Purdue24-12

Big 10Coach: Matt Painter

24-12NET#17

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Smith	2,078	160	92.8%	−14.510	−3.832	+10.76	−0.050	−9.32	−5.898	−14.22	+8.50	−6.46	+2.386	−21.498
Trey Kaufman-Renn	1,748	491	78.1%	+2.360	+10.094	+7.712	+7.6100	−4.018	−3.892	−6.318	+7.32	+3.884	−0.346	−14.296
Fletcher Loyer	1,728	511	77.2%	−5.432	+1.056	+6.418	+3.584	−4.416	−2.180	−1.344	+5.94	+0.860	−0.346	−10.292
Camden Heide	1,123	1,116	50.2%	−13.910	−9.012	+4.924	−4.014	−7.64	−0.150	+10.394	−0.960	−3.916	−2.218	−1.658
C.J. Cox	1,046	1,192	46.7%	+15.694	+9.992	−5.778	+5.294	+5.190	+0.148	−3.134	−1.464	+0.758	+3.394	+6.018
Caleb Furst	1,011	1,228	45.2%	+7.278	+4.072	−3.266	−0.248	+6.996	−1.268	−8.112	+1.830	+2.878	+1.980	−0.552
Myles Colvin	1,007	1,232	45.0%	−11.216	−10.310	+0.944	−4.412	−5.710	+1.034	+4.176	−0.758	−0.050	−0.740	+4.424
Gicarri Harris	826	1,413	36.9%	−2.642	−0.150	+2.536	−4.412	+3.078	−0.354	+5.582	−1.060	+1.364	−2.614	+7.712
Raleigh Burgess	311	1,928	13.9%	+4.770	−4.726	−9.490	−1.634	+5.390	+5.90	+1.762	−3.986	−7.06	+6.0100	+3.232
Will Berg	196	2,043	8.8%	+29.8100	+7.888	−21.998	+1.466	+7.798	+2.218	−5.024	−16.298	+2.070	−3.010	+6.516

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Smith	2,078	160	92.8%	8.862	119.072	110.242	55.7%70	33.7%62	15.4%60	33.2%58	52.5%40	66.6%38	18.3%60	29.4%50
Trey Kaufman-Renn	1,748	491	78.1%	10.164	121.578	111.338	57.4%76	33.4%62	15.0%62	32.7%58	53.6%36	68.2%46	18.1%58	27.4%56
Fletcher Loyer	1,728	511	77.2%	8.562	119.574	110.940	56.5%72	33.3%58	15.3%60	33.8%60	53.3%36	67.4%42	18.1%58	28.4%52
Camden Heide	1,123	1,116	50.2%	2.952	114.764	111.938	53.6%60	30.5%48	15.8%56	39.5%72	51.5%46	65.3%36	17.0%48	30.1%46
C.J. Cox	1,046	1,192	46.7%	18.176	124.582	106.452	58.4%80	37.1%74	15.9%56	32.5%58	51.1%48	67.6%44	19.9%70	34.1%36
Caleb Furst	1,011	1,228	45.2%	13.770	121.578	107.748	55.6%70	38.0%76	15.1%62	29.9%50	52.9%38	68.7%48	19.1%64	30.5%46
Myles Colvin	1,007	1,232	45.0%	3.754	113.660	109.942	53.2%58	31.3%52	16.4%52	36.4%68	51.5%46	67.2%42	17.8%56	33.3%38
Gicarri Harris	826	1,413	36.9%	8.262	119.274	111.040	53.0%58	36.2%70	15.6%58	37.6%70	51.3%48	68.0%46	16.5%46	35.7%32
Raleigh Burgess	311	1,928	13.9%	13.970	115.264	101.464	54.4%64	38.9%78	20.9%22	35.6%66	48.5%60	61.3%20	23.3%86	33.6%38
Will Berg	196	2,043	8.8%	36.994	126.486	89.586	57.0%74	41.3%86	17.8%40	29.6%48	37.2%92	69.0%50	15.4%38	36.7%30

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Braden Smith	2,078	160	92.8%	23.382	122.880	99.568	55.7%70	43.0%90	21.2%20	47.3%84	43.9%78	73.0%68	16.0%42	50.8%10
Trey Kaufman-Renn	1,748	491	78.1%	7.960	111.456	103.658	49.8%40	37.4%74	18.7%34	39.1%72	46.4%70	64.5%32	18.4%60	41.6%20
Fletcher Loyer	1,728	511	77.2%	14.070	118.572	104.556	53.0%58	37.7%76	17.4%44	35.1%64	47.4%66	66.6%38	18.3%60	38.6%26
Camden Heide	1,123	1,116	50.2%	16.874	123.882	107.050	57.6%78	38.1%76	15.9%56	29.2%46	52.3%42	69.2%50	19.3%66	31.6%42
C.J. Cox	1,046	1,192	46.7%	2.552	114.662	112.136	53.2%58	32.0%56	15.8%56	35.6%66	52.5%40	66.8%42	16.6%46	28.1%54
Caleb Furst	1,011	1,228	45.2%	6.558	117.470	110.940	55.8%70	31.1%52	16.4%52	38.0%70	51.0%48	65.9%38	17.3%52	31.1%44
Myles Colvin	1,007	1,232	45.0%	14.972	123.982	109.044	57.6%78	37.0%74	15.3%60	32.3%56	52.2%42	67.2%42	18.4%60	28.8%52
Gicarri Harris	826	1,413	36.9%	10.866	119.374	108.546	57.3%76	33.2%58	15.9%56	32.1%56	52.2%42	66.7%38	19.1%64	28.0%54
Raleigh Burgess	311	1,928	13.9%	9.162	119.974	110.840	55.9%70	33.6%62	15.0%62	33.9%60	52.4%40	68.3%46	17.3%52	30.4%46
Will Berg	196	2,043	8.8%	7.160	118.672	111.538	55.6%70	33.7%62	15.6%58	34.6%62	53.5%36	66.9%42	18.4%60	30.2%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.