Rutgers15-17

Big 10Coach: Steve Pikiell

15-17NET#82

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Ace Bailey	1,589	496	76.2%	+10.086	+4.576	−5.578	−1.238	+5.892	−0.760	−2.238	−4.388	+0.354	+1.576	+3.630
Dylan Harper	1,505	580	72.2%	+4.368	+6.984	+2.634	+3.182	−0.150	+0.148	+8.690	−0.352	+2.374	−4.44	−2.162
Jeremiah Williams	1,192	893	57.2%	−8.622	−10.110	−1.558	−5.68	+2.574	+3.110	+6.484	+0.840	−0.250	+0.560	−0.150
Lathan Sommerville	1,085	999	52.1%	−8.322	−8.912	−0.652	−4.712	−5.112	−0.660	+0.858	+2.028	+0.254	+1.474	−6.582
Jamichael Davis	929	1,155	44.6%	+8.982	+4.574	−4.574	+2.476	−5.410	−3.492	+8.390	−1.970	−0.646	+0.458	−4.774
Jordan Derkack	839	1,245	40.3%	+1.958	+1.660	−0.350	−1.436	+1.768	−0.964	+6.584	+0.740	−1.734	+3.494	+7.812
Tyson Acuff	811	1,273	38.9%	−2.242	+2.162	+4.426	+2.778	−0.250	−0.252	−7.914	+2.522	+1.364	−0.838	+2.236
Zach Martini	798	1,286	38.3%	+9.184	+3.370	−5.878	+1.466	−2.032	−2.078	−4.726	−4.288	+3.784	−2.316	+4.724
Dylan Grant	628	1,457	30.1%	−21.64	−11.58	+10.28	−7.24	+5.492	+2.714	−7.714	+3.614	−2.032	−0.640	+9.48
Emmanuel Ogbole	490	1,594	23.5%	+7.678	+6.282	−1.456	+7.498	+3.380	+3.110	−7.714	+0.544	+2.474	−0.642	−3.468
PJ Hayes IV	421	1,663	20.2%	+0.452	+0.856	+0.546	+1.364	−1.538	−0.152	+1.260	+1.038	−2.130	+1.372	−11.494
Bryce Dortch	127	1,957	6.1%	+1.658	+12.698	+11.06	+14.4100	−5.410	+0.738	−13.34	−0.960	−13.42	−0.246	−2.966

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Ace Bailey	1,589	496	76.2%	1.450	112.558	111.140	50.3%46	34.6%64	15.6%58	35.6%66	52.1%42	65.9%38	17.9%56	31.6%42
Dylan Harper	1,505	580	72.2%	0.246	113.360	113.134	51.5%50	33.2%58	15.8%56	38.6%72	53.0%38	66.5%38	16.3%44	30.1%46
Jeremiah Williams	1,192	893	57.2%	-4.740	107.144	111.838	48.1%34	34.3%64	17.1%46	38.9%72	53.5%36	65.8%36	17.8%56	30.6%46
Lathan Sommerville	1,085	999	52.1%	-5.038	107.144	112.136	48.3%34	30.7%50	15.5%58	36.5%68	54.1%34	66.0%38	18.2%58	27.5%56
Jamichael Davis	929	1,155	44.6%	4.054	113.962	109.942	51.9%52	30.3%48	13.9%70	40.8%76	52.1%42	65.5%36	17.8%56	28.1%54
Jordan Derkack	839	1,245	40.3%	0.246	112.458	112.236	49.8%40	34.2%64	15.3%60	40.0%74	53.6%36	64.9%34	19.6%68	35.5%32
Tyson Acuff	811	1,273	38.9%	-2.344	112.758	115.030	52.2%54	33.1%58	15.7%58	31.4%54	54.7%30	66.7%38	17.1%50	32.0%42
Zach Martini	798	1,286	38.3%	4.754	113.560	108.846	51.5%50	32.0%54	14.5%66	33.2%58	50.6%50	68.1%46	16.1%42	33.6%38
Dylan Grant	628	1,457	30.1%	-16.122	103.436	119.522	45.6%24	36.9%74	17.7%42	30.8%52	55.7%26	64.4%32	17.1%50	37.4%28
Emmanuel Ogbole	490	1,594	23.5%	4.956	116.266	111.338	56.3%72	35.8%70	18.2%38	30.2%50	53.5%36	67.7%44	17.1%50	28.1%54
PJ Hayes IV	421	1,663	20.2%	-0.746	112.156	112.834	51.6%50	32.0%56	15.7%58	37.1%68	53.9%34	64.2%30	18.6%60	21.7%74
Bryce Dortch	127	1,957	6.1%	0.648	123.382	122.716	64.1%94	28.1%40	16.5%50	23.6%30	52.3%42	53.3%6	17.3%52	28.0%54

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Ace Bailey	1,589	496	76.2%	-8.632	108.046	116.526	51.6%50	28.7%42	16.3%52	37.8%70	56.4%24	65.6%36	16.4%44	28.0%54
Dylan Harper	1,505	580	72.2%	-4.140	106.542	110.540	48.4%34	33.3%62	15.7%56	30.0%50	53.4%36	64.2%30	20.7%74	32.2%42
Jeremiah Williams	1,192	893	57.2%	4.054	117.270	113.234	53.8%62	31.8%54	14.0%70	32.5%58	52.7%40	66.0%38	17.2%50	30.8%44
Lathan Sommerville	1,085	999	52.1%	3.452	116.166	112.734	53.0%58	35.9%70	16.1%54	35.7%66	52.1%42	65.8%36	16.8%48	34.0%36
Jamichael Davis	929	1,155	44.6%	-5.038	109.450	114.432	49.6%40	35.6%68	17.3%44	32.5%58	54.0%34	66.1%38	17.4%52	32.8%40
Jordan Derkack	839	1,245	40.3%	-1.744	110.854	112.536	51.1%48	32.5%56	16.1%54	33.5%60	52.8%38	66.5%38	16.2%44	27.7%54
Tyson Acuff	811	1,273	38.9%	-0.146	110.652	110.740	49.5%40	33.3%62	15.9%56	39.2%72	52.1%42	65.4%36	17.9%56	29.9%48
Zach Martini	798	1,286	38.3%	-4.540	110.152	114.630	50.0%46	34.0%64	16.6%50	37.9%70	54.7%30	64.3%32	18.4%60	28.9%50
Dylan Grant	628	1,457	30.1%	5.556	114.964	109.344	52.9%56	31.5%52	15.0%62	38.5%72	52.1%42	66.4%38	17.7%54	28.0%54
Emmanuel Ogbole	490	1,594	23.5%	-2.842	110.052	112.734	48.9%38	32.5%56	15.1%62	37.9%70	53.0%38	65.3%36	17.7%54	31.5%42
PJ Hayes IV	421	1,663	20.2%	-1.046	111.254	112.336	50.3%46	33.5%62	15.8%56	35.9%66	52.9%38	66.3%38	17.3%52	33.1%38
Bryce Dortch	127	1,957	6.1%	-1.046	110.652	111.738	49.7%40	33.5%62	15.7%56	36.9%68	53.2%38	66.8%42	17.6%54	30.9%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.