Utah St.26-7

MWCCoach: Danny Sprinkle

26-7NET#48

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Brown II	1,963	162	92.4%	−2.442	−8.912	−6.580	−6.26	−4.814	−2.884	+1.058	+0.840	+7.698	−0.444	−18.998
Great Osobor	1,812	313	85.3%	+10.986	−3.532	−14.496	+2.476	−3.422	+2.714	−2.140	−1.564	+6.996	+1.168	−28.398
Ian Martinez	1,643	482	77.3%	−2.740	+2.866	+5.522	−2.824	+5.590	−0.556	+6.684	+1.434	−0.250	−1.528	+1.042
Mason Falslev	1,423	702	67.0%	+2.660	+6.782	+4.128	+8.098	−2.232	−0.656	−13.04	+5.96	+0.454	+0.660	−9.088
Josh Uduje	1,238	887	58.3%	+5.470	+1.860	−3.668	−1.436	−1.834	−2.076	+14.698	−5.190	+1.162	−2.616	+4.724
Isaac Johnson	819	1,306	38.6%	−2.042	+2.262	+4.228	+4.490	−2.034	+0.640	−10.48	+3.020	+1.264	−1.528	+0.248
Javon Jackson	515	1,610	24.2%	−0.648	−4.130	−3.568	−1.338	−1.836	+2.020	+11.396	−3.280	−1.834	+1.674	+6.716
Kalifa Sakho	484	1,641	22.8%	−4.434	−0.150	+4.228	−4.016	+2.170	−1.774	+0.856	+1.334	−2.528	+0.356	+2.734
Max Agbonkpolo	366	1,759	17.2%	+8.480	−5.026	−13.596	−2.724	+3.882	+1.526	−6.618	−1.666	+5.894	+5.498	−1.456
Karson Templin	231	1,894	10.9%	−9.022	+0.754	+9.88	−0.842	+0.254	−0.964	−6.420	−2.776	−11.22	+0.560	+21.50

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Brown II	1,963	162	92.4%	9.062	114.864	105.752	53.2%60	31.9%56	15.8%54	38.4%70	49.7%54	70.0%54	16.9%50	29.1%48
Great Osobor	1,812	313	85.3%	10.866	114.964	104.156	54.0%64	31.8%54	16.4%50	38.0%70	49.5%54	70.4%56	17.1%50	26.5%56
Ian Martinez	1,643	482	77.3%	8.662	116.168	107.546	53.0%60	33.5%62	15.9%54	39.8%74	50.0%54	69.3%52	16.5%48	30.8%44
Mason Falslev	1,423	702	67.0%	10.164	117.672	107.646	56.2%72	31.5%54	15.8%54	34.1%62	51.6%44	69.5%52	17.1%52	27.6%54
Josh Uduje	1,238	887	58.3%	11.466	116.268	104.854	53.0%60	31.6%54	15.2%60	44.6%82	47.6%64	69.8%54	15.8%42	32.5%38
Isaac Johnson	819	1,306	38.6%	7.960	116.870	108.844	56.3%74	31.0%52	16.4%50	32.0%56	51.6%44	70.1%54	16.0%44	30.7%44
Javon Jackson	515	1,610	24.2%	8.762	112.358	103.658	52.6%58	31.0%52	17.5%42	47.0%84	47.2%64	68.0%46	18.1%58	35.7%30
Kalifa Sakho	484	1,641	22.8%	5.956	115.366	109.542	50.6%48	33.9%64	14.7%62	39.0%72	50.7%48	67.4%44	17.1%52	32.6%38
Max Agbonkpolo	366	1,759	17.2%	16.274	111.356	95.076	51.4%50	35.4%70	17.2%44	32.9%58	48.3%60	74.2%74	21.4%78	29.5%48
Karson Templin	231	1,894	10.9%	1.148	116.168	115.030	52.9%58	32.5%58	15.2%60	32.7%58	47.3%64	59.4%16	17.4%52	49.8%10

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Darius Brown II	1,963	162	92.4%	11.566	123.782	112.236	59.4%84	36.8%74	18.6%36	37.4%68	49.0%56	62.4%24	17.3%52	48.0%12
Great Osobor	1,812	313	85.3%	-0.046	118.572	118.522	51.6%52	35.2%68	13.7%70	40.1%74	50.9%46	63.5%28	15.9%44	54.9%8
Ian Martinez	1,643	482	77.3%	11.266	113.260	102.062	55.8%72	28.0%40	16.4%50	33.3%58	48.6%58	69.5%52	18.1%58	29.8%46
Mason Falslev	1,423	702	67.0%	7.460	111.054	103.558	48.2%36	33.8%64	16.4%50	47.1%84	45.7%72	69.1%50	16.5%46	36.7%28
Josh Uduje	1,238	887	58.3%	6.058	114.464	108.346	54.4%66	33.4%62	17.1%44	30.0%50	52.7%38	68.7%48	18.4%60	27.8%52
Isaac Johnson	819	1,306	38.6%	9.964	114.664	104.754	51.9%54	33.0%58	15.8%54	42.4%78	48.5%58	68.9%50	17.4%54	30.5%44
Javon Jackson	515	1,610	24.2%	9.362	116.468	107.148	53.9%64	32.8%58	15.5%56	35.8%66	50.5%48	69.8%54	16.5%46	28.9%48
Kalifa Sakho	484	1,641	22.8%	10.264	115.566	105.254	54.6%66	31.8%54	16.4%50	38.2%70	49.4%54	69.9%54	16.8%48	30.0%46
Max Agbonkpolo	366	1,759	17.2%	7.860	116.368	108.544	54.1%64	31.6%54	15.7%54	39.5%72	49.9%54	68.4%48	16.0%44	30.8%44
Karson Templin	231	1,894	10.9%	10.264	115.466	105.254	53.7%62	32.3%56	16.1%52	39.1%72	50.0%54	70.7%58	16.8%50	28.3%50

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,787 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.