Nebraska20-15

Big 10Coach: Fred Hoiberg

20-15NET#59

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brice Williams	2,002	373	84.3%	−11.616	+8.188	+19.70	+4.992	−2.132	−0.556	+5.782	+6.82	+3.784	−8.62	+1.938
Juwan Gary	1,787	588	75.3%	+3.364	+9.892	+6.516	+4.490	+3.884	−0.556	+11.096	+2.324	−4.712	+1.474	+1.838
Sam Hoiberg	1,369	1,005	57.7%	+5.874	+0.352	−5.678	−1.138	−3.818	−2.886	+8.490	−2.474	+0.556	+1.474	−0.452
Connor Essegian	1,332	1,043	56.1%	+5.772	+5.378	−0.452	+0.454	+2.776	−2.482	−3.532	−2.272	−2.130	−1.132	−0.452
Rollie Worster	1,306	1,069	55.0%	+2.862	+4.976	+2.138	+0.860	−0.448	−0.658	+1.964	+2.324	+0.456	−0.642	+0.248
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,145	1,230	48.2%	+3.264	−3.334	−6.482	−1.832	+1.766	+3.58	−0.152	−0.556	+6.196	−0.642	+1.342
Andrew Morgan	1,106	1,269	46.6%	−12.514	−6.120	+6.418	−5.010	+1.968	−1.166	−3.930	+2.424	+0.152	−1.922	−6.080
Braxton Meah	643	1,732	27.1%	−5.132	−8.014	−2.966	+2.778	+0.152	+6.80	−10.38	−2.172	−3.420	+1.170	−2.764
Ahron Ulis	598	1,777	25.2%	−11.716	−8.812	+2.932	−2.526	−0.744	+1.230	−5.622	+2.822	−1.636	+2.486	+1.640
Cale Jacobsen	320	2,055	13.5%	+13.392	+1.862	−11.594	+2.274	−5.112	−2.484	+1.864	−8.298	+1.566	+1.474	+6.816
Gavin Griffiths	230	2,144	9.7%	+5.070	−5.722	−10.792	−2.030	−2.926	−1.064	−4.626	−2.676	+1.162	+5.6100	+3.232

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brice Williams	2,002	373	84.3%	2.150	111.456	109.344	53.1%58	29.0%42	16.4%50	36.2%66	51.9%44	70.3%56	16.4%44	26.9%56
Juwan Gary	1,787	588	75.3%	4.756	112.658	107.948	53.4%60	30.4%48	16.4%52	38.1%70	51.4%46	68.4%48	18.1%58	27.1%56
Sam Hoiberg	1,369	1,005	57.7%	6.358	110.352	103.958	51.8%52	27.8%38	15.3%60	38.9%72	49.8%54	69.8%54	18.4%60	26.5%58
Connor Essegian	1,332	1,043	56.1%	6.458	112.558	106.152	52.4%54	30.6%50	15.5%58	33.8%60	49.9%54	68.7%48	17.2%50	26.5%58
Rollie Worster	1,306	1,069	55.0%	5.256	112.458	107.250	52.6%56	29.2%44	16.2%52	36.1%66	51.8%44	69.8%54	17.5%54	26.7%58
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,145	1,230	48.2%	5.556	108.548	103.060	51.3%50	30.3%48	18.3%36	35.2%64	50.6%50	72.7%68	17.4%52	27.4%56
Andrew Morgan	1,106	1,269	46.6%	-2.842	106.944	109.742	49.7%40	30.3%48	15.9%56	33.2%58	52.1%42	69.7%54	16.7%46	23.5%68
Braxton Meah	643	1,732	27.1%	0.146	104.338	104.256	54.3%64	29.4%44	21.5%18	27.7%42	49.3%56	67.1%42	18.6%60	24.7%64
Ahron Ulis	598	1,777	25.2%	-4.940	103.636	108.446	50.4%46	28.9%42	17.4%44	31.1%54	52.9%38	68.4%48	19.5%68	27.8%54
Cale Jacobsen	320	2,055	13.5%	15.472	111.756	96.374	54.1%62	25.0%26	14.4%66	36.8%68	43.7%80	70.9%60	18.9%64	32.6%40
Gavin Griffiths	230	2,144	9.7%	8.462	105.040	96.674	50.5%46	26.8%34	15.6%58	31.2%54	48.4%60	70.6%58	22.8%84	29.5%48

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Brice Williams	2,002	373	84.3%	13.770	103.336	89.686	48.2%34	31.1%52	16.9%48	30.5%52	45.0%74	66.5%38	25.1%90	25.1%62
Juwan Gary	1,787	588	75.3%	1.450	102.834	101.464	49.0%38	26.6%32	16.8%48	27.1%40	49.1%56	73.1%70	16.7%46	25.3%62
Sam Hoiberg	1,369	1,005	57.7%	0.548	110.052	109.544	52.9%58	31.6%54	18.1%38	30.5%52	52.2%42	69.3%52	16.9%48	26.9%58
Connor Essegian	1,332	1,043	56.1%	0.748	107.244	106.552	52.1%54	27.9%38	17.8%40	37.3%68	52.1%42	70.9%60	18.4%60	26.9%58
Rollie Worster	1,306	1,069	55.0%	2.352	107.546	105.154	51.8%52	29.6%46	16.8%48	34.3%62	49.6%56	69.4%52	18.1%58	26.6%58
Berke Buyuktuncel	1,145	1,230	48.2%	2.352	111.756	109.444	53.1%58	28.6%42	14.8%64	35.3%64	51.1%48	66.7%38	18.0%56	26.0%60
Andrew Morgan	1,106	1,269	46.6%	9.764	113.060	103.358	54.7%64	28.5%40	17.0%46	37.2%68	49.7%56	69.6%52	18.6%60	29.5%48
Braxton Meah	643	1,732	27.1%	5.356	112.358	107.150	51.6%50	29.4%44	14.7%64	38.0%70	51.4%46	70.6%56	17.4%52	27.4%56
Ahron Ulis	598	1,777	25.2%	6.858	112.458	105.554	52.9%58	29.6%44	16.2%52	36.7%68	50.2%50	70.0%54	17.2%50	26.3%58
Cale Jacobsen	320	2,055	13.5%	2.150	109.952	107.848	52.0%52	30.1%48	16.8%48	35.0%64	51.9%44	69.4%52	17.6%54	25.8%60
Gavin Griffiths	230	2,144	9.7%	3.452	110.754	107.348	52.5%54	29.7%46	16.6%50	35.7%66	51.1%48	69.5%52	17.2%50	26.4%58

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.