Rice11-18

AmericanCoach: Rob Lanier

11-18NET#256

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jalen Smith	1,492	344	81.3%	−9.518	−5.920	+3.628	−0.346	−0.448	+1.920	−3.134	−0.352	−0.346	−1.526	+8.410
Trae Broadnax	1,420	416	77.3%	+17.296	+14.198	−3.166	+2.980	+3.078	−4.396	+8.190	−5.090	−1.932	−1.822	−0.452
Nick Anderson	1,364	472	74.3%	+10.386	+13.598	+3.230	+7.698	−6.28	−5.798	+2.768	+0.938	+1.768	−2.118	+9.010
Cam Carroll	1,068	768	58.2%	+11.490	+7.688	−3.870	+3.182	+0.758	−1.472	−3.830	−1.768	−2.130	+2.284	−0.250
Eternity Eguagie	802	1,034	43.7%	−0.150	+0.554	+0.546	+1.062	+2.272	+3.18	+14.598	−0.656	−0.446	−0.936	+5.222
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	764	1,071	41.6%	+3.464	+5.380	+1.938	−0.644	+4.588	−3.290	−2.338	+2.722	−2.030	+0.052	−20.298
Stephen Giwa	697	1,139	38.0%	+5.170	+0.756	−4.472	+2.576	+1.768	+3.010	−7.116	−4.086	−1.634	+1.474	+6.416
Andrew Akuchie	613	1,222	33.4%	−1.844	−9.112	−7.386	−6.56	−2.230	−1.876	−0.350	−3.280	+4.390	+1.068	+9.58
Bodey Howell	337	1,498	18.4%	−15.28	−12.86	+2.336	−5.310	−2.528	+0.738	−10.28	+1.730	−4.414	+1.272	−10.692
Dallas Hobbs	242	1,593	13.2%	−19.36	−8.814	+10.56	−4.812	+1.466	+3.38	+0.656	+8.90	+1.668	+1.778	+9.88
Jordan Williams	193	1,643	10.5%	−21.14	−17.42	+3.728	−4.612	−2.132	+9.60	+10.794	+7.32	+8.398	+0.254	−7.986
Trey Patterson	160	1,675	8.7%	−9.818	−6.320	+3.530	+1.770	−5.88	+3.110	−9.110	+5.46	+4.088	−1.722	−18.898

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jalen Smith	1,492	344	81.3%	-8.432	105.236	113.634	48.7%34	35.1%70	18.2%32	32.5%48	50.7%52	65.5%30	15.4%44	40.8%28
Trae Broadnax	1,420	416	77.3%	-2.840	109.548	112.238	49.4%36	35.9%72	16.8%40	34.9%54	49.7%58	65.1%30	15.2%44	39.1%32
Nick Anderson	1,364	472	74.3%	-4.038	109.848	113.734	50.7%42	33.4%66	16.4%46	33.8%52	51.0%50	66.0%32	15.1%42	41.6%26
Cam Carroll	1,068	768	58.2%	-1.842	109.548	111.340	50.1%42	35.5%72	17.2%38	31.6%46	50.1%52	64.7%28	16.6%54	39.1%32
Eternity Eguagie	802	1,034	43.7%	-6.734	106.540	113.236	49.3%36	36.5%74	19.6%22	41.6%68	50.4%52	65.3%30	15.1%42	42.1%26
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	764	1,071	41.6%	-4.738	109.446	114.034	48.5%32	37.7%78	16.0%48	31.8%46	52.3%44	64.4%28	15.6%46	27.8%62
Stephen Giwa	697	1,139	38.0%	-3.540	106.740	110.244	50.3%42	36.3%74	19.7%22	28.7%38	48.3%62	64.6%28	16.5%52	43.2%24
Andrew Akuchie	613	1,222	33.4%	-7.932	100.226	108.148	44.5%18	33.8%66	16.6%42	32.9%48	48.6%62	68.4%42	16.3%50	45.6%20
Bodey Howell	337	1,498	18.4%	-19.018	95.818	114.832	44.4%18	33.2%62	18.4%30	24.8%26	52.2%44	61.9%20	16.6%54	30.5%54
Dallas Hobbs	242	1,593	13.2%	-23.414	98.724	122.118	44.6%18	36.4%74	20.6%18	33.6%52	58.6%20	67.0%38	17.1%58	47.8%16
Jordan Williams	193	1,643	10.5%	-25.512	90.712	116.328	44.6%18	33.3%66	26.4%2	42.9%70	57.3%24	73.0%64	15.8%48	32.2%48
Trey Patterson	160	1,675	8.7%	-15.522	100.526	116.130	50.4%42	29.9%50	20.6%18	24.8%26	55.7%30	69.2%46	14.1%34	22.1%78

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jalen Smith	1,492	344	81.3%	1.148	111.152	110.044	49.0%34	35.5%72	16.3%46	35.6%56	51.0%50	65.8%32	16.9%56	32.3%48
Trae Broadnax	1,420	416	77.3%	-19.918	95.418	115.330	46.5%26	32.9%62	21.1%16	26.8%32	54.7%34	67.0%38	17.1%58	39.5%30
Nick Anderson	1,364	472	74.3%	-14.324	96.220	110.642	43.2%16	39.7%84	22.0%12	31.1%44	50.1%52	64.3%26	17.2%58	32.5%48
Cam Carroll	1,068	768	58.2%	-13.326	101.930	115.132	46.9%26	34.8%68	18.6%28	35.4%56	51.8%46	66.8%38	14.4%36	39.3%32
Eternity Eguagie	802	1,034	43.7%	-6.634	106.138	112.736	48.4%32	34.3%66	16.4%44	27.1%34	51.1%50	65.7%32	16.0%48	36.9%36
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.	764	1,071	41.6%	-8.032	104.134	112.138	49.0%34	33.2%62	19.1%26	34.1%52	49.6%58	66.4%32	15.6%46	48.1%16
Stephen Giwa	697	1,139	38.0%	-8.632	106.038	114.632	47.8%30	34.6%68	16.7%42	35.8%56	52.3%44	66.2%32	15.1%42	36.7%36
Andrew Akuchie	613	1,222	33.4%	-6.136	109.346	115.430	51.0%44	36.0%72	18.4%30	33.2%50	51.8%46	64.1%26	15.3%44	36.1%38
Bodey Howell	337	1,498	18.4%	-3.940	108.644	112.538	49.8%36	35.7%72	17.7%34	35.1%54	50.5%52	66.3%32	15.4%44	41.1%28
Dallas Hobbs	242	1,593	13.2%	-4.138	107.442	111.640	49.4%36	35.0%68	17.4%36	33.0%50	49.7%58	65.4%30	15.4%44	38.0%34
Jordan Williams	193	1,643	10.5%	-4.438	108.144	112.538	49.2%36	35.4%70	16.8%42	32.2%48	50.0%58	64.7%28	15.6%46	40.0%28
Trey Patterson	160	1,675	8.7%	-5.836	106.840	112.638	48.6%34	35.7%72	17.5%36	33.9%52	50.3%52	65.2%30	15.8%48	40.9%28

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.