Poss1,868
Net Rtg-4.938
ORtg102.932
DRtg107.848
Combinations with at least 30 possessions together; chips rank against every qualifying D-I unit
On the court
Off the court
Combo size
Columns
| Workload | Efficiency | Four Factors | Opponent | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineup | |||||||||||||
| Totals | 1,868 | 874 | -4.938 | 102.932 | 107.848 | 49.3%36 | 32.3%60 | 19.0%26 | 43.5%72 | 51.7%46 | 68.0%40 | 18.7%68 | 44.4%22 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILeaksJ. LeaksLewisK. Lewis | 149 | 70 | -6.734 | 93.916 | 100.666 | 38.9%8 | 33.0%62 | 13.4%68 | 40.7%68 | 51.8%46 | 78.5%82 | 18.4%66 | 30.1%54 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIMorrisJ. MorrisLeaksJ. Leaks | 144 | 66 | -24.914 | 91.412 | 116.328 | 39.4%8 | 34.9%68 | 20.1%20 | 58.4%90 | 57.6%22 | 67.2%38 | 17.3%60 | 37.8%34 |
| EllisD. EllisMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILeaksJ. LeaksLewisK. LewisNewtonA. Newton | 133 | 77 | -16.222 | 101.830 | 118.026 | 55.1%62 | 35.5%72 | 23.4%8 | 32.7%48 | 61.2%12 | 80.0%86 | 16.4%52 | 40.8%28 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIMorrisJ. MorrisJenkinsM. Jenkins | 112 | 56 | 0.948 | 104.234 | 103.360 | 46.0%24 | 37.9%80 | 16.9%40 | 29.7%40 | 51.1%50 | 60.8%16 | 21.7%84 | 27.7%62 |
| EllisD. EllisMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIMorrisJ. MorrisLeaksJ. LeaksNewtonA. Newton | 57 | 25 | 13.468 | 109.648 | 96.276 | 51.0%44 | 37.9%80 | 17.7%34 | 36.7%58 | 52.7%42 | 72.0%58 | 26.4%96 | 51.4%12 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIBainesM. BainesLeaksJ. Leaks | 53 | 25 | -42.24 | 92.714 | 134.94 | 48.0%30 | 38.7%82 | 24.6%6 | 12.2%6 | 57.4%22 | 48.1%2 | 13.5%30 | 53.2%12 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIMorrisJ. MorrisNewtonA. Newton | 52 | 26 | -12.626 | 102.430 | 115.032 | 57.7%74 | 21.1%18 | 23.2%8 | 25.6%30 | 48.0%64 | 68.8%44 | 8.2%6 | 24.5%70 |
| Wright-FordeD. Wright-FordeEllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIMorrisJ. Morris | 49 | 25 | -21.316 | 94.718 | 115.930 | 44.6%18 | 29.2%46 | 22.6%10 | 43.2%72 | 57.5%22 | 60.9%16 | 20.0%76 | 47.5%16 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILewisK. LewisNewtonA. Newton | 45 | 28 | 37.794 | 138.596 | 100.866 | 75.0%100 | 42.9%90 | 22.3%12 | 27.8%36 | 45.6%74 | 51.7%4 | 20.6%78 | 35.6%40 |
| Wright-FordeD. Wright-FordeEllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILewisK. Lewis | 44 | 20 | 7.860 | 105.938 | 98.072 | 56.3%68 | 33.3%66 | 18.0%32 | 75.0%98 | 41.9%86 | 70.4%52 | 14.9%40 | 62.2%6 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIBainesM. BainesJenkinsM. Jenkins | 43 | 22 | -26.612 | 119.472 | 146.10 | 59.7%80 | 15.8%8 | 9.4%90 | 33.3%50 | 65.5%6 | 43.8%2 | 14.0%34 | 50.0%14 |
| EllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIJenkinsM. JenkinsLewisK. Lewis | 42 | 23 | 0.446 | 103.132 | 102.762 | 40.8%10 | 26.9%38 | 12.0%76 | 31.6%46 | 47.6%66 | 72.0%58 | 11.7%20 | 14.3%92 |
| Wright-FordeD. Wright-FordeEllisD. EllisJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIBainesM. Baines | 39 | 17 | -46.34 | 101.228 | 147.50 | 56.8%70 | 23.1%24 | 28.5%2 | 81.8%98 | 66.1%4 | 66.7%32 | 9.0%8 | 35.5%40 |
| JamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILeaksJ. LeaksJenkinsM. JenkinsLewisK. Lewis | 37 | 15 | -47.94 | 89.912 | 137.84 | 52.1%50 | 21.4%20 | 27.3%2 | 50.0%82 | 66.0%4 | 76.9%78 | 14.1%34 | 72.0%2 |
| Wright-FordeD. Wright-FordeJamisonE. JamisonMcComb IIIA. McComb IIIJenkinsM. JenkinsLewisK. Lewis | 37 | 16 | 35.992 | 122.978 | 87.188 | 56.3%68 | 33.3%66 | 10.9%82 | 50.0%82 | 31.6%98 | 60.0%14 | 16.3%52 | 26.3%66 |
| Wright-FordeD. Wright-FordeMcComb IIIA. McComb IIILeaksJ. LeaksJenkinsM. JenkinsLewisK. Lewis | 32 | 16 | 20.478 | 132.592 | 112.138 | 58.9%78 | 43.8%92 | 15.8%50 | 42.9%70 | 48.0%64 | 53.3%6 | 21.8%84 | 60.0%6 |
Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2025-26 (5,146 of them). +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.

