Missouri8-24

SECCoach: Dennis Gates

8-24NET#155

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sean East II	1,539	293	84.0%	−1.146	−1.542	−0.450	+1.870	−4.616	−0.150	−7.614	−1.262	−2.428	+0.052	+2.634
Nick Honor	1,449	383	79.1%	−8.822	+8.588	+17.30	+3.988	−1.240	−2.178	−4.726	+7.62	−0.844	−4.64	+9.38
Tamar Bates	1,284	547	70.1%	+2.158	+10.894	+8.710	+2.878	+1.666	−3.490	+2.666	+1.038	−3.222	−2.022	+14.22
Noah Carter	1,232	600	67.3%	+2.762	−1.742	−4.472	−2.724	−1.538	−1.976	−2.638	+1.138	+6.596	−0.150	−13.596
Aidan Shaw	689	1,143	37.6%	−11.316	−2.140	+9.210	−2.624	+1.162	−0.150	+4.174	+2.326	−7.94	+3.290	+23.20
Anthony Robinson II	558	1,274	30.4%	+9.282	+1.156	−8.186	−2.128	+4.686	−0.150	+6.284	−3.078	−2.132	+6.5100	+8.012
Jordan Butler	465	1,367	25.4%	−0.050	−5.324	−5.276	+0.454	−3.224	+1.132	−7.914	−5.692	−1.636	−2.814	−12.494
Connor Vanover	459	1,373	25.0%	+11.486	−1.940	−13.396	+2.072	+2.876	+4.64	−2.638	−3.180	+10.7100	−1.232	−15.396
Jesus Carralero Martin	437	1,395	23.8%	+5.170	+1.658	−3.568	−1.734	+5.290	−1.368	+2.164	−1.262	−5.510	+4.998	+2.138
Curt Lewis	294	1,538	16.1%	−14.910	−11.18	+3.830	−0.942	−3.424	+4.16	−1.642	−0.556	+3.178	−7.02	−11.694
Caleb Grill	226	1,605	12.4%	+32.4100	+8.588	−23.998	+5.594	−3.026	−1.874	−0.350	−6.996	+11.7100	+0.458	−22.598
Mabor Majak	215	1,617	11.7%	−7.326	+4.372	+11.66	−1.040	+6.092	+0.246	+10.294	+4.212	−9.04	−2.814	−10.190
Trent Pierce	201	1,630	11.0%	−17.48	−10.610	+6.716	−6.16	−4.814	−0.252	+5.682	+4.014	−3.124	+3.290	+29.00
John Tonje	108	1,724	5.9%	−13.312	−12.76	+0.646	+4.288	−17.62	+6.02	−6.120	+7.12	+16.9100	−3.410	−18.398

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sean East II	1,539	293	84.0%	-6.136	108.048	114.132	50.6%48	28.7%42	16.6%48	30.9%54	50.7%48	59.1%16	19.7%68	42.7%18
Nick Honor	1,449	383	79.1%	-7.834	110.052	117.824	51.2%50	29.2%44	16.2%52	31.1%54	52.5%38	59.3%16	18.8%62	44.2%16
Tamar Bates	1,284	547	70.1%	-5.338	111.556	116.826	51.2%50	30.0%46	15.6%56	32.9%58	51.2%46	58.5%14	19.1%64	46.5%14
Noah Carter	1,232	600	67.3%	-4.938	107.746	112.634	49.5%42	29.0%42	16.0%52	31.2%54	51.3%46	61.7%22	19.7%68	37.7%26
Aidan Shaw	689	1,143	37.6%	-12.926	106.946	119.820	48.7%38	30.2%48	16.5%50	34.6%62	52.4%40	54.5%8	21.7%80	57.0%6
Anthony Robinson II	558	1,274	30.4%	0.548	109.050	108.644	48.9%40	32.6%58	16.5%50	36.4%66	48.8%56	58.0%14	24.2%90	47.9%12
Jordan Butler	465	1,367	25.4%	-5.936	104.340	110.240	50.6%48	27.1%36	17.4%42	26.2%38	46.9%66	58.3%14	17.6%54	33.3%36
Connor Vanover	459	1,373	25.0%	2.550	106.946	104.356	51.8%54	31.7%54	20.1%26	30.1%50	48.6%58	67.5%44	18.9%64	30.9%42
Jesus Carralero Martin	437	1,395	23.8%	-2.042	109.552	111.538	49.1%40	33.3%62	15.6%56	33.7%60	50.0%54	55.3%8	23.5%86	43.8%16
Curt Lewis	294	1,538	16.1%	-18.420	98.928	117.324	49.6%42	26.6%34	20.1%26	30.7%52	50.5%48	62.0%24	13.9%30	32.7%38
Caleb Grill	226	1,605	12.4%	22.582	115.766	93.280	55.1%68	26.9%34	15.0%60	31.8%56	44.9%74	69.6%54	20.1%70	22.6%70
Mabor Majak	215	1,617	11.7%	-12.328	112.158	124.414	49.5%42	34.7%66	16.7%48	41.1%76	54.5%30	51.6%4	17.3%52	33.5%34
Trent Pierce	201	1,630	11.0%	-21.418	98.826	120.220	44.9%24	25.2%28	16.4%50	37.1%68	54.5%30	56.7%10	22.6%84	68.5%2
John Tonje	108	1,724	5.9%	-18.420	96.322	114.830	54.4%66	12.8%4	22.2%16	26.3%38	57.6%18	75.5%78	16.5%46	25.0%62

