Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Tulsa logoTulsa logoTulsa logoTulsa logo

Tulsa15-17

AmericanCoach: Frank Haith

15-17NET#155
Schedule
LJacksonville St. logoJacksonville St. logoLWichita St. logoWichita St. logoWNew Orleans logoWOregon St. logoOregon St. logoWOral Roberts logoOral Roberts logoLLittle Rock logoLittle Rock logoWIllinois St. logoIllinois St. logoLOklahoma St. logoOklahoma St. logoWTexas St. logoWStephen F. Austin logoStephen F. Austin logoLSan Diego St. logoSan Diego St. logoLIllinois St. logoIllinois St. logoWConnecticut logoConnecticut logoLHouston logoHouston logoWMemphis logoMemphis logoWTemple logoTemple logoWTulane logoTulane logoWSouth Florida logoSouth Florida logoLEast Carolina logoEast Carolina logoWUCF logoUCF logoLCincinnati logoCincinnati logoLSMU logoSMU logoLMemphis logoMemphis logoLHouston logoHouston logoLUCF logoUCF logoLCincinnati logoCincinnati logoWSouth Florida logoSouth Florida logoWEast Carolina logoEast Carolina logoLSMU logoSMU logoLTulane logoTulane logoWTulane logoTulane logoLCincinnati logoCincinnati logo

Team Stats

32 games
  • Net Rating-4.236
  • Offensive Rating99.610
  • Defensive Rating103.872
  • Pace67.755
  • Effective FG%48.9%33
  • Off Rebound Pct29.5%52
  • Turnover Pct21.8%19
  • FT Attempt Rate42.8%95

Team Stats

32 games

Core Stats

  • Net Rating-4.236
  • Offensive Rating99.610
  • Defensive Rating103.872
  • Pace67.755
  • Effective FG%48.9%33
  • Off Rebound Pct29.5%52
  • Turnover Pct21.8%19
  • FT Attempt Rate42.8%95

Results & Margin

  • Win Pct46.9%45
  • Point Margin / Game-2.835
  • Points / Game67.418
  • Points Allowed / Game70.369
  • 1st Half Margin-2.529
  • 2nd Half Margin-0.349
  • Avg Largest Lead8.329
  • Avg Largest Deficit12.830

Box Score

  • Points / Game67.418
  • Rebounds / Game34.840
  • Assists / Game11.416
  • ORebs / Game9.735
  • DRebs / Game25.153
  • Steals / Game4.56
  • Blocks / Game2.521
  • Turnovers / Game14.810
  • PFs / Game18.169

Shooting

  • FGMs / Game21.94
  • FGAs / Game52.32
  • Field Goal Pct41.9%19
  • 2PMs / Game14.63
  • 2PAs / Game30.95
  • 2-Point Pct47.2%25
  • 3PMs / Game7.351
  • 3PAs / Game21.355
  • 3-Point Pct34.3%44
  • FTMs / Game16.382
  • FTAs / Game22.475
  • Free Throw Pct72.9%74

Scoring Breakdown

  • % Pts from 2s43.3%6
  • % Pts from 3s32.5%66
  • % Pts from FTs24.2%96
  • Paint Pts / Game12.014
  • % Pts in Paint17.8%17
  • Fast Break Pts / Game1.59
  • % Pts on Fast Break2.2%9
  • Points off TOVs / Game8.621
  • % Pts off TOVs12.7%26
  • 1st Half Pts / Game31.523
  • 2nd Half Pts / Game35.822

Adv Offense

  • True Shooting %54.3%48
  • Points / Shot1.2965
  • 3-Point Att Rate40.8%80
  • Assist Pct52.2%52
  • Assists / 100 Poss16.911
  • Ast/Tov Ratio0.77x9
  • PF Drawn / Game20.381

Opponent Shooting

  • Opp Effective FG%50.4%53
  • Opp True Shooting %54.2%55
  • Opp Field Goal Pct43.4%60
  • Opp 2-Point Pct48.2%64
  • Opp 3-Point Pct35.9%37
  • Opp 3PA Rate39.1%24
  • Opp FT Att Rate33.1%65
  • Opp Points / Shot1.2461

Defense Allowed

  • Points Allowed / Game70.369
  • Paint Pts Allowed12.483
  • Fast Break Pts Allowed2.477
  • Pts off TOVs Allowed9.371
  • Opp Assist Pct49.5%73
  • TOVs Forced / Game12.537

