Big West

UC Irvine

32-7NET#65Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #94Coach: Russ Turner

On the court

Off the court

Combo size

Columns

	Workload		Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent
Lineup
Totals	2,607	1,219	13.9—	108.2—	94.3—	51.9%—	28.9%—	18.0%—	36.7%—	45.1%—	72.9%—	17.4%—	21.4%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenCheM. CheHohnJ. HohnDixonJ. Dixon	808	397	15.1—	112.3—	97.2—	52.3%—	29.9%—	16.2%—	42.8%—	45.4%—	73.3%—	14.7%—	19.0%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenCheM. CheHenryA. HenryHohnJ. Hohn	195	88	25.7—	113.1—	87.4—	54.5%—	26.8%—	17.5%—	39.0%—	42.0%—	75.9%—	18.5%—	17.2%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenHohnJ. HohnLeeT. LeeDixonJ. Dixon	97	47	10.9—	114.0—	103.1—	61.0%—	21.1%—	21.6%—	32.9%—	45.7%—	74.2%—	12.9%—	27.2%—
TillisD. TillisCheM. CheHohnJ. HohnEvansK. EvansDixonJ. Dixon	80	34	5.1—	98.9—	93.8—	48.4%—	22.9%—	20.0%—	37.7%—	41.8%—	60.9%—	19.3%—	29.9%—
EvansK. EvansLeeT. LeeRedfieldL. RedfieldDixonJ. DixonUjadugheleO. Ujadughele	71	31	48.8—	107.4—	58.7—	58.6%—	23.3%—	21.2%—	17.2%—	30.7%—	77.8%—	22.0%—	22.8%—
CheM. CheEvansK. EvansCan AkinB. Can AkinLeeT. LeeUjadugheleO. Ujadughele	65	28	29.6—	97.4—	67.8—	51.0%—	33.3%—	26.3%—	27.5%—	39.4%—	77.8%—	29.3%—	7.7%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenHenryA. HenryHohnJ. HohnRedfieldL. Redfield	48	23	37.9—	126.1—	88.1—	46.2%—	50.0%—	10.5%—	30.8%—	44.2%—	77.4%—	18.4%—	18.6%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenCheM. CheLeeT. LeeDixonJ. Dixon	46	22	-23.6—	94.2—	117.8—	41.9%—	34.8%—	21.9%—	37.8%—	48.8%—	57.1%—	14.7%—	23.8%—
LeuchtenB. LeuchtenCheM. CheHohnJ. HohnDixonJ. DixonUjadugheleO. Ujadughele	39	17	-4.9—	106.5—	111.4—	41.7%—	28.6%—	13.0%—	66.7%—	48.7%—	60.9%—	16.6%—	34.2%—
TillisD. TillisHohnJ. HohnEvansK. EvansLeeT. LeeDixonJ. Dixon	38	18	-5.2—	129.6—	134.8—	67.2%—	20.0%—	13.2%—	25.0%—	59.0%—	72.2%—	5.1%—	17.9%—
TillisD. TillisCheM. CheEvansK. EvansLeeT. LeeDixonJ. Dixon	38	20	33.4—	143.7—	110.3—	60.6%—	33.3%—	8.0%—	48.5%—	51.2%—	66.7%—	14.7%—	20.0%—
LeuchtenB. LeuchtenHohnJ. HohnLeeT. LeeDixonJ. DixonUjadugheleO. Ujadughele	35	14	25.7—	124.9—	99.2—	70.0%—	10.0%—	17.0%—	44.0%—	45.5%—	52.4%—	22.7%—	27.3%—
TillisD. TillisCheM. CheHenryA. HenryHohnJ. HohnEvansK. Evans	33	14	71.4—	149.6—	78.2—	71.2%—	41.7%—	12.0%—	9.1%—	35.0%—	81.0%—	6.8%—	10.0%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenHohnJ. HohnEgboB. EgboDixonJ. Dixon	31	15	20.9—	130.4—	109.6—	69.0%—	26.7%—	15.9%—	10.3%—	48.4%—	72.2%—	12.2%—	19.4%—
TillisD. TillisLeuchtenB. LeuchtenCheM. CheCan AkinB. Can AkinDixonJ. Dixon	31	14	112.0—	157.4—	45.4—	67.3%—	45.5%—	9.6%—	57.7%—	22.7%—	88.9%—	25.9%—	27.3%—
HohnJ. HohnEvansK. EvansLeeT. LeeDixonJ. DixonUjadugheleO. Ujadughele	31	13	-52.8—	87.7—	140.4—	37.5%—	25.0%—	13.0%—	28.6%—	73.1%—	66.7%—	19.2%—	26.9%—

Only combinations that played at least 30 possessions together are listed. Percentiles rank each row against every Division I five-man unit that cleared the same floor in 2024-25. +/-, GP, POSS, MINS and Pace are unranked: they scale with playing time, so a combination and a single lineup are not comparable on them.