Notre Dame13-18

ACCCoach: Micah Shrewsberry

13-18NET#97

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braeden Shrewsberry	1,636	386	80.9%	+6.274	+4.174	−2.060	+1.566	−1.834	−2.988	+1.660	−0.252	+0.252	+1.982	+6.916
Cole Certa	1,377	646	68.1%	+0.654	+6.986	+6.316	−0.940	+1.870	−2.786	+6.684	+5.46	+4.088	+1.170	+7.214
Carson Towt	1,256	767	62.1%	−7.126	−2.934	+4.126	−3.120	+6.494	+0.246	−7.714	+5.18	+1.668	−0.052	−10.592
Jalen Haralson	1,171	852	57.9%	−12.612	−10.410	+2.236	−4.314	−1.142	+1.722	+10.894	+1.334	−0.248	−0.248	+5.320
Logan Imes	1,032	991	51.0%	+4.970	+5.380	+0.546	+1.466	−2.034	−2.080	+1.358	−2.676	−2.128	−1.822	+2.138
Garrett Sundra	860	1,163	42.5%	+4.066	−6.420	−10.492	−3.022	−2.430	−0.152	−10.48	−3.784	+0.150	+1.678	−13.896
Brady Koehler	812	1,210	40.2%	−3.736	−1.046	+2.734	+0.658	−2.826	+0.148	+3.872	+1.432	−0.248	+0.560	+4.326
Sir Mohammed	810	1,213	40.0%	−9.818	+2.566	+12.24	+2.374	+3.078	+1.624	−5.822	+4.410	−3.122	−2.218	−2.564
Markus Burton	450	1,573	22.2%	+16.896	+6.384	−10.592	+3.282	+1.770	−0.862	−0.648	−3.784	+1.062	+3.092	−2.062
Kebba Njie	293	1,730	14.5%	+25.0100	+4.274	−20.798	+6.998	+0.152	+4.82	−3.332	−10.798	+5.894	−1.624	−10.292
Ryder Frost	275	1,748	13.6%	−8.322	−0.746	+7.612	+1.466	−0.844	+2.118	−0.152	+0.544	−6.46	−1.230	+10.66

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braeden Shrewsberry	1,636	386	80.9%	-2.442	109.748	112.138	52.6%52	30.4%52	16.5%44	33.4%50	52.5%44	73.7%66	14.1%34	37.2%36
Cole Certa	1,377	646	68.1%	-3.440	111.152	114.532	52.0%48	31.3%56	16.2%46	35.2%54	54.3%34	75.1%72	14.1%34	38.2%34
Carson Towt	1,256	767	62.1%	-6.234	107.842	114.034	51.2%44	33.0%62	17.1%38	30.3%42	54.4%34	74.3%68	13.7%32	31.9%50
Jalen Haralson	1,171	852	57.9%	-8.930	104.536	113.436	50.4%42	30.3%52	17.8%34	37.8%62	53.0%40	73.6%66	13.6%32	38.0%34
Logan Imes	1,032	991	51.0%	-1.244	111.552	112.736	53.0%52	29.8%50	16.1%48	33.7%52	51.3%48	72.7%62	12.9%26	36.8%36
Garrett Sundra	860	1,163	42.5%	-1.242	105.236	106.552	50.6%42	29.3%48	17.0%40	27.2%34	50.4%52	73.7%66	14.7%38	28.0%60
Brady Koehler	812	1,210	40.2%	-5.836	108.344	114.134	52.6%52	29.0%46	17.1%38	35.4%56	53.3%40	73.6%66	14.0%34	38.4%32
Sir Mohammed	810	1,213	40.0%	-9.530	110.450	119.922	53.6%56	32.5%60	18.0%32	29.7%40	55.1%32	71.8%58	12.4%24	34.3%44
Markus Burton	450	1,573	22.2%	9.562	113.858	104.358	54.8%62	32.1%60	16.4%44	32.6%48	49.6%58	74.5%68	16.1%50	34.2%44
Kebba Njie	293	1,730	14.5%	17.876	112.554	94.878	58.2%76	30.8%54	21.1%16	30.3%42	43.4%82	78.6%82	12.4%24	27.1%64
Ryder Frost	275	1,748	13.6%	-10.828	108.344	119.124	53.5%56	30.1%52	18.9%28	33.0%50	52.9%42	68.1%40	12.7%26	45.0%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braeden Shrewsberry	1,636	386	80.9%	-8.532	105.638	114.134	51.1%44	32.2%60	19.4%24	31.8%46	52.7%42	73.6%66	12.2%22	30.3%54
Cole Certa	1,377	646	68.1%	-4.038	104.234	108.248	52.9%52	29.5%48	18.9%28	28.6%38	49.0%60	71.1%54	13.0%28	31.1%52
Carson Towt	1,256	767	62.1%	0.948	110.750	109.944	54.3%58	26.6%36	17.0%40	38.0%62	49.3%58	72.7%62	13.7%32	42.4%24
Jalen Haralson	1,171	852	57.9%	3.752	114.960	111.240	54.7%62	31.4%56	16.1%48	27.0%34	51.8%46	73.8%66	13.9%32	32.7%46
Logan Imes	1,032	991	51.0%	-6.036	106.238	112.238	51.5%46	31.7%58	18.1%32	32.4%48	53.9%36	74.8%70	14.7%38	34.7%42
Garrett Sundra	860	1,163	42.5%	-5.236	111.652	116.928	53.6%56	31.8%58	17.1%38	37.6%60	54.1%36	73.7%66	13.0%28	41.8%26
Brady Koehler	812	1,210	40.2%	-2.142	109.346	111.440	52.1%50	31.8%58	17.0%40	31.6%46	51.9%46	73.8%66	13.5%30	34.0%44
Sir Mohammed	810	1,213	40.0%	0.346	107.942	107.650	51.4%46	29.5%48	16.4%44	35.4%56	50.7%52	74.9%70	14.6%38	36.8%36
Markus Burton	450	1,573	22.2%	-7.334	107.542	114.832	51.6%46	30.4%52	17.2%38	33.2%50	53.3%40	73.5%66	13.1%28	36.2%38
Kebba Njie	293	1,730	14.5%	-7.234	108.344	115.530	51.3%46	30.7%52	16.4%44	33.6%52	54.1%36	72.7%62	14.0%34	37.3%36
Ryder Frost	275	1,748	13.6%	-2.542	109.046	111.540	52.1%50	30.8%54	16.8%42	33.1%50	52.4%44	74.5%68	13.9%34	34.4%42

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.