Adv Defense

  • Def Rebound Pct71.7%62
  • Turnovers Forced Pct18.5%34
  • Steal Pct6.7%5
  • Block Pct3.7%18
  • Hakeem Pct10.4%4
  • PF Efficiency0.89x89
  • Steals / PF0.25x10
  • Blocks / PF0.14x30

Chips are national percentiles within the selected split: a team’s away numbers are ranked against every other team’s away numbers, not against the full season. Gray chips mark stats with no good direction (tempo, shot diet and the scoring shares), where the rank says how unusual a team is, not how good.

Where They Rank

of 350 D-I teams
  • #18FTAR42.8%
  • #76SOS5.9
  • #105REB Diff+52
  • #130Adj DRtg102.4
  • #133Opp OREB%28.3%
  • #165Opp eFG%50.4%
  • #167OREB%29.5%
  • #169AST%52.2%
Where they rank bestof 350 D-I teams
  • #18FTAR42.8%
  • #76SOS5.9
  • #105REB Diff+52
  • #130Adj DRtg102.4
  • #133Opp OREB%28.3%
  • #165Opp eFG%50.4%
  • #167OREB%29.5%
  • #169AST%52.2%
Where they rank worstof 350 D-I teams
  • #329TOV%21.8%
  • #2393PM Diff-20
  • #234eFG%48.9%
  • #228Pts Diff-91
  • #218Opp 3P%35.9%
  • #1963P%34.3%
  • #187TS%53.6%
  • #180Opp TOV%18.5%

Most Similar Seasons

to 2016-17
Find Similar
  1. 1Cal Baptist logoCal Baptist logoCal Baptist 2021-2215-16WAC91
  2. 2Western Michigan logoWestern Michigan logoWestern Michigan 2013-1422-10MAC90
  3. 3Vanderbilt logoVanderbilt logoVanderbilt 2018-199-23SEC89
  4. 4Wright St. logoWright St. logoWright St. 2016-1718-12Horizon83
  5. 5Valparaiso logoValparaiso logoValparaiso 2013-1415-16Horizon83
  6. 6Stony Brook logoStony Brook logoStony Brook 2019-2019-13America East83
  7. 7Temple logoTemple logoTemple 2022-2316-16American83
  8. 8George Washington logoGeorge Washington logoGeorge Washington 2024-2520-13A1083
  9. 9George Mason logoGeorge Mason logoGeorge Mason 2022-2320-13A1081
  10. 10Chattanooga logoChattanooga logoChattanooga 2014-1520-10Southern81
Schedule
Loading the schedule
JEJuniorEtouJrSterling Taplin headshotSterlingTaplinSoMartins Igbanu headshotMartinsIgbanuFrCJCorey HendersonJr.JrPBPatBirtSrJWJaleelWheelerJr
CHCoreyHaithSr
TETarekeyiEdogiJrWMWillMagnayFr
GAGenoArtisonSo
Lawson Korita headshotLawsonKoritaFrTravis Atson headshotTravisAtsonFr
AFAlexForeeFr
JBJosephBattleFr
J. EtouJr6'8"+0.671––63.8%8822.1%7712.66.71.342.7%76.7%
S. TaplinSo6'1"+0.567––53.5%4720.9%709.23.23.840.3%84.5%
M. IgbanuFr6'8"-0.047––60.6%8023.5%836.34.00.355.6%58.9%
C. Henderson Jr.Jr6'4"-0.145––51.6%3820.8%698.71.11.233.8%82.8%
P. BirtSr6'5"-0.239––44.8%1718.2%518.82.61.531.1%74.3%
J. WheelerJr6'4"-0.338––55.4%5719.0%579.34.32.029.5%72.5%
C. HaithSr5'11"–––64.3%8914.1%230.60.30.242.9%0.0%
T. EdogiJr6'8"–––65.6%9118.8%554.23.70.30.0%71.2%
W. MagnayFr6'10"–––59.3%7616.4%383.93.00.20.0%57.1%
G. ArtisonSo6'9"–––41.6%1317.8%481.71.10.332.1%0.0%
L. KoritaFr6'5"–––40.5%1215.8%342.81.50.726.2%86.7%
T. AtsonFr6'5"–––49.7%3016.6%401.61.00.231.6%60.0%
A. ForeeFr6'5"––––0.0%10.00.00.00.0%0.0%
J. BattleFr6'3"–––40.9%1217.6%460.90.60.033.3%100.0%
Ratings (ADJUSTED)Four FactorsShooting
Tulsa logoTulsa logo25-2630-8#5014.086121.391107.3680.767+20892+979334.1%79+44755.5%9138.0%9578.1%96
Tulsa logoTulsa logo24-2513-20#274-8.923101.920110.834-3.543-4226+347227.3%25+462150.3%3532.2%2366.7%9
Tulsa logoTulsa logo23-2416-15#194-2.645103.133105.858-2.250-8417+65124.8%14+14450.6%4332.7%3073.6%73
Tulsa logoTulsa logo22-235-25#331-13.9899.115113.093.374-2021+44824.8%15+421847.9%1431.3%1064.6%4
Tulsa logoTulsa logo21-2211-20#180-1.248104.653105.8393.471-6821-70626.7%32-236149.6%3834.2%5672.6%59
Tulsa logoTulsa logo19-2021-10#897.775101.94694.2922.871+649-571326.3%32-387349.5%4432.2%3270.8%48
Tulsa logoTulsa logo18-1918-14#1353.861105.453101.6704.276-6624-571223.2%7+94351.2%5534.0%4169.5%40
Tulsa logoTulsa logo17-1819-12#1104.969109.370104.4601.669+9378-352432.0%79+173350.7%4334.8%4672.5%62
Tulsa logoTulsa logo16-1715-17#1550.855103.647102.9625.879+5263-203229.5%48+72948.9%2734.3%4072.9%74
Tulsa logoTulsa logo15-161120-12#6610.082109.67799.6796.180-6328-223327.9%28-1069750.3%5232.6%2267.6%25
Tulsa logoTulsa logo14-1523-10#826.774100.83994.2932.170+6970-511531.1%48-507846.8%2032.1%2364.9%10
Tulsa logoTulsa logo13-141321-13#798.277107.25998.9841.365+1750-213830.2%34-849149.2%4132.7%2567.6%27

