SIU Edwardsville14-16

OVCCoach: Brian Barone

14-16NET#275

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,637	260	86.3%	−9.220	+2.764	+11.96	+0.656	+0.152	+0.442	+9.792	+6.74	+2.474	−5.14	−2.262
Shamar Wright	1,580	316	83.3%	+2.258	+4.674	+2.436	−1.040	+1.766	−2.380	+6.284	+1.930	−2.232	+0.458	−11.292
Ray'Sean Taylor	1,506	391	79.4%	−7.226	+7.586	+14.82	+4.992	+1.464	+1.920	+9.192	+9.50	−2.430	−1.134	−0.350
Lamar Wright	1,412	484	74.5%	+13.992	+9.590	−4.472	+2.172	+2.270	−3.388	+4.576	−1.968	+6.394	−3.68	−9.890
Terrance Thompson	916	981	48.3%	−5.032	+2.966	+7.814	−1.140	+1.866	−0.658	+7.386	+3.020	−2.826	−2.914	−19.698
Desmond Polk	862	1,034	45.5%	+0.150	−6.420	−6.580	+1.970	−5.512	+2.120	−10.48	+0.148	+3.482	+5.598	+15.12
Brian Taylor II	491	1,406	25.9%	−0.448	−5.026	−4.774	−0.446	−2.232	−0.148	−11.76	−5.090	−3.222	+2.078	+11.66
Arnas Sakenis	456	1,440	24.1%	+3.966	−4.926	−8.888	−0.248	−1.240	+1.330	−5.124	−5.892	+0.354	−1.528	−7.886
Eddiean Tirado	205	1,692	10.8%	−0.548	−4.826	−4.372	−3.518	−0.844	−2.280	−11.26	−1.868	+1.162	+3.592	+9.48
Dorion Staples	138	1,758	7.3%	−27.12	−16.24	+10.96	−10.12	+7.496	+2.912	−7.416	+3.220	+2.978	−3.310	+22.30
Ethan Yancy	119	1,777	6.3%	+23.398	+2.162	−21.298	−0.942	−1.538	−2.076	+8.790	−8.598	−1.042	+8.2100	+18.10

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,637	260	86.3%	-3.640	105.140	108.844	47.1%32	32.8%58	16.2%52	33.6%60	51.3%46	68.9%50	17.4%54	35.6%30
Shamar Wright	1,580	316	83.3%	-2.042	105.642	107.546	46.8%30	33.1%58	15.8%54	33.2%58	50.7%48	68.2%46	18.2%58	34.1%34
Ray'Sean Taylor	1,506	391	79.4%	-3.840	106.344	110.140	48.0%36	33.1%58	16.5%50	34.2%62	52.3%40	68.0%46	17.9%56	35.8%30
Lamar Wright	1,412	484	74.5%	1.248	107.246	106.050	47.5%34	33.3%62	15.3%58	33.3%60	49.9%54	70.1%56	17.2%52	33.4%34
Terrance Thompson	916	981	48.3%	-4.938	106.344	111.138	46.4%30	33.7%64	15.8%54	36.0%66	51.8%42	67.1%42	16.6%48	26.5%56
Desmond Polk	862	1,034	45.5%	-2.342	101.332	103.658	48.0%36	29.7%46	17.3%44	26.5%40	50.5%48	70.5%56	21.1%76	44.7%16
Brian Taylor II	491	1,406	25.9%	-2.642	101.032	103.758	46.7%30	31.2%52	16.1%52	23.6%32	46.6%68	66.2%38	19.5%68	44.6%16
Arnas Sakenis	456	1,440	24.1%	0.648	101.132	100.466	46.8%30	31.9%56	17.1%46	28.4%46	46.0%70	68.8%48	17.0%50	30.0%46
Eddiean Tirado	205	1,692	10.8%	-2.842	100.530	103.358	43.9%20	32.1%56	14.2%66	22.3%28	48.7%58	69.5%52	21.3%78	44.3%16
Dorion Staples	138	1,758	7.3%	-27.512	89.814	117.324	37.7%8	39.6%82	18.8%34	25.4%36	53.4%36	71.2%60	15.0%36	56.7%6
Ethan Yancy	119	1,777	6.3%	19.678	106.844	87.288	46.2%28	31.4%54	14.3%66	40.4%74	42.4%82	67.6%44	25.8%92	52.9%8

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Damarco Minor	1,637	260	86.3%	5.656	102.534	96.974	46.5%30	32.7%58	15.8%54	23.9%32	44.6%76	66.4%38	22.5%82	37.7%26
Shamar Wright	1,580	316	83.3%	-4.240	100.932	105.154	47.9%36	31.4%52	18.0%38	27.0%42	48.8%56	70.3%56	17.7%56	45.2%14
Ray'Sean Taylor	1,506	391	79.4%	3.452	98.826	95.376	43.2%18	31.7%54	14.6%64	25.1%36	42.8%82	70.4%56	19.0%64	36.1%30
Lamar Wright	1,412	484	74.5%	-12.726	97.726	110.440	45.4%24	31.2%52	18.6%36	28.8%48	51.8%42	63.8%30	20.8%74	43.2%18
Terrance Thompson	916	981	48.3%	0.146	103.436	103.358	47.5%34	32.0%56	16.4%50	28.7%46	48.8%56	69.9%54	19.5%68	46.1%14
Desmond Polk	862	1,034	45.5%	-2.442	107.746	110.140	46.1%28	35.2%68	15.2%60	36.9%68	50.3%48	67.1%42	15.6%40	29.6%46
Brian Taylor II	491	1,406	25.9%	-2.342	106.144	108.446	47.1%32	33.4%62	16.2%52	35.3%64	51.6%44	69.4%52	17.6%54	32.9%38
Arnas Sakenis	456	1,440	24.1%	-3.340	105.944	109.244	47.0%32	33.1%58	15.8%54	33.4%60	51.8%42	68.4%48	18.5%60	37.8%26
Eddiean Tirado	205	1,692	10.8%	-2.342	105.342	107.646	47.4%34	32.9%58	16.4%50	33.5%60	50.6%48	68.4%48	17.7%56	34.9%32
Dorion Staples	138	1,758	7.3%	-0.446	106.044	106.450	47.8%34	32.1%56	15.9%54	32.8%58	50.2%50	68.3%48	18.3%60	34.4%34
Ethan Yancy	119	1,777	6.3%	-3.840	104.640	108.446	47.0%32	32.9%58	16.3%52	31.7%56	50.8%48	68.6%48	17.6%54	34.9%32

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

SIU EdwardsvilleSIUE14-16

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

SIU Edwardsville14-16