Southland

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14NET#100Avg NET Rank, last 5 seasons: #254

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marvin McGhee III	1,532	578	72.6%	−9.3—	−5.8—	+3.4—	−4.0—	−8.0—	−3.0—	−7.9—	+0.8—	+2.7—	−4.2—	−5.3—
Koree Cotton	1,414	696	67.0%	+9.0—	+3.3—	−5.8—	+0.8—	−3.8—	−1.9—	+4.2—	−2.8—	+3.1—	−0.0—	−3.0—
Jaylen Washington	1,369	741	64.9%	+9.2—	+10.5—	+1.3—	+1.7—	+1.3—	−3.3—	+7.4—	+2.5—	+0.9—	+2.6—	+2.1—
Filip Brankovic	1,235	875	58.5%	+0.6—	+1.8—	+1.1—	−1.2—	−3.2—	−3.8—	−2.2—	+0.6—	+2.9—	−1.5—	−12.8—
Julien Gomez	1,156	953	54.8%	+0.7—	+4.1—	+3.4—	+2.0—	+0.1—	−0.6—	+1.5—	+1.4—	−1.8—	+1.6—	+3.3—
Zae Blake	925	1,185	43.9%	−4.4—	−7.5—	−3.1—	−2.1—	+0.8—	+2.3—	+2.1—	−2.1—	−2.3—	−0.4—	−0.3—
Always Wright	812	1,298	38.5%	−8.0—	−7.1—	+1.0—	−2.1—	+1.4—	+2.6—	−4.0—	−1.6—	−1.1—	−2.6—	−1.7—
Dane Christensen	599	1,511	28.4%	−6.2—	+0.7—	+6.9—	+2.6—	+1.1—	+0.6—	−5.7—	+3.7—	−2.7—	+0.9—	+7.1—
Kwo Agwa	504	1,606	23.9%	−4.5—	−6.8—	−2.2—	+1.5—	−2.0—	+4.4—	−2.6—	−1.4—	−3.6—	+0.1—	−2.5—
Jalen Ricks	265	1,845	12.6%	−1.6—	−4.9—	−3.3—	−2.6—	+6.0—	+5.0—	−3.3—	−3.5—	−1.5—	+1.0—	+1.7—
Demarris Winters	249	1,860	11.8%	+14.0—	+5.9—	−8.1—	+3.6—	+5.9—	+0.2—	−0.5—	−2.5—	+1.7—	−0.7—	+16.3—
Marshal Destremau	242	1,868	11.5%	+5.9—	+3.4—	−2.6—	−2.5—	+8.1—	+1.3—	+8.9—	−0.7—	−3.4—	+4.5—	+13.6—
Kye Dickson	186	1,924	8.8%	−7.7—	−0.3—	+7.3—	+0.6—	−2.4—	+0.0—	+4.1—	+9.8—	+5.6—	+2.6—	−3.0—

