Oregon24-12

Pac 12Coach: Dana Altman

24-12NET#59

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jermaine Couisnard	1,942	387	83.4%	+8.480	+11.996	+3.432	+1.668	−0.250	−5.296	+11.896	+2.524	+2.474	−0.346	+2.138
Jackson Shelstad	1,691	637	72.6%	−11.914	−4.030	+7.912	−0.644	−2.728	+1.032	−8.312	+2.920	−8.24	+1.370	+1.738
Jadrian Tracey	1,536	792	66.0%	+3.162	+3.670	+0.546	+0.658	−1.438	−2.380	+2.364	−1.060	+2.978	−3.98	+1.440
Kwame Evans Jr.	1,319	1,010	56.6%	+4.768	+0.654	−4.170	−0.248	−1.836	−0.760	+2.364	−0.252	−1.340	+2.786	−1.154
Brennan Rigsby Jr.	1,294	1,035	55.6%	−0.648	−4.726	−4.070	+0.152	+0.758	+3.410	−1.644	−2.372	+0.960	+0.762	−0.450
N'Faly Dante	1,141	1,187	49.0%	+0.452	−2.538	−3.064	+0.050	−2.232	−0.454	−4.526	+1.138	+4.488	+0.762	−3.870
Kario Oquendo	1,029	1,299	44.2%	−8.622	−6.022	+2.536	−0.150	−1.934	+3.012	−1.344	+1.632	+1.666	+0.356	−0.552
Keeshawn Barthelemy	648	1,680	27.8%	+8.278	+7.786	−0.452	+3.182	+1.868	−1.266	+2.364	−1.362	−3.818	+0.864	+1.640
Mahamadou Diawara	572	1,757	24.6%	−3.338	−2.736	+0.646	−1.732	+3.278	+1.428	−5.322	−1.968	−1.042	−1.922	−2.160
Jesse Zarzuela	234	2,094	10.1%	+12.188	+7.686	−4.572	−1.732	+6.394	−3.490	+7.488	−2.776	+0.960	−1.036	+1.440
Nate Bittle	126	2,202	5.4%	+11.386	+11.194	−0.250	−3.916	+11.7100	−5.096	+8.390	−3.482	+2.272	−5.52	+2.934

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jermaine Couisnard	1,942	387	83.4%	6.658	115.164	108.546	52.0%54	32.4%58	14.2%66	34.0%62	52.4%40	69.8%54	18.2%58	32.1%40
Jackson Shelstad	1,691	637	72.6%	1.850	112.058	110.140	51.6%52	31.6%54	15.3%58	29.8%50	52.8%38	67.0%42	18.6%62	32.3%38
Jadrian Tracey	1,536	792	66.0%	6.358	114.364	108.046	52.0%54	31.9%56	14.3%66	32.8%58	51.6%44	70.3%56	16.9%50	32.2%40
Kwame Evans Jr.	1,319	1,010	56.6%	7.360	113.460	106.150	51.7%52	31.6%54	14.7%62	33.1%58	51.8%42	68.8%50	19.4%66	31.3%42
Brennan Rigsby Jr.	1,294	1,035	55.6%	4.956	111.056	106.150	51.8%54	32.7%58	16.5%48	31.4%54	50.9%46	69.8%54	18.5%62	31.6%40
N'Faly Dante	1,141	1,187	49.0%	5.556	111.858	106.350	51.8%54	31.3%52	14.8%62	29.8%50	52.5%40	71.8%62	18.6%62	29.8%46
Kario Oquendo	1,029	1,299	44.2%	0.448	109.752	109.344	51.7%54	31.3%52	16.7%48	31.4%54	52.9%38	70.3%56	18.4%60	31.5%42
Keeshawn Barthelemy	648	1,680	27.8%	11.166	118.774	107.646	54.0%64	33.7%64	14.2%66	33.7%60	51.0%46	66.8%42	18.8%62	32.9%38
Mahamadou Diawara	572	1,757	24.6%	2.752	111.156	108.346	50.5%48	34.8%66	16.1%52	28.1%46	50.6%48	68.7%48	16.8%50	30.3%44
Jesse Zarzuela	234	2,094	10.1%	16.174	119.976	103.856	50.2%46	38.0%78	11.9%80	38.7%72	49.5%54	70.2%56	17.4%54	33.0%36
Nate Bittle	126	2,202	5.4%	15.972	123.682	107.746	48.0%36	43.3%90	10.3%88	39.8%74	48.7%58	71.4%60	13.1%24	34.5%32

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jermaine Couisnard	1,942	387	83.4%	-1.844	103.236	105.054	50.4%48	32.6%58	19.4%30	22.3%28	49.9%54	67.4%44	18.5%60	30.1%46
Jackson Shelstad	1,691	637	72.6%	13.870	116.068	102.260	52.2%56	34.3%64	14.3%66	38.1%70	49.8%54	75.2%78	17.3%52	30.5%44
Jadrian Tracey	1,536	792	66.0%	3.252	110.754	107.646	51.4%50	33.3%62	16.5%50	30.6%52	52.6%38	67.4%44	20.8%76	30.9%44
Kwame Evans Jr.	1,319	1,010	56.6%	2.650	112.760	110.240	51.9%54	33.4%62	15.5%56	30.8%52	52.0%42	70.1%54	16.7%48	32.4%38
Brennan Rigsby Jr.	1,294	1,035	55.6%	5.556	115.766	110.140	51.7%54	32.0%56	13.1%74	32.9%58	53.2%36	68.9%50	17.9%56	32.0%40
N'Faly Dante	1,141	1,187	49.0%	5.056	114.364	109.344	51.7%54	33.4%62	15.2%58	34.3%62	51.4%44	67.4%42	17.9%56	33.6%34
Kario Oquendo	1,029	1,299	44.2%	9.062	115.866	106.748	51.8%54	33.2%58	13.7%70	32.6%58	51.2%46	68.7%48	18.1%58	32.0%40
Keeshawn Barthelemy	648	1,680	27.8%	2.952	110.954	108.046	50.9%48	31.9%56	15.4%58	31.4%54	52.3%40	70.5%56	18.0%58	31.3%42
Mahamadou Diawara	572	1,757	24.6%	6.058	113.762	107.746	52.2%56	31.5%54	14.7%62	33.4%60	52.4%40	69.7%54	18.7%62	32.3%38
Jesse Zarzuela	234	2,094	10.1%	4.054	112.358	108.346	51.9%54	31.6%54	15.4%58	31.3%54	52.2%40	69.3%52	18.3%60	31.6%40
Nate Bittle	126	2,202	5.4%	4.654	112.558	107.946	52.0%54	31.6%54	15.3%58	31.6%54	52.1%40	69.3%52	18.5%62	31.6%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.