UCF17-16

Big 12Coach: Johnny Dawkins

17-16NET#66

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	1,633	382	81.0%	−6.228	+4.372	+10.58	+2.072	+0.858	−0.658	−7.914	+7.04	−0.646	+0.660	+1.142
Jaylin Sellers	1,621	395	80.4%	+3.766	+3.066	−0.752	+4.690	+2.170	+2.714	−2.638	−0.656	−1.438	+1.168	+2.236
Shemarri Allen	1,379	636	68.4%	+11.788	+3.166	−8.686	−1.536	+2.876	−1.266	+10.694	−0.454	+3.682	+2.888	−3.066
Ibrahima Diallo	901	1,115	44.7%	+7.176	+6.180	−0.954	+3.986	−0.448	−1.368	−0.450	+1.236	+2.070	−0.248	−10.792
Marchelus Avery	800	1,215	39.7%	−11.516	+2.362	+13.84	−1.238	+2.472	−0.556	+3.572	+4.212	−2.132	−2.022	+15.92
Omar Payne	754	1,261	37.4%	−8.722	−10.010	−1.356	−3.716	−0.350	+2.218	−11.66	+0.346	−1.736	+0.356	−9.790
Thierno Sylla	713	1,302	35.4%	+1.756	−2.338	−4.070	−0.842	+0.656	+1.034	−4.328	−1.968	+6.596	−1.134	+0.844
C.J. Walker	706	1,310	35.0%	−19.76	−18.72	+1.044	−8.82	−5.014	+1.330	+3.572	−0.354	+1.768	−2.912	−5.074
Antwann Jones	486	1,530	24.1%	+4.970	+10.994	+6.020	+1.870	+6.292	−2.278	+4.476	+1.038	−3.520	−1.922	−1.658
DeMarr Langford Jr.	412	1,604	20.4%	+9.682	+1.960	−7.784	+3.988	+3.882	+4.94	+0.656	+0.050	+1.970	+3.894	+0.048
Nils Machowski	364	1,651	18.1%	+18.696	+4.372	−14.396	+1.566	−5.114	−5.696	+0.554	−9.398	−2.330	+4.196	+8.312
Tyler Hendricks	150	1,866	7.4%	+7.276	+3.268	−4.070	+2.374	−4.218	−1.976	−1.644	−6.694	+2.272	−2.218	+18.80

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	1,633	382	81.0%	4.554	106.644	102.160	48.2%36	37.0%74	19.0%32	35.1%64	49.1%56	69.0%50	21.2%76	39.4%22
Jaylin Sellers	1,621	395	80.4%	6.558	106.444	100.066	48.8%38	37.3%76	19.7%28	36.1%66	47.6%64	68.8%50	21.3%78	39.6%22
Shemarri Allen	1,379	636	68.4%	9.462	106.844	97.472	47.4%34	37.7%78	18.8%34	40.0%74	47.6%64	70.2%56	21.9%80	38.2%24
Ibrahima Diallo	901	1,115	44.7%	9.664	109.250	99.668	50.0%42	36.6%72	18.4%36	36.4%66	48.3%60	70.2%56	21.0%76	33.4%34
Marchelus Avery	800	1,215	39.7%	-1.144	107.246	108.446	47.1%32	38.3%80	18.9%34	38.7%72	50.2%48	67.8%44	19.9%70	48.8%12
Omar Payne	754	1,261	37.4%	0.346	99.628	99.368	45.5%26	36.7%74	20.6%22	29.4%48	47.9%62	68.0%46	21.2%78	33.2%36
Thierno Sylla	713	1,302	35.4%	6.858	104.340	97.572	47.3%32	37.2%76	19.8%28	33.8%60	46.5%68	73.3%70	20.3%72	39.7%22
C.J. Walker	706	1,310	35.0%	-7.134	93.718	100.764	42.0%14	33.6%62	20.0%26	38.9%72	47.5%64	70.2%56	19.1%64	35.9%30
Antwann Jones	486	1,530	24.1%	9.564	114.162	104.654	49.2%40	41.5%86	17.5%42	39.9%74	48.4%58	66.4%38	19.6%68	38.0%24
DeMarr Langford Jr.	412	1,604	20.4%	13.470	107.346	93.978	51.0%50	39.9%82	23.1%12	37.1%68	47.7%62	70.6%58	24.2%88	39.2%22
Nils Machowski	364	1,651	18.1%	21.080	109.450	88.486	49.1%40	32.8%58	14.6%64	37.0%68	40.0%88	67.3%42	24.4%90	46.0%14
Tyler Hendricks	150	1,866	7.4%	12.468	108.850	96.374	50.0%42	33.0%58	17.4%44	35.1%64	41.6%84	71.1%60	19.0%64	56.6%6

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Johnson	1,633	382	81.0%	10.764	102.434	91.682	46.2%28	36.2%72	19.6%28	43.0%80	42.1%84	69.5%52	20.6%74	38.3%24
Jaylin Sellers	1,621	395	80.4%	2.852	103.436	100.664	44.2%22	35.2%68	17.0%46	38.6%70	48.2%60	70.2%56	20.2%72	37.4%26
Shemarri Allen	1,379	636	68.4%	-2.342	103.738	106.050	48.8%40	34.9%68	20.0%26	29.4%48	48.0%62	66.7%38	19.1%64	41.2%20
Ibrahima Diallo	901	1,115	44.7%	2.650	103.136	100.564	46.1%28	37.0%74	19.7%28	36.7%68	47.2%64	68.2%48	21.2%76	44.1%16
Marchelus Avery	800	1,215	39.7%	10.364	104.940	94.678	48.3%38	35.9%70	19.3%30	35.2%64	46.1%70	69.9%54	21.9%80	32.9%38
Omar Payne	754	1,261	37.4%	9.062	109.652	100.664	49.3%40	37.0%74	18.3%38	41.0%76	47.6%64	69.7%54	21.0%76	42.8%18
Thierno Sylla	713	1,302	35.4%	5.156	106.744	101.562	48.1%36	36.6%74	18.8%34	38.2%70	48.4%60	66.8%42	21.5%78	38.9%24
C.J. Walker	706	1,310	35.0%	12.668	112.458	99.866	50.8%48	38.6%80	18.7%34	35.4%64	47.8%62	68.5%48	22.1%82	40.9%20
Antwann Jones	486	1,530	24.1%	4.654	103.236	98.670	47.4%34	35.3%70	19.7%28	35.5%64	47.5%64	69.9%54	21.5%78	39.5%22
DeMarr Langford Jr.	412	1,604	20.4%	3.854	105.542	101.662	47.1%32	36.1%72	18.1%38	36.5%66	47.7%62	68.7%48	20.3%72	39.1%22
Nils Machowski	364	1,651	18.1%	2.450	105.140	102.760	47.6%34	37.9%78	20.2%24	36.5%66	49.3%54	69.5%52	20.3%72	37.7%26
Tyler Hendricks	150	1,866	7.4%	5.256	105.642	100.466	47.7%34	37.2%76	19.3%30	36.7%68	48.2%60	68.9%50	21.2%78	37.8%26

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.