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marvin McGhee III	1,532	578	72.6%	8.2—	109.8—	101.7—	54.5%—	28.0%—	17.4%—	26.1%—	46.9%—	69.4%—	15.2%—	35.5%—
Koree Cotton	1,414	696	67.0%	13.7—	112.5—	98.8—	55.9%—	28.8%—	17.6%—	29.7%—	45.8%—	69.6%—	16.4%—	36.0%—
Jaylen Washington	1,369	741	64.9%	14.0—	115.1—	101.2—	56.2%—	30.6%—	17.1%—	30.8%—	47.6%—	69.0%—	17.3%—	37.7%—
Filip Brankovic	1,235	875	58.5%	11.0—	112.2—	101.2—	55.1%—	28.7%—	16.7%—	27.4%—	47.0%—	69.9%—	15.7%—	31.5%—
Julien Gomez	1,156	953	54.8%	11.0—	113.3—	102.2—	56.5%—	30.1%—	18.0%—	28.9%—	47.3%—	67.8%—	17.1%—	38.5%—
Zae Blake	925	1,185	43.9%	8.3—	107.2—	99.0—	54.5%—	30.5%—	19.6%—	29.5%—	45.5%—	67.4%—	16.1%—	36.8%—
Always Wright	812	1,298	38.5%	5.8—	107.1—	101.3—	54.3%—	30.9%—	19.8%—	25.8%—	45.7%—	68.0%—	14.8%—	35.9%—
Dane Christensen	599	1,511	28.4%	6.4—	112.0—	105.6—	57.4%—	30.9%—	18.7%—	24.2%—	49.3%—	66.7%—	17.1%—	42.0%—
Kwo Agwa	504	1,606	23.9%	7.2—	106.3—	99.0—	56.8%—	28.6%—	21.6%—	26.2%—	45.7%—	66.0%—	16.5%—	35.1%—
Jalen Ricks	265	1,845	12.6%	9.3—	107.1—	97.8—	53.3%—	35.3%—	22.6%—	25.3%—	43.7%—	67.3%—	17.2%—	38.4%—
Demarris Winters	249	1,860	11.8%	23.1—	116.6—	93.6—	58.8%—	35.3%—	18.4%—	27.8%—	44.5%—	70.1%—	15.7%—	51.5%—
Marshal Destremau	242	1,868	11.5%	16.0—	114.4—	98.4—	53.4%—	37.2%—	19.4%—	36.1%—	46.0%—	65.6%—	20.3%—	49.0%—
Kye Dickson	186	1,924	8.8%	3.7—	111.1—	107.4—	56.2%—	27.9%—	18.3%—	32.0%—	55.7%—	73.8%—	18.8%—	34.2%—

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Marvin McGhee III	1,532	578	72.6%	17.4—	115.7—	98.2—	58.6%—	36.0%—	20.4%—	34.0%—	46.1%—	66.7%—	19.4%—	40.9%—
Koree Cotton	1,414	696	67.0%	4.6—	109.2—	104.6—	55.1%—	32.6%—	19.5%—	25.5%—	48.6%—	66.5%—	16.4%—	39.0%—
Jaylen Washington	1,369	741	64.9%	4.8—	104.6—	99.9—	54.5%—	29.2%—	20.4%—	23.4%—	45.1%—	68.1%—	14.7%—	35.6%—
Filip Brankovic	1,235	875	58.5%	10.3—	110.4—	100.1—	56.3%—	32.0%—	20.5%—	29.5%—	46.3%—	67.0%—	17.2%—	44.3%—
Julien Gomez	1,156	953	54.8%	10.3—	109.2—	98.8—	54.5%—	30.0%—	18.6%—	27.4%—	45.9%—	69.6%—	15.5%—	35.2%—
Zae Blake	925	1,185	43.9%	12.7—	114.7—	102.0—	56.5%—	29.7%—	17.2%—	27.3%—	47.6%—	69.7%—	16.6%—	37.1%—
Always Wright	812	1,298	38.5%	13.8—	114.1—	100.3—	56.4%—	29.5%—	17.3%—	29.8%—	47.3%—	69.1%—	17.4%—	37.6%—
Dane Christensen	599	1,511	28.4%	12.5—	111.2—	98.7—	54.9%—	29.8%—	18.1%—	29.9%—	45.7%—	69.4%—	16.1%—	35.0%—
Kwo Agwa	504	1,606	23.9%	11.8—	113.0—	101.3—	55.3%—	30.6%—	17.2%—	28.9%—	47.1%—	69.6%—	16.4%—	37.6%—
Jalen Ricks	265	1,845	12.6%	10.9—	112.0—	101.1—	56.0%—	29.3%—	17.6%—	28.7%—	47.1%—	68.8%—	16.3%—	36.8%—
Demarris Winters	249	1,860	11.8%	9.1—	110.7—	101.6—	55.2%—	29.4%—	18.2%—	28.3%—	47.0%—	68.4%—	16.5%—	35.2%—
Marshal Destremau	242	1,868	11.5%	10.0—	111.0—	101.0—	55.9%—	29.1%—	18.1%—	27.2%—	46.8%—	69.0%—	15.8%—	35.5%—
Kye Dickson	186	1,924	8.8%	11.4—	111.5—	100.0—	55.6%—	30.3%—	18.2%—	27.9%—	45.9%—	68.2%—	16.2%—	37.2%—

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I rather than against team ratings — a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.