Tennessee30-8

SECCoach: Rick Barnes

30-8NET#5

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zakai Zeigler	1,952	387	83.5%	−0.250	−0.748	−0.452	−3.418	−0.546	−2.482	+5.078	−0.352	−3.916	+2.184	+0.746
Chaz Lanier	1,874	465	80.1%	−8.522	−7.816	+0.746	−0.150	−5.410	+1.132	−8.612	+0.346	+2.676	−3.48	−3.870
Jordan Gainey	1,629	710	69.6%	+10.886	+15.8100	+5.024	+4.088	+5.190	−3.692	+10.794	−1.060	−2.726	−2.020	+8.112
Jahmai Mashack	1,617	722	69.1%	−5.930	−5.026	+0.944	−0.942	−5.410	+0.442	−2.936	+2.522	−4.016	+3.192	−6.282
Felix Okpara	1,510	829	64.6%	−8.422	−4.528	+3.928	+0.758	−6.18	+1.626	−7.414	+3.616	−0.050	−0.738	−5.378
Igor Milicic Jr.	1,482	857	63.4%	+2.260	+0.554	−1.758	+1.264	−0.844	+0.836	−5.720	+1.336	+4.490	−0.444	−6.682
Cade Phillips	847	1,492	36.2%	+8.380	+3.670	−4.876	+1.062	+8.298	+1.526	+4.676	−3.684	+0.860	−0.838	+2.534
Darlinstone Dubar	495	1,844	21.1%	−3.338	−2.836	+0.546	−4.612	+1.666	−3.894	−1.940	−1.768	−2.726	+1.270	+11.96
Bishop Boswell	168	2,171	7.2%	−7.424	−18.22	−10.792	−9.32	+4.888	+8.00	+18.8100	−5.392	+6.896	−0.936	−5.880

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zakai Zeigler	1,952	387	83.5%	18.378	115.164	96.874	51.8%52	36.7%72	16.0%54	36.3%66	44.7%76	68.6%48	18.0%56	28.5%52
Chaz Lanier	1,874	465	80.1%	16.774	113.760	97.074	52.3%54	35.7%68	16.6%50	33.7%60	44.8%76	69.8%54	17.0%48	27.6%54
Jordan Gainey	1,629	710	69.6%	21.782	120.076	98.470	53.6%60	38.4%76	15.3%60	38.7%72	44.4%76	68.4%48	17.1%50	30.8%44
Jahmai Mashack	1,617	722	69.1%	16.674	113.760	97.174	52.1%54	35.2%68	16.5%50	34.5%62	45.5%72	68.0%46	18.6%60	26.5%58
Felix Okpara	1,510	829	64.6%	15.472	113.660	98.370	52.6%56	34.6%64	17.0%46	32.8%58	46.0%70	69.2%52	17.4%52	26.5%58
Igor Milicic Jr.	1,482	857	63.4%	19.278	115.464	96.274	52.8%56	36.5%72	16.7%48	33.4%60	45.2%74	70.9%60	17.5%54	25.9%60
Cade Phillips	847	1,492	36.2%	23.784	117.570	93.878	53.0%58	42.0%86	17.4%44	38.3%70	42.4%84	69.7%54	17.2%50	29.9%48
Darlinstone Dubar	495	1,844	21.1%	15.874	113.060	97.272	48.8%38	38.0%76	13.3%74	34.0%60	43.4%80	67.1%42	18.6%60	37.8%28
Bishop Boswell	168	2,171	7.2%	11.566	98.426	86.988	43.7%18	41.2%86	23.8%10	53.0%90	39.8%88	75.5%78	16.8%48	23.0%70

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Zakai Zeigler	1,952	387	83.5%	18.678	115.866	97.272	55.2%68	37.2%74	18.3%36	31.3%54	45.0%74	72.5%66	15.9%40	27.8%54
Chaz Lanier	1,874	465	80.1%	25.284	121.578	96.374	52.4%54	41.1%84	15.5%58	42.3%78	44.5%76	67.2%42	20.3%72	31.4%44
Jordan Gainey	1,629	710	69.6%	10.966	104.238	93.380	49.6%40	33.3%62	18.9%34	27.9%44	45.4%72	71.1%60	19.0%64	22.7%70
Jahmai Mashack	1,617	722	69.1%	22.582	118.772	96.274	53.0%58	40.6%84	16.1%54	37.4%68	43.0%82	72.0%64	15.5%38	32.7%40
Felix Okpara	1,510	829	64.6%	23.884	118.272	94.378	51.9%52	40.6%84	15.3%60	40.2%74	42.4%84	69.2%52	18.1%58	31.8%42
Igor Milicic Jr.	1,482	857	63.4%	17.076	114.964	97.972	51.6%50	37.3%74	15.9%56	39.1%72	43.9%78	66.5%38	17.9%56	32.5%40
Cade Phillips	847	1,492	36.2%	15.372	113.962	98.670	52.0%52	33.8%62	15.8%56	33.8%60	46.1%70	69.0%50	17.9%56	27.4%56
Darlinstone Dubar	495	1,844	21.1%	19.178	115.866	96.774	53.4%60	36.4%72	17.2%46	35.9%66	45.1%74	69.8%54	17.4%52	25.9%60
Bishop Boswell	168	2,171	7.2%	18.978	116.568	97.672	53.0%58	36.4%72	15.8%56	34.2%62	45.1%74	68.7%48	17.7%54	28.8%52

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.