Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
UT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoUT Arlington logoUT Arlington logo

UT Arlington16-14

WACCoach: K.T. Turner

16-14NET#180

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcell McCreary+11.488+8.890−2.664+3.182−2.728−4.796−7.614+0.742+1.364+1.780−9.690
Raysean Seamster+6.474+7.086+0.746+6.396+4.488+2.316+2.466+2.820+2.172+0.152−2.262
Cash Chavis+0.552+4.174+3.628+2.072−1.834−3.592−5.124+2.424−1.336+2.992+5.420
Bahsil Laster+18.898+6.986−11.994−0.248+1.466−0.150+22.0100−7.796+1.364+0.764+8.312
Marcus Rigsby Jr.−18.76−10.410+8.310−2.228−2.032+1.524−11.26+3.416+0.354−1.822+4.724
Tyran Mason−6.826−0.150+6.714−0.150−2.330+0.738+8.190−0.858−5.98−1.426+9.98
Cameron Jackson−3.538−2.138+1.440+1.566+1.466+0.640−7.714+5.08+7.698−2.614−10.994
Jordan Lowery−3.936−5.522−1.658−4.514+2.172+2.216+4.676−1.768−2.228−1.822−6.380
Miles Goodman−16.08−11.76+4.324−5.58−9.22−0.862−5.024−0.858−6.36+0.560+2.336
Amari Reed+21.498+7.788−13.696+3.080+8.998+0.834−0.550−5.792+0.960+3.996+2.236
Jayden Smoot−5.530−0.448+5.122−1.634+1.870+0.344−4.030+3.316+3.382−1.526−8.288

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcell McCreary3.050101.73098.87048.0%3034.8%6819.5%2440.7%6847.9%6470.2%5018.6%6837.8%34
Raysean Seamster1.748101.32899.66848.8%3436.7%7621.2%1643.1%7248.4%6270.4%5218.2%6639.6%30
Cash Chavis0.346100.928100.66647.9%3034.9%6819.5%2440.9%6848.5%6269.4%4619.2%7242.0%26
Bahsil Laster10.062103.13293.28047.1%2836.2%7420.6%1854.5%8643.6%8270.6%5218.6%6844.5%20
Marcus Rigsby Jr.-10.72893.516104.25846.0%2434.4%6821.5%1436.1%5849.7%5870.1%5017.2%5842.9%24
Tyran Mason-4.03899.526103.56047.2%2834.1%6621.1%1647.4%8047.2%6866.4%3217.3%6046.1%18
Cameron Jackson-2.04298.222100.26848.1%3036.3%7421.0%1637.9%6250.7%5274.6%6816.7%5433.6%44
Jordan Lowery-2.34296.12098.47244.4%1836.7%7622.0%1245.4%7646.7%7068.6%4417.1%5836.3%38
Miles Goodman-11.02891.412102.46243.4%1629.2%4820.1%2039.0%6447.2%6865.6%3218.5%6841.7%26
Amari Reed16.072105.33689.38649.4%3642.1%9021.2%1642.1%7043.5%8270.5%5221.1%8041.8%26
Jayden Smoot-4.33899.224103.56045.9%2437.0%7620.9%1639.2%6450.3%5272.6%6217.0%5633.5%44

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Marcell McCreary-8.43293.014101.46644.9%2037.6%7824.2%648.2%8047.2%6868.9%4416.9%5647.3%18
Raysean Seamster-4.63894.31698.97042.6%1432.3%6018.9%2640.7%6845.6%7468.3%4218.1%6441.8%26
Cash Chavis-0.24696.82097.07445.9%2436.7%7623.0%846.0%7646.1%7270.7%5216.2%5036.6%38
Bahsil Laster-8.83296.320105.15647.3%2834.9%6820.7%1832.5%4851.3%4869.2%4617.9%6236.3%38
Marcus Rigsby Jr.8.060103.93495.97648.2%3236.4%7420.0%2047.2%7846.3%7269.8%4819.0%7038.2%34
Tyran Mason2.95099.62696.77447.3%2836.4%7420.4%1839.4%6448.0%6472.3%6018.8%7036.2%38
Cameron Jackson1.548100.42698.97046.6%2634.9%6820.4%1845.6%7645.7%7467.0%3819.2%7244.5%20
Jordan Lowery1.648101.628100.06848.9%3434.7%6819.8%2240.8%6848.4%6270.8%5218.9%7042.6%24
Miles Goodman5.054103.13298.17248.9%3438.4%8020.9%1644.0%7447.9%6471.9%5818.1%6439.4%30
Amari Reed-5.43697.522102.96246.4%2433.2%6220.4%1842.6%7049.1%5869.7%4817.2%5839.6%30
Jayden Smoot1.24899.62698.47247.6%2835.2%7020.6%1843.3%7247.1%6869.3%4618.5%6841.8%26
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.