UNC Wilmington18-10

CAACoach: Takayo Siddle

18-10NET#111

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trazarien White	1,245	403	75.5%	+5.772	+10.494	+4.726	+3.182	−2.430	−4.394	+11.796	+3.418	−0.546	+0.154	+0.546
Shykeim Phillips	1,119	529	67.9%	+18.696	+9.290	−9.488	+4.188	−2.232	−3.288	+9.492	−2.170	+4.990	+1.776	−1.256
KJ Jenkins	1,078	571	65.4%	−0.150	+7.986	+8.012	+1.970	+2.976	−1.672	+3.874	+2.326	−3.322	−3.310	−8.086
Donovan Newby	963	685	58.4%	+3.664	+1.458	−2.260	−1.832	+0.960	−0.454	+4.978	+0.444	+5.090	−0.346	+2.136
Maleeck Harden-Hayes	806	843	48.9%	−11.116	−3.036	+8.012	−2.526	−2.928	−0.150	+12.496	+3.914	−3.124	+0.762	+8.212
Khamari McGriff	684	964	41.5%	+6.976	−3.732	−10.692	+1.970	+0.758	+2.912	−10.68	−3.482	−1.934	+4.496	−7.584
Noah Ross	635	1,013	38.6%	+2.258	−2.240	−4.472	−1.138	+1.262	+0.048	−8.912	−4.888	+2.876	−3.510	−3.568
Nolan Hodge	608	1,040	36.9%	−7.724	−9.012	−1.356	−1.734	−1.044	+2.812	−8.114	−0.656	+0.556	+0.762	+3.232
Shemar Rathan-Mayes	356	1,292	21.6%	−8.522	−5.424	+3.232	−0.744	−0.746	+3.410	+1.360	−1.362	−5.110	+0.560	+8.710
Eric Van Der Heijden	283	1,366	17.1%	−4.734	+2.162	+6.816	+0.556	−0.844	−1.266	−4.924	+0.248	+0.252	−3.68	+0.644
Nick Farrar	248	1,400	15.1%	−24.14	−15.84	+8.312	−4.114	−8.74	−0.556	−8.912	+7.32	+2.070	−0.052	−2.864
Ahmard Harvey	209	1,439	12.7%	+12.588	+6.882	−5.778	−1.238	+14.9100	+1.724	−9.110	−3.178	−3.420	+2.484	+2.038

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trazarien White	1,245	403	75.5%	4.254	118.372	114.132	51.1%50	33.4%62	12.3%78	35.6%66	53.2%36	64.3%32	17.8%56	32.3%38
Shykeim Phillips	1,119	529	67.9%	8.862	118.774	109.942	51.7%54	33.3%58	12.3%78	35.8%66	51.7%44	66.1%36	18.3%60	31.8%40
KJ Jenkins	1,078	571	65.4%	2.752	118.572	115.828	51.0%50	35.0%68	12.8%76	34.0%62	53.2%36	63.3%26	16.6%48	29.5%48
Donovan Newby	963	685	58.4%	4.354	116.468	112.136	49.6%42	34.4%64	13.2%74	34.7%62	52.6%38	66.5%38	17.6%54	33.1%36
Maleeck Harden-Hayes	806	843	48.9%	-2.942	114.264	117.126	49.0%40	32.5%58	13.3%72	39.2%72	54.4%30	62.8%26	18.1%58	36.4%28
Khamari McGriff	684	964	41.5%	6.858	113.662	106.848	51.5%52	34.5%64	15.1%60	26.5%40	50.4%48	63.3%26	20.3%72	27.8%52
Noah Ross	635	1,013	38.6%	4.254	114.464	110.340	49.7%42	34.7%66	13.4%72	27.3%42	49.5%54	66.1%38	15.6%42	30.1%46
Nolan Hodge	608	1,040	36.9%	-2.042	110.152	112.136	49.3%40	33.4%62	15.1%60	27.6%44	52.0%42	64.8%32	18.2%58	34.2%34
Shemar Rathan-Mayes	356	1,292	21.6%	-3.940	111.656	115.428	49.8%42	33.5%62	16.0%52	33.8%60	51.4%44	60.6%18	18.1%58	38.9%24
Eric Van Der Heijden	283	1,366	17.1%	-1.144	117.570	118.622	50.7%48	33.3%62	12.4%78	28.6%46	52.6%38	64.6%32	14.8%34	32.7%38
Nick Farrar	248	1,400	15.1%	-17.720	102.434	120.020	46.9%32	26.6%34	12.9%76	25.1%36	58.6%16	66.2%38	17.7%56	29.8%46
Ahmard Harvey	209	1,439	12.7%	13.770	121.778	108.046	49.3%40	46.8%96	14.9%62	24.9%36	49.7%54	61.5%22	19.9%70	33.9%34

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Trazarien White	1,245	403	75.5%	-1.544	107.948	109.442	48.0%36	35.8%70	16.6%48	23.9%32	49.9%54	64.8%32	17.7%54	31.8%40
Shykeim Phillips	1,119	529	67.9%	-9.730	109.552	119.222	47.6%34	35.5%70	15.5%56	26.4%40	53.8%34	61.2%20	16.6%48	32.9%38
KJ Jenkins	1,078	571	65.4%	2.852	110.654	107.846	49.1%40	32.1%56	14.4%66	30.2%52	50.8%48	66.6%38	19.9%70	37.5%26
Donovan Newby	963	685	58.4%	0.748	114.964	114.232	51.4%52	33.5%62	13.6%70	29.9%50	52.1%40	61.6%22	18.0%58	30.9%44
Maleeck Harden-Hayes	806	843	48.9%	8.260	117.370	109.044	51.6%52	35.4%70	13.4%72	26.9%40	50.5%48	65.9%36	17.4%54	28.2%52
Khamari McGriff	684	964	41.5%	-0.146	117.370	117.424	49.5%42	33.7%64	12.1%80	37.1%68	53.8%34	65.2%34	15.9%42	35.3%32
Noah Ross	635	1,013	38.6%	2.050	116.670	114.630	50.8%48	33.6%62	13.3%72	36.2%66	54.3%32	63.3%26	19.1%64	33.5%34
Nolan Hodge	608	1,040	36.9%	5.656	119.174	113.432	51.0%50	34.4%64	12.3%78	35.7%66	52.6%38	64.3%30	17.5%54	31.0%42
Shemar Rathan-Mayes	356	1,292	21.6%	4.754	116.970	112.336	50.5%48	34.2%64	12.6%76	32.4%58	52.7%38	65.7%36	17.7%54	30.2%44
Eric Van Der Heijden	283	1,366	17.1%	3.652	115.466	111.836	50.3%46	34.2%64	13.5%70	33.6%60	52.4%40	64.4%32	18.4%60	32.0%40
Nick Farrar	248	1,400	15.1%	6.458	118.172	111.736	51.0%48	35.3%70	13.4%72	34.0%62	51.3%46	64.1%30	17.8%56	32.6%38
Ahmard Harvey	209	1,439	12.7%	1.248	114.964	113.732	50.5%48	31.9%56	13.1%74	34.0%62	52.8%38	64.9%34	17.5%54	31.9%40

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.

UNC WilmingtonUNCW18-10

ON/OFF Difference

Player ON

Player OFF

UNC Wilmington18-10