Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 10
Nebraska logo

Nebraska

21-14NET#58Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #75Coach: Fred Hoiberg
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brice Williams−11.6+8.1+19.7+4.9−2.1−0.5+5.7+6.8+3.7−8.6+1.9
Juwan Gary+3.3+9.8+6.5+4.4+3.8−0.5+11.0+2.3−4.7+1.4+1.8
Sam Hoiberg+5.8+0.3−5.6−1.1−3.8−2.8+8.4−2.4+0.5+1.4−0.4
Connor Essegian+5.7+5.3−0.4+0.4+2.7−2.4−3.5−2.2−2.1−1.1−0.4
Rollie Worster+2.8+4.9+2.1+0.8−0.4−0.6+1.9+2.3+0.4−0.6+0.2
Berke Buyuktuncel+3.2−3.3−6.4−1.8+1.7+3.5−0.1−0.5+6.1−0.6+1.3
Andrew Morgan−12.5−6.1+6.4−5.0+1.9−1.1−3.9+2.4+0.1−1.9−6.0
Braxton Meah−5.1−8.0−2.9+2.7+0.1+6.8−10.3−2.1−3.4+1.1−2.7
Ahron Ulis−11.7−8.8+2.9−2.5−0.7+1.2−5.6+2.8−1.6+2.4+1.6
Cale Jacobsen+13.3+1.8−11.5+2.2−5.1−2.4+1.8−8.2+1.5+1.4+6.8
Gavin Griffiths+5.0−5.7−10.7−2.0−2.9−1.0−4.6−2.6+1.1+5.6+3.2

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brice Williams2.1111.4109.353.1%29.0%16.4%36.2%51.9%70.3%16.4%26.9%
Juwan Gary4.7112.6107.953.4%30.4%16.4%38.1%51.4%68.4%18.1%27.1%
Sam Hoiberg6.3110.3103.951.8%27.8%15.3%38.9%49.8%69.8%18.4%26.5%
Connor Essegian6.4112.5106.152.4%30.6%15.5%33.8%49.9%68.7%17.2%26.5%
Rollie Worster5.2112.4107.252.6%29.2%16.2%36.1%51.8%69.8%17.5%26.7%
Berke Buyuktuncel5.5108.5103.051.3%30.3%18.3%35.2%50.6%72.7%17.4%27.4%
Andrew Morgan-2.8106.9109.749.7%30.3%15.9%33.2%52.1%69.7%16.7%23.5%
Braxton Meah0.1104.3104.254.3%29.4%21.5%27.7%49.3%67.1%18.6%24.7%
Ahron Ulis-4.9103.6108.450.4%28.9%17.4%31.1%52.9%68.4%19.5%27.8%
Cale Jacobsen15.4111.796.354.1%25.0%14.4%36.8%43.7%70.9%18.9%32.6%
Gavin Griffiths8.4105.096.650.5%26.8%15.6%31.2%48.4%70.6%22.8%29.5%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Brice Williams13.7103.389.648.2%31.1%16.9%30.5%45.0%66.5%25.1%25.1%
Juwan Gary1.4102.8101.449.0%26.6%16.8%27.1%49.1%73.1%16.7%25.3%
Sam Hoiberg0.5110.0109.552.9%31.6%18.1%30.5%52.2%69.3%16.9%26.9%
Connor Essegian0.7107.2106.552.1%27.9%17.8%37.3%52.1%70.9%18.4%26.9%
Rollie Worster2.3107.5105.151.8%29.6%16.8%34.3%49.6%69.4%18.1%26.6%
Berke Buyuktuncel2.3111.7109.453.1%28.6%14.8%35.3%51.1%66.7%18.0%26.0%
Andrew Morgan9.7113.0103.354.7%28.5%17.0%37.2%49.7%69.6%18.6%29.5%
Braxton Meah5.3112.3107.151.6%29.4%14.7%38.0%51.4%70.6%17.4%27.4%
Ahron Ulis6.8112.4105.552.9%29.6%16.2%36.7%50.2%70.0%17.2%26.3%
Cale Jacobsen2.1109.9107.852.0%30.1%16.8%35.0%51.9%69.4%17.6%25.8%
Gavin Griffiths3.4110.7107.352.5%29.7%16.6%35.7%51.1%69.5%17.2%26.4%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.