On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 908 | 462 | 4.4— | 108.0— | 103.7— | 50.8%— | 38.1%— | 20.6%— | 35.4%— | 50.1%— | 73.2%— | 18.4%— | 28.8%— |
| MatthewsC. MatthewsHubbardJ. HubbardJeffriesD. JeffriesDavisD. DavisSmithT. Smith | 130 | 63 | -4.2— | 104.4— | 108.7— | 49.5%— | 33.3%— | 20.7%— | 49.5%— | 54.8%— | 77.2%— | 18.6%— | 25.7%— |
| MooreS. MooreMatthewsC. MatthewsHubbardJ. HubbardJeffriesD. JeffriesSmithT. Smith | 100 | 48 | 16.9— | 119.5— | 102.7— | 57.0%— | 37.5%— | 20.1%— | 49.4%— | 49.4%— | 78.0%— | 16.0%— | 25.0%— |
| MooreS. MooreMatthewsC. MatthewsJones Jr.S. Jones Jr.HubbardJ. HubbardSmithT. Smith | 85 | 44 | 2.6— | 106.1— | 103.5— | 53.0%— | 30.2%— | 21.2%— | 40.3%— | 50.7%— | 70.0%— | 20.9%— | 30.0%— |
| MooreS. MooreMatthewsC. MatthewsBell Jr.J. Bell Jr.JeffriesD. JeffriesDavisD. Davis | 83 | 49 | 39.1— | 129.9— | 90.8— | 56.4%— | 55.8%— | 20.5%— | 46.2%— | 47.9%— | 80.0%— | 23.8%— | 28.6%— |
| FortT. FortMatthewsC. MatthewsBell Jr.J. Bell Jr.JeffriesD. JeffriesDavisD. Davis | 73 | 40 | 0.4— | 101.3— | 100.9— | 44.2%— | 50.0%— | 26.0%— | 24.6%— | 55.6%— | 82.9%— | 19.1%— | 7.9%— |
| MooreS. MooreMatthewsC. MatthewsJeffriesD. JeffriesDavisD. DavisSmithT. Smith | 46 | 24 | 12.7— | 114.3— | 101.6— | 52.0%— | 39.3%— | 12.9%— | 10.2%— | 55.7%— | 78.9%— | 23.8%— | 25.7%— |
| MooreS. MooreMatthewsC. MatthewsHubbardJ. HubbardDavisD. DavisSmithT. Smith | 30 | 13 | 8.9— | 98.9— | 90.1— | 61.9%— | 33.3%— | 29.7%— | 33.3%— | 42.5%— | 78.6%— | 21.6%— | 50.0%— |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2023-24. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.
