Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Big 12
TCU logo

TCU

16-16NET#99Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #45Coach: Jamie Dixon
Scheduleswipe to scroll · tap a game
WSTWLouisiana logoWAir Force logoWUC Irvine logoLClemson logoWWyoming logoWIllinois St. logoLUSC logoWWinthrop logoWLamar logoLXavier logoWGeorge Mason logoWIowa St. logoWKansas St. logoWOklahoma St. logoLWest Virginia logoLOklahoma logoWTexas Tech logoLArkansas logoLTexas logoLBaylor logoLOklahoma St. logoLKansas logoLTexas Tech logoWKansas St. logoLTexas logoWWest Virginia logoLIowa St. logoWBaylor logoLKansas logoLOklahoma logoLKansas St. logo

Team Stats

32 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating0.742
  • Offensive Rating100.112
  • Defensive Rating99.580
  • Pace65.348
  • Effective FG%49.8%49
  • Off Rebound Pct32.2%87
  • Turnover Pct21.8%24
  • FT Attempt Rate26.5%11

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct50.0%43
  • Point Margin / Game0.441
  • Points / Game65.411
  • Points Allowed / Game65.085
  • 1st Half Margin0.039
  • 2nd Half Margin0.444
  • Avg Largest Lead11.347
  • Avg Largest Deficit11.335

Box Score

  • Points / Game65.411
  • Rebounds / Game34.945
  • Assists / Game14.786
  • ORebs / Game11.279
  • DRebs / Game23.715
  • Steals / Game6.968
  • Blocks / Game4.994
  • Turnovers / Game14.222
  • PFs / Game16.474

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game23.718
  • FGAs / Game56.231
  • Field Goal Pct42.2%27
  • 2PMs / Game15.17
  • 2PAs / Game31.810
  • 2-Point Pct47.5%22
  • 3PMs / Game8.686
  • 3PAs / Game24.377
  • 3-Point Pct35.2%78
  • FTMs / Game9.52
  • FTAs / Game14.98
  • Free Throw Pct63.7%4

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s46.2%13
  • % Pts from 3s39.3%95
  • % Pts from FTs14.5%4
  • Paint Pts / Game17.231
  • % Pts in Paint26.3%39
  • Fast Break Pts / Game6.255
  • % Pts on Fast Break9.4%62
  • Points off TOVs / Game11.132
  • % Pts off TOVs17.0%47
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.222
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game33.46

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %52.1%25
  • Points / Shot1.1614
  • 3-Point Att Rate43.3%87
  • Assist Pct61.9%98
  • Assists / 100 Poss22.478
  • Ast/Tov Ratio1.03x59
  • PF Drawn / Game15.610

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%49.3%54
  • Opp True Shooting %52.5%65
  • Opp Field Goal Pct43.5%46
  • Opp 2-Point Pct47.6%73
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.1%21
  • Opp 3PA Rate33.1%85
  • Opp FT Att Rate30.8%60
  • Opp Points / Shot1.1967

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game65.085
  • Paint Pts Allowed15.178
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed4.968
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed9.283
  • Opp Assist Pct62.2%2
  • TOVs Forced / Game13.971

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct70.4%27
  • Turnovers Forced Pct21.3%69
  • Steal Pct10.5%65
  • Block Pct7.5%94
  • Hakeem Pct18.0%87
  • PF Efficiency1.09x33
  • Steals / PF0.42x78
  • Blocks / PF0.30x96

