Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logoTarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo

Tarleton St.5-10

WACCoach: Billy Gillispie

5-10NET#230
Schedule
WLTexas A&M logoTexas A&M logoLAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoWLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLGrand Canyon logoGrand Canyon logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoLCal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoLWeber St. logoWeber St. logoWLUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWUtah Valley logoUtah Valley logoWWWUtah Tech logoUtah Tech logoLUtah Tech logoUtah Tech logoLNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWNew Mexico St. logoNew Mexico St. logoWUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logoWUT Rio Grande Valley logoUT Rio Grande Valley logo

Team Stats

15 games
  • Net Rating-7.525
  • Offensive Rating112.069
  • Defensive Rating119.511
  • Pace57.08
  • Effective FG%48.6%32
  • Off Rebound Pct19.3%3
  • Turnover Pct21.3%35
  • FT Attempt Rate38.1%92

Team Stats

15 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-7.525
  • Offensive Rating112.069
  • Defensive Rating119.511
  • Pace57.08
  • Effective FG%48.6%32
  • Off Rebound Pct19.3%3
  • Turnover Pct21.3%35
  • FT Attempt Rate38.1%92

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct33.3%22
  • Point Margin / Game-4.328
  • Points / Game63.99
  • Points Allowed / Game68.173
  • 1st Half Margin-0.148
  • 2nd Half Margin-4.211
  • Avg Largest Lead9.241
  • Avg Largest Deficit12.035

Box Score

  • Points / Game63.99
  • Rebounds / Game27.81
  • Assists / Game11.318
  • ORebs / Game6.12
  • DRebs / Game21.74
  • Steals / Game6.762
  • Blocks / Game2.319
  • Turnovers / Game12.172
  • PFs / Game20.36

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game22.04
  • FGAs / Game50.91
  • Field Goal Pct43.3%45
  • 2PMs / Game16.525
  • 2PAs / Game36.352
  • 2-Point Pct45.6%12
  • 3PMs / Game5.58
  • 3PAs / Game14.61
  • 3-Point Pct37.4%93
  • FTMs / Game14.477
  • FTAs / Game19.470
  • Free Throw Pct74.2%81

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s51.8%60
  • % Pts from 3s25.7%13
  • % Pts from FTs22.5%96
  • Paint Pts / Game12.119
  • % Pts in Paint19.0%24
  • Fast Break Pts / Game3.726
  • % Pts on Fast Break5.8%31
  • Points off TOVs / Game13.576
  • % Pts off TOVs21.2%89
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.329
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game32.56

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %53.8%52
  • Points / Shot1.2670
  • 3-Point Att Rate28.7%6
  • Assist Pct51.5%47
  • Assists / 100 Poss19.954
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.93x44
  • PF Drawn / Game18.677

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%52.1%26
  • Opp True Shooting %57.1%12
  • Opp Field Goal Pct43.4%55
  • Opp 2-Point Pct50.0%49
  • Opp 3-Point Pct36.3%16
  • Opp 3PA Rate48.5%0
  • Opp FT Att Rate45.5%2
  • Opp Points / Shot1.373

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game68.173
  • Paint Pts Allowed14.074
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed6.631
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed11.161
  • Opp Assist Pct71.8%0
  • TOVs Forced / Game15.490

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct68.3%14
  • Turnovers Forced Pct27.0%96
  • Steal Pct11.8%87
  • Block Pct4.0%32
  • Hakeem Pct15.8%70
  • PF Efficiency1.09x23
  • Steals / PF0.33x32
  • Blocks / PF0.11x7

