Poss1,937
Net Rtg-2.042
ORtg107.342
DRtg109.246
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,937 | 943 | -2.042 | 107.342 | 109.246 | 51.7%46 | 30.7%52 | 17.4%36 | 32.6%48 | 50.9%50 | 71.3%56 | 15.0%42 | 34.8%42 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. Carter | 209 | 113 | -5.936 | 98.122 | 104.058 | 49.4%36 | 25.0%28 | 19.6%22 | 37.2%60 | 47.8%64 | 77.0%78 | 11.6%20 | 27.0%64 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenSmithS. Smith | 127 | 69 | -9.330 | 92.614 | 102.064 | 43.3%16 | 38.5%82 | 20.4%18 | 20.0%16 | 50.5%52 | 68.9%44 | 19.9%76 | 16.2%90 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonOglesbyA. OglesbySmithS. Smith | 101 | 56 | 21.680 | 112.054 | 90.384 | 54.5%60 | 35.4%70 | 18.8%28 | 26.1%30 | 44.0%80 | 76.4%76 | 17.7%62 | 32.1%48 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenCarterJ. Carter | 74 | 36 | -15.622 | 101.728 | 117.228 | 45.7%22 | 19.5%14 | 13.6%66 | 50.0%82 | 51.4%48 | 60.0%14 | 15.7%46 | 42.5%24 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonCarterJ. CarterSmithS. Smith | 67 | 34 | -19.618 | 98.824 | 118.424 | 44.5%18 | 47.2%96 | 23.9%6 | 49.1%82 | 50.0%58 | 61.3%18 | 11.2%18 | 34.5%42 |
| LandsK. LandsAlstonT. AlstonOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 58 | 30 | -9.430 | 102.230 | 111.640 | 50.0%36 | 30.3%52 | 17.3%38 | 18.9%14 | 51.8%46 | 67.7%40 | 13.7%32 | 20.0%84 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterSmithS. Smith | 50 | 22 | -8.032 | 104.736 | 112.736 | 51.2%44 | 18.5%12 | 14.1%62 | 34.1%52 | 58.8%18 | 68.4%42 | 21.3%82 | 55.9%8 |
| LoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterSmithS. Smith | 48 | 21 | 0.146 | 117.366 | 117.128 | 54.3%60 | 30.8%52 | 10.5%84 | 21.7%20 | 68.6%2 | 66.7%32 | 26.7%96 | 40.0%30 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonCarterJ. CarterWhitlock Jr.M. Whitlock Jr. | 44 | 21 | 16.674 | 121.676 | 105.056 | 74.0%100 | 12.5%6 | 22.5%10 | 96.0%100 | 45.3%74 | 60.0%14 | 15.6%46 | 23.3%74 |
| LoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. Carter | 44 | 22 | 15.872 | 102.832 | 87.088 | 58.8%78 | 22.2%22 | 22.8%10 | 23.5%24 | 33.0%96 | 60.5%16 | 9.7%12 | 10.0%96 |
| LandsK. LandsLoofeC. LoofeGreenT. GreenOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. Carter | 42 | 21 | -13.326 | 83.46 | 96.874 | 42.3%14 | 33.3%66 | 23.8%6 | 5.1%2 | 44.9%76 | 83.3%94 | 14.1%34 | 41.0%28 |
| AlstonT. AlstonOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterSmithS. SmithJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 41 | 20 | 20.178 | 120.474 | 100.368 | 59.7%80 | 16.7%8 | 4.9%98 | 33.3%50 | 47.2%68 | 75.0%70 | 13.6%30 | 11.1%96 |
| LandsK. LandsAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenCarterJ. CarterJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 37 | 17 | -42.54 | 107.642 | 150.10 | 53.6%56 | 43.8%92 | 26.9%2 | 46.4%78 | 64.3%8 | 68.4%42 | 2.7%2 | 40.0%30 |
| LandsK. LandsGreenT. GreenOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 36 | 18 | -1.742 | 119.672 | 121.320 | 48.8%34 | 42.3%90 | 8.3%92 | 4.7%2 | 63.3%8 | 61.5%18 | 23.2%88 | 33.3%44 |
| LandsK. LandsOglesbyA. OglesbyCarterJ. CarterSmithS. SmithJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 34 | 13 | -25.412 | 101.830 | 127.212 | 44.1%18 | 23.8%26 | 8.7%92 | 14.7%8 | 59.1%18 | 58.3%12 | 21.2%82 | 86.4%0 |
| LoofeC. LoofeAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenOglesbyA. OglesbySmithS. Smith | 34 | 15 | 6.456 | 106.238 | 99.868 | 61.1%86 | 6.3%2 | 17.7%34 | 14.8%8 | 47.7%66 | 87.5%96 | 17.6%60 | 77.3%2 |
| LandsK. LandsAlstonT. AlstonGreenT. GreenSmithS. SmithJovanovicL. Jovanovic | 33 | 12 | -11.128 | 105.838 | 117.028 | 47.7%30 | 15.4%8 | 15.1%54 | 77.3%98 | 55.2%32 | 66.7%32 | 18.0%64 | 24.1%72 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

