Mercer14-16

SouthernCoach: Greg Gary

14-16NET#218

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jake Davis	1,345	540	71.3%	−10.816	−1.244	+9.68	+2.476	−3.622	+0.344	−11.66	+1.534	−6.18	−1.922	+5.620
Jah Quinones	1,111	774	58.9%	−7.924	+0.956	+8.810	−1.336	+7.596	+3.112	+5.180	+3.816	−3.718	+0.152	+1.142
David Thomas	1,045	840	55.4%	+9.582	+10.794	+1.242	+1.666	+1.766	−6.198	−0.450	−4.486	−2.826	−2.416	+5.720
Jalyn McCreary	988	897	52.4%	+5.570	+4.976	−0.652	+0.252	−1.340	−4.494	+2.968	−2.574	+0.454	−2.218	+4.526
Jalen Cobb	976	909	51.8%	+8.980	+1.256	−7.784	+2.778	−2.828	+0.540	+1.862	−1.968	+2.172	+3.894	+6.218
Alex Holt	894	992	47.4%	+8.680	+3.970	−4.774	+0.354	+7.596	+0.934	−2.340	−0.354	+4.488	−1.134	−13.094
Caleb Hunter	882	1,003	46.8%	+1.856	−1.842	−3.668	−1.336	−4.716	−2.582	−1.444	+1.336	+4.888	+0.254	−5.476
Robby Carmody	713	1,172	37.8%	−5.630	−6.520	−0.954	−2.426	−4.914	+0.736	+3.872	+0.346	−0.744	+2.180	+1.042
Anthony Benard	618	1,268	32.8%	−1.046	−5.424	−4.572	+0.152	+2.472	+4.94	−3.532	−1.060	+0.556	+0.458	−5.376
Amanze Ngumezi	493	1,392	26.2%	−17.18	−19.52	−2.462	−5.110	−5.810	+5.42	−2.538	+0.642	+2.776	+0.052	+1.640
TJ Grant	282	1,603	15.0%	+12.488	+15.498	+3.034	+3.080	+7.596	−1.468	+13.198	+1.732	−2.430	+1.776	−4.172

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jake Davis	1,345	540	71.3%	-7.234	107.346	114.530	50.8%48	33.1%58	17.2%44	24.0%32	52.0%42	62.4%24	18.4%60	40.4%22
Jah Quinones	1,111	774	58.9%	-7.334	108.048	115.330	49.6%42	37.1%74	18.4%36	29.4%48	53.1%36	62.6%24	19.0%64	39.2%22
David Thomas	1,045	840	55.4%	0.246	112.458	112.236	50.8%48	34.9%66	14.3%66	27.1%42	49.7%54	62.9%26	17.9%56	41.3%20
Jalyn McCreary	988	897	52.4%	-1.544	110.052	111.438	50.2%46	33.5%62	15.0%60	28.7%46	50.4%48	64.3%30	17.9%56	40.8%20
Jalen Cobb	976	909	51.8%	0.246	108.248	108.046	51.5%52	32.7%58	17.3%44	28.2%46	50.6%48	65.2%34	20.8%76	41.8%18
Alex Holt	894	992	47.4%	0.548	109.752	109.244	50.3%46	38.0%78	17.6%42	26.1%38	51.4%44	66.5%38	18.4%60	32.0%40
Caleb Hunter	882	1,003	46.8%	-3.140	106.744	109.842	49.4%42	31.6%54	15.8%54	26.6%40	52.3%40	66.7%38	19.1%64	35.9%30
Robby Carmody	713	1,172	37.8%	-7.534	103.638	111.138	48.6%38	31.0%52	17.5%42	29.7%50	51.8%42	63.6%28	20.3%72	39.4%22
Anthony Benard	618	1,268	32.8%	-4.738	104.038	108.744	50.2%46	35.8%70	20.4%24	25.0%36	50.9%46	64.5%32	19.3%66	35.3%32
Amanze Ngumezi	493	1,392	26.2%	-16.722	93.318	110.040	46.3%30	29.9%46	21.1%20	25.5%36	52.1%42	66.1%36	19.0%64	40.0%22
TJ Grant	282	1,603	15.0%	6.558	120.776	114.232	52.7%58	40.5%84	15.9%54	38.5%70	53.1%36	62.1%24	20.4%72	35.2%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jake Davis	1,345	540	71.3%	3.652	108.548	104.954	48.5%38	36.6%74	16.8%46	35.7%66	50.5%48	68.5%48	20.4%72	34.7%32
Jah Quinones	1,111	774	58.9%	0.648	107.146	106.550	50.9%48	29.6%46	15.2%58	24.3%34	49.4%54	66.3%38	19.0%64	38.1%24
David Thomas	1,045	840	55.4%	-9.432	101.734	111.038	49.2%40	33.2%58	20.5%24	27.6%44	54.0%32	65.7%36	20.3%72	35.6%30
Jalyn McCreary	988	897	52.4%	-6.936	105.040	112.036	50.1%46	34.8%66	19.4%30	25.8%38	53.0%38	63.9%30	20.2%72	36.4%28
Jalen Cobb	976	909	51.8%	-8.732	107.046	115.728	48.8%38	35.6%70	16.8%46	26.4%40	52.6%38	63.0%26	17.0%50	35.7%30
Alex Holt	894	992	47.4%	-8.134	105.842	113.932	50.0%42	30.5%50	16.6%48	28.4%46	51.8%42	62.1%24	19.5%68	45.0%16
Caleb Hunter	882	1,003	46.8%	-4.938	108.548	113.432	50.8%48	36.3%72	18.2%38	28.0%44	51.0%46	61.9%24	18.9%64	41.3%20
Robby Carmody	713	1,172	37.8%	-2.042	110.152	112.036	51.0%50	36.0%72	16.8%46	25.9%38	51.5%44	64.4%32	18.2%60	38.4%24
Anthony Benard	618	1,268	32.8%	-3.840	109.452	113.234	50.1%46	33.3%62	15.5%56	28.4%46	51.9%42	63.9%30	18.9%64	40.5%20
Amanze Ngumezi	493	1,392	26.2%	0.446	112.760	112.334	51.4%50	35.7%70	15.7%56	27.9%44	51.4%44	63.4%28	19.0%64	38.3%24
TJ Grant	282	1,603	15.0%	-5.936	105.342	111.238	49.7%42	32.9%58	17.3%44	25.3%36	51.3%44	64.4%32	18.7%62	39.4%22

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.