UC Irvine31-7

Big WestCoach: Russ Turner

31-7NET#63

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,866	668	73.6%	−2.142	+7.084	+9.110	+3.988	+1.968	+0.148	+0.958	+2.226	−0.348	−4.16	+0.050
Devin Tillis	1,825	708	72.0%	+8.582	+13.598	+5.024	+4.390	+3.884	−1.876	+4.878	+0.544	+2.070	−4.16	−1.960
Myles Che	1,776	758	70.1%	+2.560	−3.432	−6.080	−5.98	+1.364	−2.078	+5.682	−2.676	+2.374	−0.248	−2.564
Bent Leuchten	1,703	831	67.2%	+7.378	+7.084	−0.350	+1.970	+1.666	−0.658	+10.994	−1.162	+3.080	−3.38	−4.674
Jurian Dixon	1,664	870	65.7%	+4.568	+15.1100	+10.66	+5.194	+0.858	−4.796	+9.292	+2.722	−6.18	−2.912	+1.938
Torian Lee	938	1,596	37.0%	−6.926	−5.424	+1.540	+1.770	−5.510	+2.020	−8.512	+1.038	−2.824	+2.284	+2.038
Kyle Evans	730	1,804	28.8%	−6.926	−6.718	+0.148	−1.634	−2.232	+1.132	−10.56	+2.424	−1.536	+3.594	+1.242
Ofure Ujadughele	674	1,860	26.6%	−8.222	−10.310	−2.162	−2.328	−4.814	+1.724	−5.322	+2.028	−0.942	+4.798	+4.922
Berk Can Akin	453	2,081	17.9%	−5.332	−9.910	−4.674	−3.816	−1.736	+1.626	−1.742	+2.226	−1.832	+8.3100	+1.242
Andre Henry	347	2,187	13.7%	+11.990	−2.538	−14.496	−1.634	+3.482	+2.318	−5.224	−6.094	+8.8100	−0.936	−5.478
Ben Egbo	312	2,222	12.3%	−13.112	−9.412	+3.728	−4.214	−0.744	+1.230	−1.642	+1.730	+0.758	−0.838	+0.050
Langston Redfield	203	2,330	8.0%	+7.678	−8.514	−16.198	−1.732	+6.294	+6.50	−11.56	−6.496	+6.796	−1.034	−0.352
Elijah Chol	158	2,376	6.2%	+1.356	−7.916	−9.290	−4.412	−0.150	−2.584	−0.946	−9.898	−7.26	+0.356	+6.816

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,866	668	73.6%	12.668	110.052	97.472	52.9%58	29.5%44	18.2%38	36.4%68	45.9%72	72.9%68	16.0%42	21.5%74
Devin Tillis	1,825	708	72.0%	15.572	111.956	96.474	53.1%58	30.1%48	17.6%42	37.5%68	45.4%72	73.6%72	15.9%42	20.9%74
Myles Che	1,776	758	70.1%	14.070	107.144	93.180	50.1%46	29.4%44	17.6%42	37.8%70	44.5%76	73.7%72	17.1%50	20.7%76
Bent Leuchten	1,703	831	67.2%	15.672	110.452	94.976	52.5%56	29.5%44	18.0%40	39.8%74	44.9%74	74.0%74	16.0%42	20.0%78
Jurian Dixon	1,664	870	65.7%	14.772	113.360	98.670	53.6%60	29.3%44	16.5%50	39.3%72	46.2%70	70.9%60	16.1%42	22.1%72
Torian Lee	938	1,596	37.0%	8.962	104.738	95.976	53.0%58	25.5%28	19.4%30	30.8%52	45.9%72	71.2%60	18.5%60	22.7%70
Kyle Evans	730	1,804	28.8%	8.362	103.336	95.076	50.7%46	27.4%36	18.9%32	28.7%46	47.0%66	71.9%64	19.6%68	22.3%72
Ofure Ujadughele	674	1,860	26.6%	7.160	100.630	93.480	50.2%46	25.5%28	19.4%30	32.2%56	46.7%68	72.3%66	20.5%72	25.0%62
Berk Can Akin	453	2,081	17.9%	8.862	100.028	91.282	48.8%36	27.6%36	19.4%30	34.8%64	47.1%66	71.5%62	23.9%88	22.5%72
Andre Henry	347	2,187	13.7%	23.584	106.042	82.592	50.5%46	31.9%54	20.2%24	31.7%54	40.1%88	80.6%92	16.3%44	16.8%86
Ben Egbo	312	2,222	12.3%	1.750	99.928	98.270	48.2%34	28.4%40	19.2%30	34.8%64	46.8%68	73.6%72	16.4%44	21.5%74
Langston Redfield	203	2,330	8.0%	20.180	100.328	80.294	50.3%46	34.7%66	24.1%10	25.6%36	39.4%90	79.1%88	16.2%44	21.2%74
Elijah Chol	158	2,376	6.2%	14.470	100.730	86.488	47.8%32	28.9%42	15.8%56	35.3%64	36.1%94	66.4%38	17.4%52	27.8%54

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Justin Hohn	1,866	668	73.6%	14.772	103.034	88.386	49.0%38	27.6%38	18.1%38	35.5%64	43.7%80	73.2%70	20.1%70	21.5%74
Devin Tillis	1,825	708	72.0%	7.060	98.426	91.482	48.8%38	26.3%32	19.5%30	32.7%58	44.9%74	71.6%62	20.0%70	22.8%70
Myles Che	1,776	758	70.1%	11.566	110.552	99.170	56.0%70	28.0%38	19.5%28	32.2%56	47.1%66	71.4%60	17.2%50	23.2%68
Bent Leuchten	1,703	831	67.2%	8.362	103.436	95.176	50.6%46	27.9%38	18.5%36	28.9%46	46.0%70	71.0%60	19.3%66	24.5%64
Jurian Dixon	1,664	870	65.7%	10.264	98.224	88.086	48.5%36	28.5%40	21.3%20	30.1%50	43.5%80	77.0%84	19.0%64	20.2%76
Torian Lee	938	1,596	37.0%	15.874	110.152	94.478	51.3%48	31.0%50	17.4%44	39.2%72	44.9%74	74.1%74	16.3%44	20.7%76
Kyle Evans	730	1,804	28.8%	15.272	110.152	94.976	52.4%54	29.6%46	17.8%40	39.2%72	44.6%76	73.4%70	16.1%42	21.1%74
Ofure Ujadughele	674	1,860	26.6%	15.372	110.954	95.676	52.5%54	30.3%48	17.7%42	37.5%70	44.7%76	73.2%70	15.8%40	20.2%76
Berk Can Akin	453	2,081	17.9%	14.170	109.952	95.876	52.6%56	29.3%44	17.9%40	36.4%68	44.9%74	73.3%70	15.6%40	21.3%74
Andre Henry	347	2,187	13.7%	11.666	108.548	96.974	52.1%54	28.5%40	17.8%40	36.9%68	46.1%70	71.7%62	17.2%50	22.2%72
Ben Egbo	312	2,222	12.3%	14.872	109.350	94.578	52.4%54	29.1%44	18.0%40	36.3%66	45.1%74	72.9%68	17.2%50	21.5%74
Langston Redfield	203	2,330	8.0%	12.568	108.850	96.374	52.0%54	28.5%40	17.6%42	37.1%68	45.8%72	72.4%66	17.2%50	21.5%74
Elijah Chol	158	2,376	6.2%	13.168	108.648	95.576	52.2%54	29.0%42	18.3%38	36.2%66	45.9%70	73.6%72	17.1%50	21.0%74

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.