Tulsa20-12

AmericanCoach: Frank Haith

20-12NET#66

Schedule

Team Stats

32 games

Net Rating5.873
Offensive Rating106.733
Defensive Rating100.985
Pace69.077
Effective FG%50.3%58
Off Rebound Pct27.9%32
Turnover Pct15.7%95
FT Attempt Rate39.6%72

Team Stats

32 games

ViewSplit

Core Stats

Net Rating5.873
Offensive Rating106.733
Defensive Rating100.985
Pace69.077
Effective FG%50.3%58
Off Rebound Pct27.9%32
Turnover Pct15.7%95
FT Attempt Rate39.6%72

Results & Margin

Win Pct62.5%75
Point Margin / Game4.074
Points / Game73.658
Points Allowed / Game69.671
1st Half Margin1.263
2nd Half Margin2.882
Avg Largest Lead12.068
Avg Largest Deficit8.868

Box Score

Points / Game73.658
Rebounds / Game35.141
Assists / Game13.661
ORebs / Game10.138
DRebs / Game25.052
Steals / Game6.879
Blocks / Game2.832
Turnovers / Game10.892
PFs / Game17.685

Shooting

FGMs / Game25.759
FGAs / Game57.854
Field Goal Pct44.4%61
2PMs / Game18.865
2PAs / Game36.846
2-Point Pct51.1%79
3PMs / Game6.844
3PAs / Game21.058
3-Point Pct32.6%25
FTMs / Game15.565
FTAs / Game22.976
Free Throw Pct67.6%25

Scoring Breakdown

% Pts from 2s51.1%60
% Pts from 3s27.9%39
% Pts from FTs21.0%59
Paint Pts / Game18.838
% Pts in Paint25.5%35
Fast Break Pts / Game4.570
% Pts on Fast Break6.1%67
Points off TOVs / Game9.839
% Pts off TOVs13.4%36
1st Half Pts / Game33.650
2nd Half Pts / Game39.571

Adv Offense

True Shooting %54.3%56
Points / Shot1.2762
3-Point Att Rate36.3%57
Assist Pct53.0%57
Assists / 100 Poss19.744
Ast/Tov Ratio1.26x83
PF Drawn / Game20.372

Opponent Shooting

Opp Effective FG%48.2%75
Opp True Shooting %53.1%67
Opp Field Goal Pct41.6%82
Opp 2-Point Pct45.0%88
Opp 3-Point Pct35.9%30
Opp 3PA Rate36.9%32
Opp FT Att Rate34.6%66
Opp Points / Shot1.2270

Defense Allowed

Points Allowed / Game69.671
Paint Pts Allowed13.674
Fast Break Pts Allowed1.881
Pts off TOVs Allowed5.384
Opp Assist Pct50.9%61
TOVs Forced / Game14.184

Adv Defense

Def Rebound Pct69.5%39
Turnovers Forced Pct20.5%70
Steal Pct9.8%66
Block Pct4.0%23
Hakeem Pct13.8%39
PF Efficiency0.87x92
Steals / PF0.38x88
Blocks / PF0.16x44

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 251 D-I teams

#17FB Pts %12.0%
#27TOV%15.7%
#37Paint Pts %44.5%
#47Opp TOV%20.5%
#72SOS6.2
#78Adj DRtg99.2
#82Adj ORtg109.3
#88Opp eFG%48.2%

Where they rank bestof 251 D-I teams

#17FB Pts %12.0%
#27TOV%15.7%
#37Paint Pts %44.5%
#47Opp TOV%20.5%
#72SOS6.2
#78Adj DRtg99.2
#82Adj ORtg109.3
#88Opp eFG%48.2%

Where they rank worstof 251 D-I teams

#2613P%32.6%
#244Opp 3P%35.9%
#241REB Diff-63
#236OREB%27.9%
#2333PM Diff-22
#212Opp OREB%30.5%
#157TS%53.6%
#152AST%53.0%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2015-16

Find Similar

1Temple 2018-1923-10AmericanMost alike in Opp OREB%, TOV%, OREB%91
2Providence 2015-1624-11Big EastMost alike in Opp TOV%, Opp OREB%, Tempo90
3Nebraska 2024-2520-15Big 10Most alike in Adj O, eFG%, Tempo87
4Pittsburgh 2024-2517-15ACCMost alike in TOV%, Adj D, Opp OREB%87
5South Florida 2023-2425-8AmericanMost alike in Tempo, Adj O, Adj D86
6Penn St. 2023-2416-17Big 10Most alike in Adj D, OREB%, FT rate86
7Louisiana Tech 2021-2221-10C-USAMost alike in Opp eFG%, OREB%, Adj D86
8Bradley 2025-2620-13MVCMost alike in 3PA rate, Opp TOV%, Tempo85
9Long Beach St. 2015-1618-15Big WestMost alike in Opp OREB%, OREB%, eFG%85
10Dayton 2016-1723-8A10Most alike in Opp TOV%, Tempo, 3PA rate84

Schedule

Loading the schedule

SHShaquilleHarrisonSr RRRashadRaySr JWJamesWoodardSr

RashadSmithSr MCMarquelCurtisSr BSBrandonSwanneganSr PBPatBirtJr DWD'AndreWrightSr

