Saint Louis12-20

A10Coach: Travis Ford

12-20NET#212

Free sampleSaint Louis is open to everyone. Every other team needs a Season Pass.See Plans

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gibson Jimerson	1,084	117	90.3%	+3.564	+5.980	+2.336	+4.590	+5.390	+2.218	−1.344	−7.996	−10.82	−6.12	+4.724
Terrence Hargrove Jr.	1,006	194	83.8%	+4.768	+8.186	+3.432	+1.364	+0.354	−2.480	+13.298	+2.624	−1.636	+0.458	−8.888
Larry Hughes II	965	235	80.4%	+12.990	+8.688	−4.472	+1.870	−3.920	−5.396	+4.376	+3.616	+2.978	+2.786	−6.982
Cian Medley	609	592	50.7%	−15.98	−9.012	+6.916	−4.512	+1.564	+2.714	−2.340	−0.050	+0.152	−4.16	+10.66
Kellen Thames	496	704	41.3%	+6.976	+6.280	−0.752	+4.088	−1.636	−1.570	−0.748	+1.038	+3.280	+1.472	+9.210
Bradley Ezewiro	485	716	40.4%	+1.958	+3.368	+1.442	+3.080	+0.354	−0.556	−9.410	+5.38	+7.798	+0.052	+0.346
Tim Dalger	366	834	30.5%	−11.814	−12.66	−0.854	−5.010	−2.232	+2.120	−0.250	−3.280	−7.26	+0.660	−10.190
Michael Meadows Jr.	300	900	25.0%	+5.370	−6.720	−12.194	−6.46	−5.710	−3.992	+7.888	−2.978	+4.286	+1.472	−15.096
Bruce Zhang	226	974	18.9%	−23.54	−7.516	+16.02	−4.412	+2.774	+3.012	+0.454	+0.840	−12.32	−1.134	+2.138
Sincere Parker	218	982	18.2%	+24.2100	+10.994	−13.396	+3.082	+4.888	−2.986	−3.730	−5.290	−1.140	+3.894	+4.226
Djordje Curcic	126	1,074	10.5%	−2.042	+2.060	+4.028	+9.9100	−6.78	+5.42	−4.130	+5.28	+9.0100	+1.978	+1.540
Stef van Bussel	119	1,081	9.9%	+7.476	+2.866	−4.672	+1.668	+10.9100	+5.82	−1.444	−3.280	+3.884	−2.120	+11.76

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gibson Jimerson	1,084	117	90.3%	-6.736	110.554	117.126	52.4%56	28.3%40	16.8%48	34.8%64	53.1%36	67.6%44	13.2%26	32.1%40
Terrence Hargrove Jr.	1,006	194	83.8%	-6.336	111.256	117.524	52.2%56	27.8%38	16.2%52	37.1%68	54.3%32	68.2%46	13.9%30	30.2%44
Larry Hughes II	965	235	80.4%	-4.540	111.656	116.128	52.4%56	27.0%34	15.5%56	35.8%66	54.5%30	69.1%50	14.4%32	30.3%44
Cian Medley	609	592	50.7%	-14.824	105.542	120.320	49.8%42	28.4%40	17.9%40	33.8%60	53.8%34	68.5%48	11.8%18	36.8%28
Kellen Thames	496	704	41.3%	-3.042	113.562	116.526	54.3%66	26.8%34	15.7%54	34.5%62	54.4%30	70.4%56	14.6%34	37.2%26
Bradley Ezewiro	485	716	40.4%	-5.936	111.958	117.824	53.8%62	27.9%38	16.3%50	29.4%48	57.1%20	73.4%70	13.8%28	31.9%40
Tim Dalger	366	834	30.5%	-15.224	101.132	116.426	48.5%38	26.3%32	18.0%38	34.8%62	51.6%44	63.6%28	14.2%32	24.8%62
Michael Meadows Jr.	300	900	25.0%	-3.042	104.840	107.946	47.2%32	23.6%22	13.6%70	40.8%76	51.6%44	71.6%62	14.8%36	20.6%76
Bruce Zhang	226	974	18.9%	-26.014	103.838	129.88	48.4%38	29.9%46	19.0%32	35.3%64	54.4%30	58.9%14	12.9%24	33.3%34
Sincere Parker	218	982	18.2%	12.968	118.874	105.950	54.5%66	31.7%54	14.2%66	31.9%56	49.5%54	67.6%44	16.9%50	35.2%32
Djordje Curcic	126	1,074	10.5%	-8.832	111.758	120.520	60.9%88	21.6%18	21.4%20	31.3%54	58.5%16	76.7%82	15.5%40	33.0%36
Stef van Bussel	119	1,081	9.9%	-0.446	112.558	112.834	53.5%62	37.5%76	21.8%18	33.7%60	50.9%46	71.8%64	11.9%18	42.2%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Gibson Jimerson	1,084	117	90.3%	-10.230	104.640	114.830	47.9%36	23.0%22	14.6%64	36.1%66	61.1%10	78.4%86	19.3%66	27.4%54
Terrence Hargrove Jr.	1,006	194	83.8%	-11.028	103.136	114.132	50.9%48	27.5%36	18.6%36	24.0%32	51.6%44	69.7%54	13.5%26	39.0%22
Larry Hughes II	965	235	80.4%	-17.422	103.036	120.420	50.5%48	30.8%52	20.9%22	31.4%54	50.9%46	66.2%38	11.6%18	37.3%26
Cian Medley	609	592	50.7%	1.148	114.464	113.334	54.3%64	27.0%34	15.2%58	36.1%66	53.8%34	68.4%48	15.9%44	26.2%58
Kellen Thames	496	704	41.3%	-9.930	107.346	117.224	50.3%46	28.4%40	17.2%44	35.2%64	53.4%36	67.2%42	13.2%26	28.0%52
Bradley Ezewiro	485	716	40.4%	-7.834	108.650	116.326	50.8%48	27.6%36	16.8%48	38.8%72	51.8%42	65.7%36	13.8%28	31.6%42
Tim Dalger	366	834	30.5%	-3.440	113.762	117.126	53.5%62	28.5%40	15.9%54	35.0%64	54.8%28	70.8%58	13.6%28	34.9%32
Michael Meadows Jr.	300	900	25.0%	-8.434	111.656	119.920	53.6%62	29.3%44	17.6%42	33.0%58	54.6%30	67.4%44	13.5%26	35.5%30
Bruce Zhang	226	974	18.9%	-2.542	111.356	113.832	52.8%58	27.2%36	16.0%52	34.8%64	53.6%34	71.2%60	14.0%30	31.3%42
Sincere Parker	218	982	18.2%	-11.328	107.948	119.322	51.4%50	26.9%34	17.1%46	35.6%66	54.7%30	68.7%48	13.1%24	31.0%42
Djordje Curcic	126	1,074	10.5%	-6.836	109.752	116.526	51.0%50	28.3%40	16.0%52	35.3%64	53.3%36	67.6%44	13.6%28	31.5%42
Stef van Bussel	119	1,081	9.9%	-7.834	109.652	117.424	51.8%54	26.6%34	16.0%52	35.1%64	54.1%32	68.1%46	14.0%30	30.5%44

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.