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split — a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction — tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares — where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where they rank bestof 353 D-I teams
  • #9AST%61.9%
  • #31SOS8.6
  • #423PM Diff+66
  • #51OREB%32.2%
  • #59Opp TOV%21.5%
  • #76FB Pts %14.9%
  • #793P%35.2%
  • #82Adj DRtg98.1
Where they rank worstof 353 D-I teams
  • #327TOV%21.8%
  • #315FTAR26.5%
  • #302Opp 3P%35.3%
  • #272Opp OREB%29.8%
  • #257TS%51.7%
  • #208Pts Diff+14
  • #188Paint Pts %39.2%
  • #182Opp eFG%49.3%
Game Log
Loading game log…
D. BaneSr6'6"+2.59957.8%7123.5%8316.66.33.943.9%78.6%
K. SamuelSo6'11"+1.89462.4%8517.7%4810.08.40.50.0%37.9%
J. GrayerSr6'5"+0.97155.3%6016.2%377.54.50.535.5%59.0%
F. FarabelloFr6'2"+0.86756.0%6312.5%153.71.42.242.4%84.6%
RJ NembhardSo6'5"+0.45247.9%2524.5%8712.13.83.531.7%73.3%
E. Dennis Jr.Sr6'3"-0.12444.8%1721.8%756.21.62.334.2%61.1%
PJ FullerFr6'4"-0.41446.0%1921.4%735.71.81.527.3%81.8%
O. AschierisJr6'1"66.7%915.8%30.30.20.150.0%0.0%
R. BarlowSo6'10"1.1%20.00.20.20.0%0.0%
J. LeDeeSo6'9"61.7%8313.6%202.72.90.10.0%70.6%
D. ArnetteFr6'3"0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
D. SmithFr6'7"32.4%619.0%572.51.90.618.3%51.9%
A. LucentiFr6'3"20.0%650.00.00.00.0%0.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
TCU logo25-26923-12#4515.388115.779100.59210.187+796604534.0%79-1059250.4%3033.2%3770.4%29
TCU logo24-2516-16#887.876108.355100.58811.993+844-521032.5%70-407246.1%429.2%264.9%2
TCU logo23-24921-13#3715.190115.08999.9887.681+1608904535.9%95-638251.5%5635.4%7173.1%67
TCU logo22-23622-13#2316.194112.28596.1948.692+3352-232732.2%80-1239550.0%3631.0%869.9%31
TCU logo21-22921-13#3014.991109.58194.69411.398+28899-213137.9%100+641448.7%2630.2%767.4%13
TCU logo19-2016-16#996.872104.96498.1778.692+3959+668832.2%85+44349.8%4735.2%7863.7%4
TCU logo18-1923-14#4813.387110.58297.2899.892+8670+397231.1%74+154152.1%6434.6%5368.2%24
TCU logo17-18621-12#2317.294119.297102.17510.597+19994+125734.2%91+93856.6%9539.5%9470.6%39
TCU logo16-1724-15#3215.491113.48998.18510.594+14582+75434.3%89-44952.7%7435.4%5668.6%34
TCU logo15-1612-21#1531.357100.73099.5809.093-9123-382529.3%45-105345.7%833.5%3267.1%20
TCU logo14-1518-15#5211.885107.77995.9875.179+8775+105837.5%95-367247.9%3232.7%3061.5%1
TCU logo13-148-22#244-5.93099.318105.2547.787-2900-591124.4%3-246644.8%232.2%1973.2%84

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
51.7%#257
Effective FG %
49.8%#179
3-Point %
35.2%#75
3PAR
43.3%#46
FTAR
26.5%#315
Assist %
61.9%#9

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
29.0%#305
Rim FG %
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
26.7%#157
Mid-range FG %
Corner 3 share
Corner 3 FG %
Above-break 3 FG %

Shot clock

14 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 41.5% of shots at 0.80 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0941.5%0.80Middle (11–20s): 26.4% of shots at 1.29 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0426.4%1.29Late (21s+): 32.1% of shots at 1.06 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9732.1%1.06SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 44.9% of shots at 0.76 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0744.9%0.76Middle (11–20s): 30.8% of shots at 1.24 points per shot, against a D-I 1.0230.8%1.24Late (21s+): 24.3% of shots at 1.04 points per shot, against a D-I 0.9524.3%1.04SHAREPTS/SHOT

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock — on the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws.

Assist network

14 games
Created byFinished by
Desmond Bane → Kevin Samuel: 8 assisted baskets (8 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 0 from three)Desmond Bane → RJ Nembhard Jr.: 16 assisted baskets (5 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 10 from three)Desmond Bane → Jaire Grayer: 11 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 7 from three)Desmond Bane → Edric Dennis: 8 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 7 from three)Desmond Bane → Francisco Farabello: 7 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Desmond Bane → Diante Smith: 6 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 5 from three)Desmond Bane → PJ Fuller II: 6 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 2 from three)RJ Nembhard Jr. → Desmond Bane: 12 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 8 from three)RJ Nembhard Jr. → Kevin Samuel: 17 assisted baskets (14 at the rim · 3 mid-range · 0 from three)PJ Fuller II → Desmond Bane: 9 assisted baskets (1 at the rim · 4 mid-range · 4 from three)PJ Fuller II → Kevin Samuel: 7 assisted baskets (6 at the rim · 1 mid-range · 0 from three)Edric Dennis → Desmond Bane: 8 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 2 mid-range · 6 from three)Edric Dennis → RJ Nembhard Jr.: 6 assisted baskets (0 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 6 from three)Francisco Farabello → Desmond Bane: 6 assisted baskets (2 at the rim · 0 mid-range · 4 from three)Bane62 astNembhard Jr.29 astFuller II16 astDennis14 astFarabelloBane35 madeSamuel32 madeNembhard Jr.22 madeGrayer11 madeDennis8 madeFarabelloSmithFuller II
Bane is the least-assisted finisher — 63% of rim makes unassisted. Tap a band or a name for the detail; click to keep it. (14 biggest connections shown.)

No lineup data for 19-20. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 19-20. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.