American

Memphis

29-6NET#59Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #66Coach: Anfernee Hardaway

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,301	1,087	9.0—	114.0—	105.0—	53.7%—	38.2%—	19.7%—	38.4%—	48.4%—	64.8%—	19.3%—	33.0%—
JourdainN. JourdainDainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. Rogers	521	254	10.0—	113.7—	103.7—	55.3%—	36.6%—	19.4%—	29.3%—	47.8%—	66.2%—	19.3%—	36.8%—
JourdainN. JourdainHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersCisseM. Cisse	298	157	7.6—	108.5—	100.8—	51.3%—	42.0%—	23.2%—	33.8%—	44.9%—	62.0%—	18.9%—	21.3%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersCarterP. Carter	121	55	-5.6—	101.2—	106.8—	49.0%—	30.9%—	19.1%—	39.0%—	46.7%—	62.7%—	19.2%—	45.7%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersCisseM. Cisse	93	39	26.9—	119.9—	93.0—	58.2%—	35.4%—	14.0%—	46.8%—	47.5%—	75.0%—	23.0%—	26.6%—
JourdainN. JourdainDainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterCarterP. Carter	77	36	-4.9—	110.4—	115.3—	50.8%—	38.5%—	20.8%—	31.8%—	54.4%—	70.0%—	13.4%—	26.5%—
JourdainN. JourdainDainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyRogersC. RogersOkojieB. Okojie	73	34	-5.3—	108.3—	113.6—	54.3%—	42.9%—	26.1%—	39.7%—	58.3%—	59.4%—	24.6%—	28.3%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyRogersC. RogersCisseM. CisseCarterP. Carter	58	25	-12.9—	108.8—	121.7—	49.0%—	45.5%—	22.5%—	52.1%—	63.5%—	81.0%—	16.8%—	37.8%—
HaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersCisseM. CisseCarterP. Carter	50	22	15.1—	119.9—	104.8—	54.9%—	40.0%—	20.0%—	46.3%—	56.4%—	59.1%—	25.7%—	25.6%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterCisseM. CisseCarterP. Carter	41	19	26.4—	86.0—	59.6—	41.9%—	44.0%—	22.1%—	32.4%—	26.7%—	71.4%—	17.7%—	20.9%—
JourdainN. JourdainHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterCisseM. CisseCarterP. Carter	39	20	25.6—	133.8—	108.3—	62.2%—	25.0%—	10.3%—	16.2%—	52.8%—	70.8%—	15.8%—	16.7%—
JourdainN. JourdainDainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyRogersC. RogersCarterP. Carter	38	17	35.9—	140.7—	104.8—	61.0%—	52.4%—	15.6%—	12.2%—	44.1%—	83.3%—	5.2%—	38.2%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersD. HarrisD. Harris	38	14	41.9—	113.9—	72.0—	60.7%—	25.0%—	21.2%—	35.7%—	30.4%—	47.6%—	32.7%—	78.3%—
JourdainN. JourdainDainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterOkojieB. Okojie	35	20	16.8—	96.1—	79.3—	41.9%—	39.1%—	14.1%—	13.5%—	39.7%—	71.4%—	21.0%—	15.4%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyRogersC. RogersCisseM. CisseOkojieB. Okojie	33	17	6.6—	111.4—	104.8—	53.7%—	46.7%—	24.1%—	40.7%—	37.5%—	40.0%—	26.2%—	32.5%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyCisseM. CisseOkojieB. OkojieCarterP. Carter	33	17	3.1—	113.3—	110.2—	55.6%—	50.0%—	24.5%—	51.9%—	51.7%—	66.7%—	12.6%—	34.5%—
DainjaD. DainjaHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersOkojieB. Okojie	32	15	14.3—	123.8—	109.5—	59.1%—	35.3%—	19.0%—	90.9%—	45.2%—	52.4%—	14.1%—	22.6%—
JourdainN. JourdainHaggertyP. HaggertyHunterT. HunterRogersC. RogersCarterP. Carter	31	11	-26.6—	106.3—	133.0—	43.2%—	25.0%—	12.9%—	86.4%—	40.0%—	44.0%—	19.8%—	86.7%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.