Loading shot locations…

Shooting

vs D-I
True Shooting %
53.6%#186
Effective FG %
48.9%#233
3-Point %
34.3%#194
3PAR
40.8%#70
FTAR
42.8%#17
Assist %
52.2%#168

Shot Profile

vs D-I
Rim rateshare of shots at the rim
34.3%#204
Rim FG %–
Mid-range ratethe least efficient shot
25.4%#114
Mid-range FG %–
Corner 3 share–
Corner 3 FG %–
Above-break 3 FG %–

Shot Clock

17 games

A full turn is the thirty-second clock. How far a band reaches is how often the shot came from that stretch; the number under it is what those shots returned per attempt.

Offense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 43.9% of shots at 0.61 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7143.9%0.61Middle (11–20s): 33.2% of shots at 1.25 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3033.2%1.25Late (21s+): 22.9% of shots at 1.17 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2222.9%1.17SHAREPTS/SHOT
Offense
Pts/Shot0.9523D-I 1.00
Early 0–10s0.611243.9% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.253033.2% of shots
Late 21s+1.172822.9% of shots
Defense
0s10s20sEarly (0–10s): 48.3% of shots at 0.72 points per shot, against a D-I 0.7248.3%0.72Middle (11–20s): 26.1% of shots at 1.35 points per shot, against a D-I 1.3226.1%1.35Late (21s+): 25.6% of shots at 1.30 points per shot, against a D-I 1.2325.6%1.30SHAREPTS/SHOT
Defense
Pts/Shot1.0334Allowed, D-I 1.01
Early 0–10s0.725048.3% of shots
Middle 11–20s1.353226.1% of shots
Late 21s+1.302625.6% of shots

Fill is this team's shooting against the D-I average for that stretch of the clock. On the defensive dial, green means opponents shot worse. The dashed arc is where D-I's own share of shots sits on the same scale. Points per shot excludes free throws. Percentiles are against the 343 D-I teams with five games or more on the clock this season.

No lineup data for 16-17. Five-man units are reconstructed from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.

No on/off data for 16-17. It is built from the players on the floor at each play, which the play-by-play only began carrying in 2023-24.