Nebraska20-15

Big 10Coach: Fred Hoiberg

20-15NET#59

Poss2,375

Net Rtg3.954

ORtg110.252

DRtg106.352

Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,375	1,144	3.954	110.252	106.352	52.3%54	29.4%44	16.5%50	35.3%64	50.8%50	69.6%54	17.8%54	26.7%58
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryMeahB. MeahWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. Williams	186	101	8.862	116.668	107.748	59.1%82	37.3%74	22.0%16	21.3%24	54.3%32	70.2%56	18.2%58	22.7%70
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsHoibergS. Hoiberg	154	77	23.384	133.592	110.242	60.1%86	27.7%38	13.6%72	81.7%100	52.0%44	70.6%58	13.7%26	29.5%48
GaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	145	67	30.690	123.080	92.382	53.1%58	35.6%68	13.1%76	39.1%72	43.4%80	67.4%42	19.2%64	22.7%70
GaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. Essegian	132	70	-5.738	115.566	121.218	48.0%34	35.7%70	11.3%84	32.0%56	55.1%30	68.5%48	14.8%34	26.3%58
GaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganHoibergS. Hoiberg	103	55	-17.022	100.028	117.026	45.7%24	29.3%44	17.5%44	51.2%88	61.2%10	63.6%28	21.9%80	29.2%50
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. Essegian	73	31	10.264	110.754	100.566	42.7%16	35.0%66	12.3%80	54.8%90	43.8%80	71.4%60	20.1%70	68.8%2
GaryJ. GaryMeahB. MeahWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. Essegian	72	37	6.558	126.486	119.820	63.9%92	26.5%32	15.3%60	31.1%54	54.1%34	65.9%38	14.2%30	21.9%72
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganHoibergS. Hoiberg	53	29	-22.916	103.436	126.412	46.0%26	23.5%22	9.4%92	26.0%38	62.2%8	81.8%94	11.5%14	24.4%64
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	52	23	27.386	121.678	94.378	57.0%74	30.8%50	11.6%84	16.0%12	40.7%88	62.5%24	19.3%66	32.6%40
WorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	51	26	9.564	129.088	119.522	62.0%90	20.0%14	7.8%94	28.3%44	56.0%26	75.0%76	8.1%6	10.0%96
GaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. EssegianUlisA. Ulis	50	22	-16.522	97.724	114.232	43.6%18	30.8%50	23.9%10	38.5%72	52.0%42	69.0%50	6.3%4	18.4%82
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	42	19	0.948	119.974	119.022	50.0%40	26.1%30	7.2%96	30.8%52	59.5%14	90.5%100	5.0%2	18.9%80
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelMeahB. MeahWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. Essegian	40	17	48.198	113.260	65.198	59.4%84	33.3%62	22.6%14	31.3%54	30.3%98	80.0%90	16.3%44	18.2%82
GaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganHoibergS. HoibergJacobsenC. Jacobsen	39	23	-23.614	100.430	124.014	54.1%62	31.8%54	15.4%58	16.2%12	47.5%64	83.3%96	2.5%2	17.5%84
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsHoibergS. HoibergJacobsenC. Jacobsen	38	20	29.990	109.650	79.794	48.4%34	21.1%16	20.9%22	22.6%28	51.4%46	71.4%60	26.6%94	8.6%96
GaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterMorganA. MorganEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	38	17	39.594	105.540	66.198	57.4%76	21.1%16	15.8%56	11.8%6	30.3%98	59.4%16	26.4%94	15.8%88
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. Essegian	35	17	3.452	93.316	89.984	48.3%34	27.8%38	25.4%6	17.2%14	43.8%80	76.2%80	12.0%16	15.6%88
GaryJ. GaryWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. HoibergJacobsenC. Jacobsen	34	13	39.594	136.094	96.574	90.6%100	0.0%0	14.8%64	168.8%100	38.9%90	65.0%34	23.4%86	48.1%14
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelGaryJ. GaryWorsterR. WorsterWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. Morgan	33	17	-61.52	80.96	142.52	43.1%18	38.1%76	30.0%2	17.2%14	73.4%0	68.8%48	14.0%28	25.0%64
GaryJ. GaryMeahB. MeahWilliamsB. WilliamsEssegianC. EssegianUlisA. Ulis	33	15	-3.142	110.152	113.334	67.5%96	10.0%2	24.5%8	60.0%94	47.1%66	45.0%2	16.2%44	11.4%94
BuyuktuncelB. BuyuktuncelWilliamsB. WilliamsMorganA. MorganEssegianC. EssegianHoibergS. Hoiberg	32	15	-34.18	84.68	118.722	44.2%20	20.0%14	21.9%16	15.4%10	57.8%20	70.6%58	17.0%48	15.6%88

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25 (4,899 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.