Penn8-19

IvyCoach: Steve Donahue

8-19NET#308

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sam Brown	1,429	297	82.8%	+1.958	+9.792	+7.714	+2.576	−3.322	−4.094	+10.894	+3.416	+5.994	−5.62	−0.654
Ethan Roberts	1,319	407	76.4%	+7.678	+15.2100	+7.614	+7.7100	+1.666	−1.876	+1.460	+4.012	−0.842	+0.356	−0.652
Nick Spinoso	1,188	538	68.8%	−15.78	−5.722	+10.08	+0.152	−2.826	−0.252	−5.622	+2.622	−7.44	−2.118	−8.088
George Smith	968	758	56.1%	+21.3100	+16.2100	−5.176	+6.398	+1.364	−3.492	+1.160	−1.668	+3.886	+1.878	+7.812
AJ Levine	830	896	48.1%	+5.572	+1.860	−3.770	+2.476	−1.042	+1.034	−1.940	−0.758	−0.546	+2.788	+3.828
Dylan Williams	668	1,058	38.7%	+1.758	+1.760	+0.050	−0.148	−1.042	−0.760	+4.476	+0.544	−0.348	−0.150	−0.754
Augustus Gerhart	579	1,147	33.6%	+16.796	+2.968	−13.896	+0.656	+3.984	+1.824	−1.244	−3.884	+6.696	+1.170	−0.754
Niklas Polonowski	536	1,190	31.0%	−20.24	−17.62	+2.634	−8.24	−5.710	−0.252	−13.24	−2.172	−0.448	−3.76	+3.430
Michael Zanoni	467	1,259	27.0%	−15.78	−10.68	+5.222	−3.618	−1.240	+1.724	−7.414	−0.858	−2.626	−2.614	+0.844
Johnnie Walter	252	1,474	14.6%	+9.082	−7.018	−16.098	−6.86	+4.084	+3.48	+20.9100	−4.086	−6.46	+11.0100	−2.162
Michelangelo Oberti	229	1,497	13.3%	−18.16	−7.716	+10.36	−4.314	+4.486	+1.526	+3.070	+5.56	+0.152	−1.132	−2.664
Bradyn Foster	133	1,593	7.7%	−3.936	−0.648	+3.330	+0.354	+3.180	+2.516	+1.058	+1.038	−3.320	−2.120	−9.690

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sam Brown	1,429	297	82.8%	-10.030	106.242	116.328	49.8%40	29.0%42	15.9%56	31.2%54	53.6%36	70.8%58	12.6%20	25.2%62
Ethan Roberts	1,319	407	76.4%	-8.732	108.248	116.826	51.1%48	30.0%46	16.1%54	29.6%48	54.0%34	69.5%52	13.7%26	25.2%62
Nick Spinoso	1,188	538	68.8%	-15.622	102.834	118.424	49.3%40	28.7%42	16.5%50	27.5%42	53.8%34	67.2%42	12.9%22	22.7%70
George Smith	968	758	56.1%	-1.146	111.756	112.834	52.0%54	30.1%48	15.1%62	29.7%50	52.3%42	71.3%60	14.3%30	28.6%52
AJ Levine	830	896	48.1%	-7.534	105.540	113.034	50.6%46	29.1%42	17.1%46	28.3%44	52.6%40	69.5%52	15.0%34	27.3%56
Dylan Williams	668	1,058	38.7%	-9.332	105.640	114.930	49.2%38	28.9%42	16.2%54	32.0%56	53.3%36	69.6%54	13.6%26	24.9%64
Augustus Gerhart	579	1,147	33.6%	0.246	106.542	106.352	49.7%40	32.1%56	17.8%42	28.5%44	50.6%50	73.9%72	14.3%30	24.9%64
Niklas Polonowski	536	1,190	31.0%	-24.314	92.416	116.726	43.7%18	25.8%30	16.4%50	20.2%22	51.5%46	69.5%52	11.1%12	27.7%54
Michael Zanoni	467	1,259	27.0%	-21.916	96.922	118.722	46.7%28	28.7%42	17.8%40	23.8%30	52.4%42	67.9%44	11.7%16	26.0%60
Johnnie Walter	252	1,474	14.6%	-2.842	98.626	101.464	43.5%18	32.9%58	19.5%30	47.3%84	49.6%56	64.3%32	22.9%84	23.5%68
Michelangelo Oberti	229	1,497	13.3%	-26.012	97.924	123.916	45.6%24	33.3%62	17.9%40	31.9%56	57.8%20	69.8%54	12.6%20	23.1%68
Bradyn Foster	133	1,593	7.7%	-13.926	104.138	118.024	49.6%40	32.5%56	18.9%34	30.2%50	53.9%34	66.7%38	11.7%16	16.5%86

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Sam Brown	1,429	297	82.8%	-12.028	96.622	108.646	47.2%30	32.2%56	19.9%26	20.4%22	50.2%50	64.8%34	18.3%58	25.8%60
Ethan Roberts	1,319	407	76.4%	-16.322	93.016	109.244	43.4%18	28.4%40	18.0%40	28.2%44	50.0%54	70.3%56	13.4%24	25.7%60
Nick Spinoso	1,188	538	68.8%	0.146	108.548	108.446	49.3%38	31.5%52	16.7%48	33.1%58	51.2%48	74.6%74	15.0%34	30.7%46
George Smith	968	758	56.1%	-22.516	95.520	117.924	45.7%24	28.9%42	18.5%36	28.7%46	53.9%34	67.5%44	12.6%20	20.8%74
AJ Levine	830	896	48.1%	-13.026	103.736	116.726	48.2%34	30.0%48	16.1%54	30.2%50	53.3%36	70.0%54	12.3%18	23.5%68
Dylan Williams	668	1,058	38.7%	-11.030	103.936	114.930	49.4%40	30.0%46	16.8%48	27.6%42	52.8%40	69.8%54	13.6%26	25.6%62
Augustus Gerhart	579	1,147	33.6%	-16.522	103.636	120.120	49.1%38	28.3%40	16.0%54	29.7%48	54.4%32	67.2%42	13.2%24	25.6%62
Niklas Polonowski	536	1,190	31.0%	-4.140	110.152	114.132	51.9%52	31.4%52	16.6%50	33.5%60	53.6%36	69.9%54	14.7%32	24.3%66
Michael Zanoni	467	1,259	27.0%	-6.136	107.446	113.634	50.3%46	29.9%46	16.1%54	31.3%54	53.2%38	70.4%56	14.3%30	25.1%62
Johnnie Walter	252	1,474	14.6%	-11.828	105.640	117.426	50.2%46	28.9%42	16.1%54	26.4%38	53.6%36	70.7%58	11.9%16	25.6%62
Michelangelo Oberti	229	1,497	13.3%	-7.934	105.640	113.534	49.9%40	28.9%42	16.4%52	28.9%46	52.3%42	69.7%54	13.8%26	25.7%62
Bradyn Foster	133	1,593	7.7%	-10.030	104.638	114.730	49.3%38	29.3%44	16.4%52	29.2%48	52.9%38	70.0%54	13.8%26	26.1%60

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.