NWNickWoodSr

EEEmmanuelEzechinonsoSr

KajonBrownFr

SterlingTaplinFr


S. HarrisonShaquille Harrison	Sr	6'3"	+1.492	–	–	53.0%55	26.4%93	15.1	5.5	4.1	19.5%	63.2%
R. RayRashad Ray	Sr	5'11"	+1.188	–	–	45.8%26	15.1%28	4.1	1.4	1.9	30.8%	63.0%
J. WoodardJames Woodard	Sr	6'3"	+1.086	–	–	58.1%79	21.7%74	15.4	5.3	2.4	35.8%	78.6%
R. SmithRashad Smith	Sr	6'7"	+0.778	–	–	54.9%64	19.6%60	7.0	4.0	1.1	29.4%	55.1%
M. CurtisMarquel Curtis	Sr	6'3"	+0.778	–	–	52.1%50	16.9%41	6.6	4.2	2.2	28.8%	67.1%
B. SwanneganBrandon Swannegan	Sr	6'9"	+0.677	–	–	60.5%87	16.6%38	6.6	3.9	0.3	0.0%	60.7%
P. BirtPat Birt	Jr	6'5"	+0.364	–	–	53.2%56	21.0%70	12.0	3.3	0.8	36.6%	73.9%
D. WrightD'Andre Wright	Sr	6'9"	-0.533	–	–	53.8%59	17.2%43	5.2	3.3	0.3	0.0%	69.8%
N. WoodNick Wood	Sr	6'1"	–	–	–	50.0%40	22.6%79	0.7	0.2	0.0	0.0%	0.0%
E. EzechinonsoEmmanuel Ezechinonso	Sr	6'11"	–	–	–	0.0%2	1.8%2	0.0	0.6	0.0	0.0%	0.0%
K. BrownKajon Brown	Fr	6'4"	–	–	–	0.0%2	4.7%2	0.0	0.1	0.3	0.0%	0.0%
S. TaplinSterling Taplin	Fr	6'1"	–	–	–	53.4%57	15.2%28	2.6	1.1	0.7	27.3%	78.6%

						Ratings (ADJUSTED)				Four Factors				Shooting
			Conf	Coach
25-26	30-8	13-5	Amer	Eric Konkol	#50	14.086	121.391	107.368	0.767	+20892	+9793	34.1%79	+447	55.5%91	38.0%95	78.1%96
24-25	13-20	6-12	Amer	Eric Konkol	#274	-8.923	101.920	110.834	-3.543	-4226	+3472	27.3%25	+4621	50.3%35	32.2%23	66.7%9
23-24	16-15	7-11	Amer	Eric Konkol	#194	-2.645	103.133	105.858	-2.250	-8417	+651	24.8%14	+144	50.6%43	32.7%30	73.6%73
22-23	5-25	1-17	Amer	Eric Konkol	#331	-13.98	99.115	113.09	3.374	-2021	+448	24.8%15	+4218	47.9%14	31.3%10	64.6%4
21-22	11-20	4-14	Amer	Frank Haith	#180	-1.248	104.653	105.839	3.471	-6821	-706	26.7%32	-2361	49.6%38	34.2%56	72.6%59
19-20	21-10	13-5	Amer	Frank Haith	#89	7.775	101.946	94.292	2.871	+649	-5713	26.3%32	-3873	49.5%44	32.2%32	70.8%48
18-19	18-14	8-10	Amer	Frank Haith	#135	3.861	105.453	101.670	4.276	-6624	-5712	23.2%7	+943	51.2%55	34.0%41	69.5%40
17-18	19-12	12-6	Amer	Frank Haith	#110	4.969	109.370	104.460	1.669	+9378	-3524	32.0%79	+1733	50.7%43	34.8%46	72.5%62
16-17	15-17	8-10	Amer	Frank Haith	#155	0.855	103.647	102.962	5.879	+5263	-2032	29.5%48	+729	48.9%27	34.3%40	72.9%74
15-1611	20-12	12-6	Amer	Frank Haith	#66	10.082	109.677	99.679	6.180	-6328	-2233	27.9%28	-10697	50.3%52	32.6%22	67.6%25
14-15	23-10	14-4	Amer	Frank Haith	#82	6.774	100.839	94.293	2.170	+6970	-5115	31.1%48	-5078	46.8%20	32.1%23	64.9%10
13-1413	21-13	13-3	CUSA	Danny Manning	#79	8.277	107.259	98.984	1.365	+1750	-2138	30.2%34	-8491	49.2%41	32.7%25	67.6%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I

True Shooting %

53.6%#156

Effective FG %

50.3%#147

3-Point %

32.6%#261

3PAR

36.3%#149

FTAR

39.6%#96

Assist %

53.0%#151

Shot Profile

vs D-I

Rim rateshare of shots at the rim

36.9%#132

Rim FG %–

Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot

24.5%#88

Mid-range FG %–

Corner 3 share–

Corner 3 FG %–

Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

21 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense

Pts/Shot0.9948D-I 0.99

Early 0–10s0.746248.5% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.284630.7% of shots

Late 21s+1.162520.8% of shots

Defense

Pts/Shot0.9578Allowed, D-I 1.00

Early 0–10s0.686750.0% of shots

Middle 11–20s1.333224.4% of shots

Late 21s+1.118625.6% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 344 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 15-16. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 15-16. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.