Richmond23-10

A10Coach: Chris Mooney

23-10NET#79

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan King	1,773	213	89.3%	+3.664	+0.854	−2.864	−1.932	+2.270	−1.166	+4.074	−4.086	+2.474	−3.68	−5.076
Dji Bailey	1,535	451	77.3%	+2.360	+1.358	−1.054	−1.634	+3.480	+0.048	+9.492	+1.138	−0.248	+1.068	−6.280
Neal Quinn	1,362	624	68.6%	−2.342	+0.854	+3.132	+0.052	−5.810	−4.796	−3.532	+0.742	−2.528	−0.150	−0.148
Isaiah Bigelow	1,336	650	67.3%	+0.150	+0.150	−0.150	−1.832	−5.710	−3.992	+6.584	−2.372	+1.162	−2.616	+2.436
DeLonnie Hunt	1,044	943	52.5%	−3.836	+2.464	+6.218	−2.626	−0.646	−2.278	+13.898	+4.710	+0.252	+1.068	+0.644
Mikkel Tyne	844	1,142	42.5%	−0.848	−1.742	−0.954	+2.476	−4.616	+0.738	−10.88	−1.464	−1.438	+0.966	+3.530
Tyler Harris	647	1,339	32.6%	−3.438	+3.066	+6.418	+4.690	+2.876	+4.64	−3.632	+3.120	−0.646	−0.446	+2.336
Mike Walz	534	1,453	26.9%	−1.644	−5.026	−3.366	−1.634	+6.092	+4.06	−7.416	−0.252	+3.784	−0.642	−5.476
Jason Roche	519	1,467	26.1%	+3.162	+4.774	+1.640	+3.384	+3.380	+1.130	−3.234	+0.742	−1.636	+1.676	+5.422
Aidan Noyes	239	1,747	12.0%	+31.3100	+14.798	−16.698	+6.796	+2.270	−3.086	−2.140	−9.898	+3.480	−3.68	−6.180

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan King	1,773	213	89.3%	8.160	109.250	101.164	52.4%56	21.6%18	12.5%78	26.6%40	46.8%66	70.2%56	16.9%50	25.7%58
Dji Bailey	1,535	451	77.3%	8.260	109.452	101.264	52.3%56	22.2%18	12.6%76	28.3%46	47.5%64	69.9%54	17.5%54	24.9%62
Neal Quinn	1,362	624	68.6%	7.058	109.452	102.460	52.6%58	19.6%12	11.2%84	25.1%36	47.4%64	69.1%50	17.3%52	26.2%58
Isaiah Bigelow	1,336	650	67.3%	7.860	109.250	101.464	52.1%54	19.6%12	11.4%84	28.3%46	46.5%68	70.3%56	16.5%46	27.1%56
DeLonnie Hunt	1,044	943	52.5%	5.956	110.354	104.456	51.4%50	21.1%16	11.6%82	32.9%58	49.5%54	70.0%54	17.8%56	26.6%56
Mikkel Tyne	844	1,142	42.5%	7.360	108.248	100.964	54.0%64	18.7%10	13.0%74	20.0%22	46.4%68	69.1%50	17.9%56	28.3%50
Tyler Harris	647	1,339	32.6%	5.556	111.256	105.752	55.7%70	23.4%22	15.8%54	23.7%32	49.3%54	69.5%52	17.1%50	27.8%52
Mike Walz	534	1,453	26.9%	6.658	105.542	99.068	51.5%52	25.8%30	15.6%56	20.8%24	47.1%64	72.6%66	16.9%50	22.3%70
Jason Roche	519	1,467	26.1%	10.064	112.760	102.660	55.1%68	23.9%24	13.5%72	23.8%32	47.7%62	68.7%48	18.5%62	30.3%44
Aidan Noyes	239	1,747	12.0%	35.392	122.180	86.888	58.5%82	23.3%22	10.0%88	24.3%34	38.6%90	72.9%68	14.2%30	20.9%74

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Jordan King	1,773	213	89.3%	4.654	108.548	103.956	54.3%64	19.5%12	13.6%70	22.6%28	50.8%48	67.8%44	20.5%74	30.8%44
Dji Bailey	1,535	451	77.3%	6.058	108.248	102.260	53.9%64	18.7%10	12.6%76	18.9%18	46.3%68	70.1%56	16.5%46	31.2%42
Neal Quinn	1,362	624	68.6%	9.462	108.650	99.368	52.6%58	25.4%28	15.9%54	28.6%46	46.8%66	71.7%62	17.4%54	26.3%58
Isaiah Bigelow	1,336	650	67.3%	7.660	109.150	101.562	53.8%64	25.3%28	15.2%58	21.8%26	48.8%56	69.2%50	19.1%64	24.6%62
DeLonnie Hunt	1,044	943	52.5%	9.764	107.948	98.270	54.0%64	21.7%18	13.8%70	19.1%20	44.8%74	69.8%54	16.8%48	25.9%58
Mikkel Tyne	844	1,142	42.5%	8.160	109.952	101.862	51.6%52	23.3%22	12.3%78	30.8%52	47.8%62	70.5%56	16.9%50	24.8%62
Tyler Harris	647	1,339	32.6%	8.862	108.248	99.368	51.2%50	20.6%16	11.1%84	27.3%42	46.2%68	70.1%56	17.4%54	25.5%60
Mike Walz	534	1,453	26.9%	8.260	110.554	102.360	53.1%60	19.7%12	11.6%82	28.2%46	47.3%64	69.0%50	17.5%54	27.7%54
Jason Roche	519	1,467	26.1%	6.958	107.948	101.064	51.8%54	20.6%16	12.3%78	27.0%42	47.1%64	70.3%56	16.9%50	24.9%62
Aidan Noyes	239	1,747	12.0%	4.054	107.446	103.458	51.8%54	21.2%16	13.0%74	26.4%40	48.5%58	69.5%52	17.7%56	27.0%56

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.