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sean East II	1,539	293	84.0%	-5.038	109.552	114.530	48.8%40	33.3%62	16.7%48	38.5%70	51.9%42	61.5%22	19.7%68	40.1%22
Nick Honor	1,449	383	79.1%	1.148	101.532	100.564	47.2%32	30.4%48	18.3%38	35.8%66	45.0%74	60.1%18	23.3%86	34.9%32
Tamar Bates	1,284	547	70.1%	-7.434	100.630	108.046	48.4%38	28.4%40	19.0%32	30.2%52	50.2%48	61.7%22	21.2%76	32.3%38
Noah Carter	1,232	600	67.3%	-7.734	109.452	117.126	52.2%56	30.5%50	17.8%40	33.9%60	50.2%48	55.2%8	19.8%68	51.1%10
Aidan Shaw	689	1,143	37.6%	-1.544	109.150	110.640	51.3%50	29.1%42	16.6%48	30.5%52	50.1%50	62.4%24	18.5%60	33.7%34
Anthony Robinson II	558	1,274	30.4%	-8.732	107.948	116.626	51.0%50	28.0%40	16.6%48	30.2%50	51.8%42	60.1%18	17.8%56	39.9%22
Jordan Butler	465	1,367	25.4%	-5.936	109.652	115.528	50.3%46	30.3%48	16.3%50	34.1%62	52.5%40	59.9%16	20.5%74	45.7%14
Connor Vanover	459	1,373	25.0%	-8.932	108.750	117.624	49.9%42	28.8%42	15.4%58	32.7%58	51.7%42	56.8%10	20.0%70	46.2%14
Jesus Carralero Martin	437	1,395	23.8%	-7.134	107.948	115.030	50.8%48	28.1%40	16.9%46	31.6%54	51.2%46	60.8%20	18.6%62	41.7%18
Curt Lewis	294	1,538	16.1%	-3.540	110.052	113.532	50.5%48	30.0%48	15.9%54	32.3%58	51.0%46	58.9%14	20.9%76	44.3%16
Caleb Grill	226	1,605	12.4%	-9.830	107.246	117.026	49.7%42	29.8%46	16.8%46	32.1%56	51.8%42	57.9%12	19.7%68	45.1%16
Mabor Majak	215	1,617	11.7%	-5.038	107.748	112.834	50.5%48	28.7%42	16.6%48	30.9%54	50.4%48	60.6%18	20.1%70	43.6%16
Trent Pierce	201	1,630	11.0%	-4.040	109.452	113.532	51.0%50	30.0%48	16.6%48	31.5%54	50.6%48	59.8%16	19.4%66	39.6%22
John Tonje	108	1,724	5.9%	-5.138	109.050	114.132	50.1%46	30.3%48	16.2%52	32.4%58	50.5%48	58.6%14	20.0%70	43.3%18

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.