Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Horizon
Oakland logo

Oakland

24-12NET#126Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #184Coach: Greg Kampe
Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Trey Townsend−14.2−7.4+6.8−1.3−7.9−0.6−0.9+1.2−6.2−3.7−2.2
Jack Gohlke−3.9−2.1+1.8+0.7−3.9−1.3−9.9+0.3−2.3+0.4+6.9
Blake Lampman−0.1+2.3+2.4−1.8+1.2−2.7−2.3−0.3+1.2−3.1+3.1
Chris Conway+0.7−4.7−5.4−0.5−6.4−2.7−13.0+0.7+3.2+0.3−15.0
DQ Cole−0.3−3.0−2.6−2.9−1.3−1.2+7.1−3.0−1.0−0.8+0.4
Isaiah Jones+5.1+2.9−2.2+0.8+6.9+2.1−5.1−0.1+1.0+2.0+1.4
Rocket Watts−7.1−0.4+6.7−2.9−0.5−0.9+4.7+1.4−5.9+0.9−0.6
Tuburu Naivalurua+1.5−0.7−2.2+0.6+5.4+3.7+0.2−1.8−2.4+1.5−1.4
Tone Hunter−4.6−3.0+1.7+2.3−2.4+3.8+12.5+2.5+3.8+0.6+6.9
Osei Price+10.3+6.4−3.9+3.4+2.0+0.9+5.8+0.6+6.1+0.9+4.1

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Trey Townsend1.5110.9109.451.5%32.1%16.4%30.4%51.2%68.6%15.9%26.8%
Jack Gohlke2.1111.2109.151.8%32.0%16.1%28.3%51.2%68.6%16.4%28.7%
Blake Lampman2.9112.5109.651.0%33.3%15.5%29.7%51.0%69.6%15.2%28.2%
Chris Conway3.3109.9106.751.5%30.5%15.4%25.7%51.3%70.4%16.4%21.5%
DQ Cole2.8110.3107.550.4%32.3%15.9%33.7%49.8%68.8%16.0%27.2%
Isaiah Jones5.8113.3107.552.1%36.7%17.6%27.7%51.0%69.8%17.4%27.8%
Rocket Watts-1.3111.4112.749.9%32.6%15.9%33.3%51.9%65.7%16.8%26.7%
Tuburu Naivalurua4.0111.2107.252.1%36.7%19.0%30.6%49.8%67.5%17.4%26.0%
Tone Hunter-0.6109.4110.053.5%31.0%19.4%40.6%53.1%72.2%16.8%32.6%
Osei Price12.2117.4105.254.8%34.6%17.2%35.7%51.7%74.6%17.1%30.7%

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Trey Townsend15.7118.3102.652.8%40.0%17.0%31.3%50.0%74.8%19.6%29.0%
Jack Gohlke6.0113.3107.351.1%35.9%17.5%38.2%50.8%70.9%16.0%21.7%
Blake Lampman3.0110.2107.252.9%32.1%18.2%32.0%51.3%68.4%18.3%25.1%
Chris Conway2.5114.6112.052.0%36.8%18.1%38.7%50.7%67.2%16.1%36.5%
DQ Cole3.2113.3110.153.2%33.6%17.1%26.6%52.7%69.7%16.7%26.8%
Isaiah Jones0.7110.4109.751.3%29.9%15.5%32.8%51.1%68.7%15.4%26.4%
Rocket Watts5.8111.9106.052.8%33.1%16.8%28.6%50.5%71.6%16.0%27.3%
Tuburu Naivalurua2.5111.9109.451.5%31.3%15.3%30.4%51.7%69.9%15.8%27.5%
Tone Hunter4.0112.3108.351.2%33.4%15.7%28.1%50.6%68.4%16.2%25.6%
Osei Price1.9111.0109.151.3%32.7%16.4%29.9%51.0%68.5%16.2%26.6%
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.