Radford18-13

Big SouthCoach: Darris Nichols

18-13NET#168

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jarvis Moss	1,388	471	74.7%	+19.798	+9.692	−10.192	+0.860	+7.798	−1.876	−0.550	−1.262	+3.784	+2.788	−5.176
Brandon Maclin	1,203	655	64.7%	+9.986	+7.988	−2.060	+3.786	+3.280	−1.268	−0.350	+0.742	+3.986	+0.866	+6.218
Josiah Harris	1,090	769	58.6%	+9.484	+3.068	−6.482	+2.980	+3.380	+1.626	+0.154	−5.794	−2.626	−1.330	+1.540
Truth Harris	1,069	790	57.5%	−11.216	−3.034	+8.212	+0.152	−3.520	+2.120	+10.394	+4.410	−4.614	−0.346	−0.954
Isaiah Gaines	989	869	53.2%	+11.188	+7.586	−3.670	+0.454	+9.4100	−0.050	+8.490	−2.172	−2.526	−0.150	−1.156
Ibu Yamazaki	944	914	50.8%	+2.260	−3.334	−5.578	−2.426	−0.844	−0.964	−8.810	−3.080	+2.474	+0.154	−2.866
David Early	739	1,120	39.8%	−1.046	−0.946	+0.148	+1.770	−4.316	+1.230	+6.184	+1.136	+0.658	−0.544	−9.792
TJ NeSmith	597	1,262	32.1%	−12.414	−4.328	+8.112	−1.832	−6.56	−3.088	−16.82	+8.10	+5.492	−0.936	−9.290
Zion Walker	392	1,467	21.1%	−19.46	−4.826	+14.72	−3.022	+0.454	+0.148	−6.916	−0.250	−6.96	−4.64	+4.126
Chace Davis	294	1,565	15.8%	−1.544	−7.516	−6.180	−2.922	−6.56	−2.280	−4.228	−3.282	+0.456	+2.688	+2.436
Jonas Sirtautas	250	1,609	13.5%	−6.328	−1.046	+5.422	+1.768	−12.12	−1.268	+22.2100	+1.336	+1.062	+0.356	+17.92
Tony Felder	228	1,631	12.3%	−12.812	−9.610	+3.232	−5.210	+5.692	+3.76	−8.212	+2.822	+0.860	+1.778	+5.222

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jarvis Moss	1,388	471	74.7%	8.762	117.670	108.846	52.2%54	38.4%76	17.4%44	40.8%76	50.8%50	68.5%48	17.7%54	35.7%32
Brandon Maclin	1,203	655	64.7%	7.260	117.970	110.740	53.3%60	37.6%76	17.4%44	40.8%76	51.4%46	69.0%50	17.3%52	39.3%24
Josiah Harris	1,090	769	58.6%	7.560	116.468	108.844	53.2%58	37.9%76	18.4%36	41.0%76	48.9%58	66.6%38	16.4%44	37.6%28
Truth Harris	1,069	790	57.5%	-1.146	113.862	114.930	52.1%54	35.0%66	18.7%34	45.5%82	52.9%38	65.6%36	16.8%48	36.6%30
Isaiah Gaines	989	869	53.2%	8.962	118.672	109.842	52.2%54	40.8%84	17.8%40	44.8%82	50.2%50	66.4%38	16.9%48	36.5%30
Ibu Yamazaki	944	914	50.8%	4.856	113.560	108.746	50.9%46	36.2%70	17.4%44	36.7%68	49.6%56	68.7%48	17.0%50	35.6%32
David Early	739	1,120	39.8%	3.152	114.662	111.538	53.1%58	33.8%62	18.5%36	44.7%82	51.8%44	67.9%46	16.7%46	31.3%44
TJ NeSmith	597	1,262	32.1%	-4.840	112.258	117.026	50.8%46	32.1%56	15.7%56	29.8%50	56.6%24	71.3%60	16.3%44	30.8%44
Zion Walker	392	1,467	21.1%	-11.828	111.456	123.116	49.7%40	36.8%74	17.9%40	35.5%66	51.0%48	62.1%24	13.3%24	40.2%22
Chace Davis	294	1,565	15.8%	2.452	108.848	106.452	49.6%40	31.1%52	16.0%54	37.4%68	48.4%60	67.9%44	19.1%64	39.0%26
Jonas Sirtautas	250	1,609	13.5%	-1.844	114.362	116.128	53.5%60	25.9%30	16.8%48	60.5%94	52.2%42	68.4%48	17.2%50	52.7%10
Tony Felder	228	1,631	12.3%	-7.634	106.744	114.232	47.5%32	41.3%86	21.1%20	33.8%60	53.6%36	68.2%46	18.4%60	41.6%20

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jarvis Moss	1,388	471	74.7%	-11.028	107.946	118.922	51.4%50	30.7%50	19.1%32	41.3%76	52.0%44	64.8%34	15.0%34	40.7%22
Brandon Maclin	1,203	655	64.7%	-2.842	110.052	112.834	49.6%40	34.4%64	18.6%36	41.1%76	50.7%50	65.1%34	16.4%44	33.1%38
Josiah Harris	1,090	769	58.6%	-1.944	113.360	115.230	50.4%46	34.6%64	16.9%48	40.9%76	54.5%32	69.1%50	17.7%54	36.1%32
Truth Harris	1,069	790	57.5%	10.164	116.968	106.750	52.0%52	38.5%78	16.6%50	35.3%64	48.6%60	70.2%56	17.1%50	37.6%28
Isaiah Gaines	989	869	53.2%	-2.344	111.154	113.434	51.8%52	31.4%52	17.8%40	36.4%68	52.3%42	69.0%50	17.0%48	37.6%28
Ibu Yamazaki	944	914	50.8%	2.652	116.868	114.232	53.3%60	36.9%74	18.3%38	45.6%82	52.6%40	66.3%38	16.9%48	38.5%26
David Early	739	1,120	39.8%	4.154	115.566	111.438	51.4%50	38.1%76	17.3%44	38.6%72	50.7%50	67.3%42	17.2%50	41.0%22
TJ NeSmith	597	1,262	32.1%	7.760	116.568	108.844	52.7%56	38.6%78	18.8%34	46.6%84	48.5%60	66.0%38	17.2%50	40.0%24
Zion Walker	392	1,467	21.1%	7.760	116.166	108.546	52.7%56	36.4%72	17.8%40	42.4%78	51.2%48	69.0%50	17.9%56	36.2%32
Chace Davis	294	1,565	15.8%	3.954	116.366	112.436	52.5%56	37.6%76	18.1%38	41.6%76	51.6%46	67.5%44	16.5%46	36.7%30
Jonas Sirtautas	250	1,609	13.5%	4.554	115.364	110.740	51.9%52	37.9%76	18.0%40	38.3%70	51.0%48	67.4%42	16.9%48	34.8%34
Tony Felder	228	1,631	12.3%	5.356	116.366	111.040	52.7%56	35.7%70	17.4%44	42.0%78	50.8%50	67.5%42	16.7%46	36.4%30

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.