Ohio St.22-14

Big 10Coach: Chris Holtmann

22-14NET#51

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bruce Thornton	1,912	458	80.7%	+3.966	+1.760	−2.260	−1.536	+0.556	−4.494	−13.44	−1.666	−4.912	+2.686	−4.974
Roddy Gayle Jr.	1,806	564	76.2%	−3.140	−1.642	+1.542	+0.050	−0.250	+0.836	+1.058	+0.346	−0.546	−1.528	−8.588
Jamison Battle	1,805	565	76.2%	−2.642	+2.764	+5.322	+1.262	−0.646	−3.388	−17.52	+3.518	+4.186	−2.022	+1.938
Felix Okpara	1,351	1,019	57.0%	−2.442	−3.036	−0.652	+0.152	−2.232	−0.454	−11.66	−3.682	−1.538	−4.74	−11.392
Evan Mahaffey	1,259	1,111	53.1%	−8.622	−1.742	+6.816	−1.040	−1.340	−0.658	+1.460	+4.98	−0.744	+0.052	−3.568
Dale Bonner	1,142	1,228	48.2%	+8.480	+0.352	−8.286	−1.338	−0.746	−0.454	+9.192	−2.978	+2.978	+1.776	+3.828
Zed Key	879	1,491	37.1%	−0.848	+1.358	+2.038	−1.734	+4.084	+0.442	+7.488	+1.930	+0.354	+2.382	+4.426
Scotty Middleton	744	1,626	31.4%	+6.274	−0.548	−6.882	+0.556	+4.284	+2.416	+2.364	−5.792	−1.042	−0.248	+1.142
Devin Royal	622	1,748	26.3%	+2.460	−0.448	−2.864	+0.354	+3.278	+3.310	+4.376	−0.958	+0.656	+2.484	+6.418
Taison Chatman	123	2,247	5.2%	−6.130	−0.946	+5.322	+7.798	−16.02	+6.70	+14.498	+3.616	+5.190	−1.824	+7.116
Bowen Hardman	120	2,250	5.1%	−0.648	+12.896	+13.44	+11.3100	−12.62	−1.672	+0.254	+8.50	−3.024	+0.356	+3.928

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bruce Thornton	1,912	458	80.7%	7.660	111.356	103.758	50.6%48	32.5%58	14.9%62	29.7%50	48.3%60	69.2%50	16.4%46	28.0%52
Roddy Gayle Jr.	1,806	564	76.2%	6.158	110.654	104.556	50.8%48	32.4%58	15.9%54	32.3%58	48.6%58	70.0%54	15.6%40	26.9%56
Jamison Battle	1,805	565	76.2%	6.258	111.656	105.452	51.1%50	32.3%56	14.9%62	28.2%46	49.4%54	71.2%60	15.4%40	29.4%48
Felix Okpara	1,351	1,019	57.0%	5.856	109.752	103.856	50.9%48	31.5%54	15.5%56	27.2%42	47.1%64	69.5%52	13.9%30	24.4%64
Evan Mahaffey	1,259	1,111	53.1%	3.052	110.252	107.248	50.4%46	31.8%56	15.4%58	32.8%58	50.8%48	69.8%54	15.9%44	27.3%54
Dale Bonner	1,142	1,228	48.2%	11.266	111.156	99.966	50.2%46	32.1%56	15.5%56	36.9%68	47.0%66	71.6%62	16.8%48	30.9%42
Zed Key	879	1,491	37.1%	6.458	111.858	105.452	49.7%42	34.9%66	15.9%54	36.8%68	49.8%54	70.3%56	17.4%54	31.7%40
Scotty Middleton	744	1,626	31.4%	11.266	110.654	99.468	51.2%50	35.3%68	17.3%44	33.7%60	44.6%76	69.4%52	15.8%42	29.7%46
Devin Royal	622	1,748	26.3%	8.762	110.754	102.062	51.0%50	34.8%66	18.2%38	35.3%64	47.9%62	70.6%56	17.7%56	33.7%34
Taison Chatman	123	2,247	5.2%	1.048	110.252	109.144	58.2%80	17.0%8	22.0%18	45.9%84	52.0%42	75.0%74	14.3%32	35.6%30
Bowen Hardman	120	2,250	5.1%	6.258	123.182	116.926	61.6%88	20.4%14	14.1%68	32.3%58	56.6%22	67.2%42	16.2%44	32.7%38

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Bruce Thornton	1,912	458	80.7%	3.754	109.652	105.952	52.0%54	32.0%56	19.2%30	43.2%80	49.9%54	74.0%72	13.9%30	32.8%38
Roddy Gayle Jr.	1,806	564	76.2%	9.362	112.258	103.058	50.8%48	32.6%58	15.1%60	31.3%54	48.3%60	70.5%56	17.1%52	35.5%30
Jamison Battle	1,805	565	76.2%	8.862	108.950	100.166	49.9%42	32.9%58	18.2%38	45.8%82	45.9%70	67.1%42	17.5%54	27.5%54
Felix Okpara	1,351	1,019	57.0%	8.260	112.760	104.556	50.7%48	33.7%64	15.9%54	38.9%72	50.7%48	71.0%60	18.6%62	35.7%30
Evan Mahaffey	1,259	1,111	53.1%	11.566	111.958	100.366	51.3%50	33.1%58	16.0%52	31.4%54	45.8%70	70.5%56	15.9%44	30.8%44
Dale Bonner	1,142	1,228	48.2%	2.852	110.854	108.146	51.4%50	32.8%58	15.9%54	27.8%44	50.0%54	68.7%48	15.1%38	27.1%56
Zed Key	879	1,491	37.1%	7.158	110.554	103.458	51.4%52	30.9%52	15.6%56	29.4%48	47.9%62	70.0%54	15.1%38	27.3%54
Scotty Middleton	744	1,626	31.4%	4.956	111.156	106.250	50.7%48	31.1%52	14.9%60	31.4%54	50.3%48	70.4%56	16.0%44	28.6%50
Devin Royal	622	1,748	26.3%	6.258	111.156	104.854	50.7%48	31.6%54	14.8%62	31.0%54	48.8%56	69.9%54	15.3%38	27.3%54
Taison Chatman	123	2,247	5.2%	7.258	111.056	103.856	50.5%48	33.0%58	15.4%58	31.5%54	48.4%58	69.9%54	16.0%44	28.6%50
Bowen Hardman	120	2,250	5.1%	6.858	110.354	103.558	50.3%46	33.0%58	15.8%54	32.1%56	48.2%60	70.2%56	15.9%44	28.7%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.