UAB19-12

AmericanCoach: Andy Kennedy

19-12NET#115

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chance Westry	1,606	482	76.9%	+9.584	+8.188	−1.458	+3.786	+0.556	−2.384	+5.782	−2.272	+2.072	−3.48	+4.824
Evan Chatman	1,529	559	73.2%	−6.826	−11.38	−4.474	−6.36	−1.538	+0.836	+4.476	+1.038	+3.282	+2.688	−7.586
Daniel Rivera	1,488	599	71.3%	−11.114	−7.716	+3.530	−1.436	−2.926	+0.736	−13.54	+1.038	−4.514	−2.316	−11.794
Jacob Meyer	1,280	807	61.3%	−9.318	+0.554	+9.78	+2.576	+0.860	+2.118	−4.428	+3.316	−3.618	−1.428	+5.520
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	1,028	1,060	49.2%	+6.776	+12.898	+6.116	+4.088	+4.588	−1.978	+5.580	+0.940	−0.150	−1.428	+12.74
Ahmad Robinson	1,004	1,083	48.1%	+1.156	+1.962	+0.844	+0.252	+0.152	+1.328	+4.474	+0.544	−2.426	+1.474	+0.148
Salim London	989	1,099	47.4%	+1.658	−2.338	−3.970	−0.346	−0.744	−0.048	+2.164	−1.162	+1.466	+0.662	−7.084
Dayjaun Anderson	791	1,296	37.9%	+2.662	−2.536	−5.178	−2.228	−1.538	−2.180	−6.020	−2.474	+0.254	+0.560	−0.452
Quaran McPherson	463	1,625	22.2%	−0.250	+0.252	+0.348	+1.062	−2.528	+1.624	−1.742	+0.742	+2.272	−1.624	−6.280
Ari Gooch	215	1,872	10.3%	+5.472	−1.542	−6.984	−3.518	+6.494	−1.066	−1.940	+0.444	+5.494	+6.7100	+10.66

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chance Westry	1,606	482	76.9%	8.560	111.952	103.460	49.3%36	32.4%60	12.0%76	38.1%62	49.1%58	73.2%64	15.0%42	29.4%56
Evan Chatman	1,529	559	73.2%	4.554	107.040	102.562	46.7%26	32.0%58	12.8%72	38.0%62	49.9%58	73.7%66	16.4%52	26.2%66
Daniel Rivera	1,488	599	71.3%	3.152	107.842	104.756	48.1%30	31.5%56	12.8%72	33.1%50	49.9%58	71.5%58	15.1%42	25.2%68
Jacob Meyer	1,280	807	61.3%	2.750	110.248	107.550	49.4%36	32.6%60	13.4%68	35.1%54	50.9%50	71.4%56	15.2%44	30.4%54
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	1,028	1,060	49.2%	9.762	116.564	106.852	50.5%42	34.7%68	11.6%80	39.6%64	50.1%52	72.7%62	15.1%42	34.8%42
Ahmad Robinson	1,004	1,083	48.1%	6.958	111.050	104.158	48.5%34	32.4%60	13.2%68	39.1%64	49.9%58	71.5%58	16.5%52	28.3%60
Salim London	989	1,099	47.4%	7.158	108.846	101.764	48.3%32	31.9%58	12.5%74	37.9%62	49.0%60	73.5%66	16.1%50	24.6%70
Dayjaun Anderson	791	1,296	37.9%	7.960	108.544	100.566	47.1%28	31.4%56	11.3%82	33.2%50	48.1%64	72.9%62	16.1%50	28.0%60
Quaran McPherson	463	1,625	22.2%	6.256	110.248	104.058	49.3%36	30.4%52	13.8%66	35.5%56	50.1%52	74.5%68	14.5%38	23.4%74
Ari Gooch	215	1,872	10.3%	11.164	108.744	97.672	45.4%22	38.0%80	11.6%80	35.1%54	50.0%58	77.7%80	21.7%84	37.9%34

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Chance Westry	1,606	482	76.9%	-1.044	103.834	104.856	45.6%22	32.0%58	14.3%62	32.5%48	51.3%48	71.3%54	18.3%66	24.6%70
Evan Chatman	1,529	559	73.2%	11.364	118.370	107.050	53.1%54	33.5%66	12.0%76	33.6%52	48.9%60	70.5%52	13.9%34	33.7%44
Daniel Rivera	1,488	599	71.3%	14.370	115.562	101.266	49.4%36	34.4%68	12.0%76	46.5%78	48.8%60	76.1%74	17.4%60	36.8%36
Jacob Meyer	1,280	807	61.3%	12.066	109.748	97.872	46.9%26	31.9%58	11.3%82	39.5%64	47.6%66	74.9%70	16.6%54	24.9%70
KyeRon Lindsay-Martin	1,028	1,060	49.2%	3.050	103.734	100.766	46.4%24	30.2%52	13.5%68	34.1%52	49.2%58	72.8%62	16.4%52	22.2%78
Ahmad Robinson	1,004	1,083	48.1%	5.856	109.146	103.460	48.4%32	32.3%60	11.9%78	34.8%54	49.4%58	74.0%68	15.1%42	28.2%60
Salim London	989	1,099	47.4%	5.654	111.152	105.654	48.6%34	32.7%60	12.6%74	35.9%56	50.2%52	72.1%60	15.5%44	31.6%50
Dayjaun Anderson	791	1,296	37.9%	5.354	111.050	105.754	49.3%36	32.9%62	13.3%68	39.2%64	50.5%52	72.7%62	15.6%46	28.4%60
Quaran McPherson	463	1,625	22.2%	6.456	110.048	103.660	48.2%32	32.8%62	12.2%76	37.2%60	49.5%58	72.3%60	16.1%50	29.7%56
Ari Gooch	215	1,872	10.3%	5.756	110.248	104.556	48.8%34	31.6%58	12.7%72	37.0%60	49.6%58	72.3%60	15.0%42	27.3%64

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.