Missouri St.17-16

MVCCoach: Dana Ford

17-16NET#153

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Donovan Clay	1,652	363	82.0%	+14.092	+10.192	−3.970	+5.894	−3.026	−3.992	−7.216	−1.766	+1.162	+1.776	+3.728
Alston Mason	1,574	442	78.1%	−8.224	−2.836	+5.422	−2.626	−7.46	−6.298	−13.24	+3.914	+0.556	+1.574	+7.314
Chance Moore	1,279	736	63.5%	+3.764	+1.458	−2.360	−0.446	+4.686	+1.034	+7.086	−0.152	+1.970	+0.152	−1.256
Matthew Lee	1,158	857	57.5%	−5.132	+0.252	+5.322	+1.870	+0.960	+3.112	+7.588	+1.236	−3.718	−1.824	−7.082
Damien Mayo Jr.	1,031	984	51.2%	+9.382	+4.072	−5.276	+0.254	+1.666	−1.368	−2.936	−2.170	+0.354	+1.676	+3.132
NJ Benson	1,022	994	50.7%	+7.878	+6.482	−1.456	+2.576	+4.586	+0.048	−0.848	−1.868	−3.818	+0.256	−3.870
Cesare Edwards	913	1,103	45.3%	−8.124	−2.936	+5.222	−0.744	−3.026	+1.526	+5.982	+3.220	+2.474	−1.134	+1.042
Raphe Ayres	855	1,160	42.4%	+0.352	+2.062	+1.840	+0.354	−1.934	−1.266	+3.974	+2.822	+4.888	−1.232	+1.440
Tyler Bey	281	1,735	13.9%	−6.230	−17.34	−11.292	−4.612	−3.126	+3.112	−7.914	−5.892	−2.726	+1.776	−7.786
Nick Kramer	190	1,826	9.4%	−15.610	−6.320	+9.310	−3.022	+1.866	+1.724	−9.010	−0.454	−7.84	−1.332	+6.318

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Donovan Clay	1,652	363	82.0%	2.150	106.244	104.156	50.2%46	29.7%46	16.2%52	29.6%50	48.3%60	74.3%74	13.3%26	25.4%60
Alston Mason	1,574	442	78.1%	-2.342	103.838	106.050	48.7%38	28.8%42	15.6%56	28.1%46	49.5%54	74.2%74	13.3%26	26.4%58
Chance Moore	1,279	736	63.5%	0.948	104.940	104.056	49.1%40	31.9%56	17.3%44	33.4%60	48.6%58	74.8%74	13.0%24	24.3%64
Matthew Lee	1,158	857	57.5%	-2.642	104.540	107.148	50.0%42	30.7%50	18.2%38	34.1%62	49.1%56	72.6%66	12.2%20	21.9%72
Damien Mayo Jr.	1,031	984	51.2%	4.154	106.444	102.260	49.3%42	31.1%52	16.3%52	29.4%48	47.6%64	74.2%74	13.8%28	26.3%58
NJ Benson	1,022	994	50.7%	3.452	107.646	104.256	50.4%48	32.5%58	16.9%46	30.4%52	47.7%62	72.3%66	13.1%24	22.9%68
Cesare Edwards	913	1,103	45.3%	-4.938	102.836	107.746	48.8%40	28.6%42	17.8%40	34.1%62	50.4%48	75.4%78	12.4%20	25.3%60
Raphe Ayres	855	1,160	42.4%	-0.346	105.642	105.952	49.4%42	29.2%44	16.2%52	33.1%58	50.2%48	76.9%82	12.3%20	25.6%60
Tyler Bey	281	1,735	13.9%	-5.836	89.514	95.376	45.2%24	27.7%38	19.6%28	24.0%32	43.6%78	71.8%64	14.4%32	18.2%82
Nick Kramer	190	1,826	9.4%	-14.624	98.726	113.334	46.5%30	31.9%56	18.5%36	22.7%30	48.3%60	67.0%42	11.8%18	30.5%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Donovan Clay	1,652	363	82.0%	-11.928	96.122	108.046	44.4%22	32.7%58	20.1%26	36.7%68	50.0%54	73.2%70	11.5%16	21.7%72
Alston Mason	1,574	442	78.1%	5.956	106.644	100.764	51.3%50	36.2%72	21.7%18	41.3%76	45.6%72	73.7%72	11.8%18	19.2%80
Chance Moore	1,279	736	63.5%	-2.842	103.538	106.350	49.5%42	27.3%36	16.3%50	26.4%40	48.7%58	72.9%68	12.9%24	25.5%60
Matthew Lee	1,158	857	57.5%	2.550	104.338	101.862	48.2%36	29.8%46	15.2%60	26.6%40	47.9%62	76.3%80	14.0%30	28.9%50
Damien Mayo Jr.	1,031	984	51.2%	-5.238	102.334	107.546	49.1%40	29.5%46	17.6%42	32.3%58	49.6%54	73.9%72	12.1%20	23.2%68
NJ Benson	1,022	994	50.7%	-4.440	101.132	105.552	47.9%36	28.0%40	16.9%46	31.2%54	49.5%54	76.1%80	12.8%24	26.7%56
Cesare Edwards	913	1,103	45.3%	3.252	105.742	102.560	49.5%42	31.6%54	16.2%52	28.3%46	47.2%64	73.0%68	13.4%26	24.3%64
Raphe Ayres	855	1,160	42.4%	-0.646	103.538	104.156	49.1%40	31.1%52	17.4%42	29.2%48	47.4%64	72.1%64	13.5%26	24.1%64
Tyler Bey	281	1,735	13.9%	0.346	106.844	106.550	49.9%42	30.7%50	16.5%50	31.9%56	49.5%54	74.5%74	12.7%22	25.9%58
Nick Kramer	190	1,826	9.4%	1.048	105.040	104.056	49.5%42	30.1%48	16.8%48	31.7%56	48.6%58	74.8%74	13.1%24	24.2%64

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.