Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Texas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logoTexas A&M Corpus Chris logo

Texas A&M Corpus Chris14-15

SouthlandCoach: Jim Shaw

14-15NET#181

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Sheldon Williams+19.298+18.2100−1.056+7.798+1.162−5.096+1.358−2.574+5.092−2.910+3.630
Nick Shogbonyo+8.982+7.688−1.356+7.598−2.528+1.722+2.766−4.488+1.464−4.74+2.634
Mason Gibson+4.770+3.470−1.256−0.742+3.984−1.066+11.196+2.326+3.382+3.494+2.734
Leo Torbor−2.042−7.816−5.880−3.320−2.330−0.862−5.722−0.252−3.320+2.486−9.792
D'Avian Houston+1.356+0.354−1.056+1.364+0.152+2.020+4.174−3.280+2.172−1.624+3.530
Franck Yetna−3.936+3.168+7.014+2.778−2.924−0.760−5.920+6.14−1.336+0.968−12.596
Cenker Evran+9.886+1.660−8.288−2.228+6.194−0.354−7.614−6.394−0.248−1.724−5.176
Daniel Michelini-Jackson+4.970+6.784+1.838+3.886+5.190+2.118−6.120−0.252−1.336−2.218−7.084
Kam Parker−13.710−7.616+6.116−4.514+0.758+0.244−7.116+5.86+2.474+0.866−0.754
Bryson Wheatfall−4.036−4.526−0.552−6.46−6.48−5.098+3.772−3.482−4.414+1.272+18.90
Kobi Pearson−7.126−10.510−3.468−1.832−3.422+4.92+9.292−0.454−7.44+5.7100+8.112
Jaden Haire−24.12−20.82+3.330−9.32−2.034+3.18+3.572+5.36+6.196−0.836+2.932

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Sheldon Williams7.558109.948102.46252.6%5232.1%6017.5%3640.5%6649.5%5873.1%6418.5%6845.8%18
Nick Shogbonyo4.354106.540102.26253.0%5230.8%5219.8%2241.1%6848.7%6071.9%5817.8%6245.5%20
Mason Gibson3.352105.436102.16449.7%3633.7%6618.7%2845.7%7651.5%4873.3%6421.3%8246.0%18
Leo Torbor-0.24699.62699.86848.3%3230.6%5218.8%2837.2%6050.2%5269.8%4820.7%8039.7%30
D'Avian Houston1.748103.834102.16450.8%4231.8%5820.3%2042.4%7048.5%6272.6%6218.6%6846.5%18
Franck Yetna-1.242105.336106.65251.5%4630.1%5218.8%2836.9%6053.6%3870.7%5220.0%7637.7%34
Cenker Evran6.356104.53698.27248.8%3435.1%7019.0%2636.0%5846.9%6871.4%5618.6%6841.8%26
Daniel Michelini-Jackson4.052107.942103.95852.4%5035.1%7020.5%1836.3%5850.2%5270.7%5218.2%6440.3%28
Kam Parker-8.63298.422107.05047.0%2632.2%6019.4%2435.2%5454.4%3473.1%6420.1%7644.1%22
Bryson Wheatfall-2.242100.126102.36245.1%2026.9%3815.3%5443.0%7247.7%6668.1%4020.4%7859.1%6
Kobi Pearson-4.63895.418100.06848.6%3429.1%4623.1%847.5%8050.0%5865.5%3024.0%9051.1%14
Jaden Haire-18.71886.78105.45442.4%1430.2%5221.7%1443.0%7254.7%3476.5%7618.9%7046.9%18

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Sheldon Williams-11.72691.714103.36044.9%2031.1%5422.5%1039.2%6451.9%4668.1%4021.4%8242.2%26
Nick Shogbonyo-4.63898.924103.56045.5%2233.2%6218.2%3238.5%6253.1%4070.6%5222.4%8642.9%24
Mason Gibson-1.342102.030103.36050.4%4229.8%5019.7%2234.6%5449.3%5869.9%4817.9%6243.3%22
Leo Torbor1.848107.442105.65451.7%4632.9%6219.6%2242.9%7250.4%5273.1%6418.3%6649.4%14
D'Avian Houston0.446103.532103.16049.5%3631.7%5818.3%3038.3%6251.7%4670.5%5220.2%7843.0%24
Franck Yetna2.750102.33099.66848.8%3433.1%6219.5%2442.8%7047.5%6672.0%5819.1%7250.3%14
Cenker Evran-3.440102.932106.45251.1%4428.9%4619.3%2443.7%7253.2%4071.5%5820.3%7846.9%18
Daniel Michelini-Jackson-0.944101.128102.06448.6%3429.9%5018.4%3042.4%7050.4%5271.9%5820.3%7847.2%18
Kam Parker5.154105.938100.86651.4%4631.6%5619.1%2642.3%7048.6%6270.8%5219.3%7244.7%20
Bryson Wheatfall1.848104.736102.86251.5%4633.3%6620.3%1839.2%6451.1%5072.5%6219.2%7240.2%28
Kobi Pearson2.450105.938103.46050.4%4232.4%6018.2%3238.3%6250.4%5272.9%6218.3%6642.9%24
Jaden Haire5.454107.542102.16451.7%4832.2%6018.6%2839.5%6449.4%5870.4%5219.7%7444.0%22
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.