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 347 D-I teams
  • #12Opp TOV%23.5%
  • #253P%37.4%
  • #29FTAR38.1%
  • #138TOV%18.5%
  • #177TS%53.1%
  • #184AST%51.5%
  • #192SOS-1.4
  • #195FB Pts %9.7%
Where they rank bestof 347 D-I teams
  • #12Opp TOV%23.5%
  • #253P%37.4%
  • #29FTAR38.1%
  • #138TOV%18.5%
  • #177TS%53.1%
  • #184AST%51.5%
  • #192SOS-1.4
  • #195FB Pts %9.7%
Where they rank worstof 347 D-I teams
  • #338OREB%19.3%
  • #3183PM Diff-49
  • #311REB Diff-114
  • #301Opp OREB%31.7%
  • #292Opp 3P%36.3%
  • #260Paint Pts %31.4%
  • #260Adj ORtg98.8
  • #259Opp eFG%52.1%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2020-21
Find Similar
  1. 1Georgia St. logoGeorgia St. logoGeorgia St. 2015-1614-14Sun Belt77
  2. 2UC Davis logoUC Davis logoUC Davis 2017-1820-11Big West72
  3. 3Northwestern St. logoNorthwestern St. logoNorthwestern St. 2025-268-22Southland66
  4. 4TCU logoTCU logoTCU 2013-148-22Big 1266
  5. 5California logoCalifornia logoCalifornia 2018-198-23Pac 1265
  6. 6Abilene Christian logoAbilene Christian logoAbilene Christian 2023-2415-18WAC65
  7. 7Indiana St. logoIndiana St. logoIndiana St. 2018-1913-16MVC65
  8. 8Montana logoMontana logoMontana 2020-2110-13Big Sky65
  9. 9UMKC logoUMKC logoUMKC 2021-2215-12Summit63
  10. 10Indiana St. logoIndiana St. logoIndiana St. 2020-2114-10MVC62
Schedule
Loading the schedule
Montre' Gipson headshotMontre'GipsonJrTahj Small headshotTahjSmallJr
KDKonstantinDotsenkoSo
Shamir Bogues headshotShamirBoguesFrFreddy Hicks headshotFreddyHicksFrSDShakurDanielJr
JJJonathan JacksonJr.Sr
CSCalebStarksJr
Joey Madimba headshotJoeyMadimbaFrSSSamSparksFrRGRomanGarciaFrJavontae Hopkins headshotJavontaeHopkinsSo
CBCadariusBaggettSo
CGCalebGoldenFr
HNHeriNgalamulumeJr
M. GipsonJr5'11"+1.287––61.3%8120.6%6815.33.83.052.4%86.5%
T. SmallJr6'5"-0.145––73.7%9419.5%619.25.81.640.0%81.8%
K. DotsenkoSo6'7"-0.430––61.2%8121.4%7310.62.71.237.7%82.4%
S. BoguesFr6'4"-0.526––50.9%3916.9%426.93.32.129.0%50.0%
F. HicksFr6'6"-0.815––47.5%2722.4%788.25.41.032.0%69.6%
S. DanielJr6'6"-0.913––52.2%4414.0%247.03.22.731.3%77.8%
J. Jackson Jr.Sr6'6"-1.35––47.5%2726.2%919.31.81.927.8%73.8%
C. StarksJr6'3"–––117.7%9912.5%163.31.10.70.0%85.7%
J. MadimbaFr6'5"–––123.2%9933.0%983.10.90.30.0%100.0%
S. SparksFr6'2"––––16.0%363.31.30.30.0%0.0%
R. GarciaFr5'10"––––0.0%20.00.00.50.0%0.0%
J. HopkinsSo6'0"–––62.9%8520.6%682.30.80.442.9%55.6%
C. BaggettSo6'1"––––9.6%82.70.90.90.0%0.0%
C. GoldenFr6'4"–––56.9%6620.3%674.61.91.30.0%100.0%
H. NgalamulumeJr6'9"––––7.0%54.22.50.50.0%50.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo25-2614-18#233-7.328102.818110.050-3.738-4827-88432.0%59-1019349.0%1532.2%2274.5%74
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo24-2512-20#321-13.51193.31106.858-2.553-4325-101230.8%54+282747.3%832.4%2573.3%64
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo23-2425-10#1331.559108.261106.751-2.845-2634-322731.0%68-1069250.3%3932.6%2875.7%89
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo22-2317-17#1770.254103.739103.565-0.164-5426-101328.2%40-1939949.7%3234.2%5270.4%36
Tarleton St. logoTarleton St. logo21-2214-17#211-5.43298.519104.052-2.945-11811-59828.1%48-1279746.5%930.5%1075.4%86

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.1%#175
Effective FG %
48.6%#233
3-Point %
37.4%#24
3PAR
28.7%#328
FTAR
38.1%#29
Assist %
51.5%#183

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
25.0%#338
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
31.8%#265
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

1 game

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 38.6% of shots at 1.12 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9738.6%1.12Middle (11–20s): 31.8% of shots at 1.43 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0631.8%1.43Late (21s+): 29.5% of shots at 0.85 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0029.5%0.85SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot1.1496D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s1.129138.6% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.439931.8% of shots
Late 21s+0.851129.5% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 51.1% of shots at 0.83 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9751.1%0.83Middle (11–20s): 31.9% of shots at 1.00 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0631.9%1.00Late (21s+): 17.0% of shots at 0.63 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0017.0%0.63SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot0.85100Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.838351.1% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.007231.9% of shots
Late 21s+0.6310017.0% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 334 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 20-21. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 20-21. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.