16	69.4%52	18.9%64	15.5%88
Nick Jourdain	956	251	79.2%	-17.522	104.940	122.416	46.8%30	37.6%78	20.0%26	35.0%64	50.0%54	53.4%6	16.0%44	29.3%48
Jaykwon Walton	910	297	75.4%	1.048	112.760	111.836	54.2%64	35.9%72	19.5%28	29.3%48	50.9%46	61.9%24	18.7%62	29.8%46
Nae'Qwan Tomlin	495	712	41.0%	3.854	117.070	113.234	54.7%66	36.2%72	18.4%36	37.2%68	52.2%40	62.3%24	18.2%60	26.5%56
Malcolm Dandridge	467	739	38.7%	4.856	115.466	110.640	52.4%56	37.0%74	17.2%44	39.1%72	50.4%48	61.5%22	18.8%62	30.1%46
Jayden Hardaway	254	953	21.1%	6.258	117.070	110.938	55.1%68	35.2%68	17.5%42	36.3%66	51.6%44	60.2%18	20.3%72	27.7%54
Caleb Mills	230	977	19.1%	6.058	114.764	108.744	55.0%68	35.0%68	18.3%38	33.3%60	52.6%38	64.8%32	20.3%72	25.6%60
Jay Young	147	1,060	12.2%	4.554	118.372	113.932	55.4%70	35.4%70	17.0%46	35.4%64	52.4%40	62.3%24	18.2%58	27.6%54
Ashton Hardaway	144	1,062	12.0%	8.060	117.470	109.442	54.2%64	36.5%72	17.2%44	38.3%70	50.1%50	62.2%24	19.1%64	26.7%56
Jordan Brown	131	1,075	10.9%	6.658	117.772	111.138	55.4%70	35.8%70	17.8%40	35.4%64	52.9%38	63.2%26	20.0%70	27.3%54

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.