Beyond the ArcBeyond the Arc
Utah St. logoUtah St. logoUtah St. logoUtah St. logo

Utah St.28-7

MWCCoach: Ben Jacobson

28-7NET#26

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players
Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Mason Falslev+1.054−7.816−8.890−5.78−5.212−0.964+0.152−3.280+6.596+0.356−1.962
MJ Collins Jr.+24.0100+15.3100−8.790+3.384+6.996−4.596−1.642−2.676−2.426+5.2100+2.634
Drake Allen+5.974+9.792+3.828+2.880−0.546−3.090+3.772+4.212−0.346+2.790+3.330
Karson Templin+6.074+2.564−3.570−1.634+0.658−1.978+8.590−2.474+4.390−2.316+12.34
Adlan Elamin−0.848+2.464+3.132+2.476+0.052+0.736−9.110+3.018−4.314+2.082−9.490
Kolby King−6.228−1.144+5.022+1.870−4.514+0.738+10.294+1.334+1.566−3.56+2.236
Garry Clark+1.958−2.736−4.674−0.150+7.096+2.018+5.982−5.292−0.346+0.356+1.342
Elijah Perryman−5.132−10.210−5.176−1.734+0.152+4.62−5.822−3.282+1.062−1.330−5.176
Zach Keller−8.520−6.818+1.738+0.960−7.44+1.722−7.116+1.928−1.634+0.968−10.592
Tucker Anderson−12.412−6.120+6.316−5.010+0.152−0.658−3.632+3.316−2.030−0.640+4.326
Jordy Barnes−4.832+6.584+11.34−2.128+4.688−1.978−7.914+2.028−2.130−4.84+2.634

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Mason Falslev14.670117.066102.46255.0%6231.6%5815.0%5639.0%6448.9%6068.3%4220.1%7638.7%32
MJ Collins Jr.19.878121.976102.16456.7%7034.1%6614.1%6238.6%6248.9%6066.6%3221.2%8239.6%30
Drake Allen16.674122.076105.55457.1%7232.4%6014.0%6440.4%6651.1%5067.0%3821.0%8040.3%28
Karson Templin17.574119.772102.26255.2%6432.9%6214.2%6243.3%7248.2%6469.4%4618.8%7045.5%20
Adlan Elamin14.068119.672105.75457.2%7232.6%6015.5%5234.2%5251.0%5064.8%2821.1%8234.2%44
Kolby King11.164117.868106.75257.0%7230.1%5215.5%5244.6%7450.2%5267.9%4018.2%6440.2%28
Garry Clark15.572116.766101.26656.0%6636.9%7616.4%4442.6%7046.3%7066.9%3820.2%7639.8%30
Elijah Perryman11.064111.752100.76654.9%6232.6%6018.2%3235.1%5447.4%6667.7%4019.2%7235.8%40
Zach Keller8.860113.958105.15456.6%7027.6%4016.3%4634.2%5250.7%5266.1%3220.6%7832.2%48
Tucker Anderson4.454113.558109.14652.0%4832.6%6014.7%5836.1%5852.2%4465.5%3019.6%7442.5%24
Jordy Barnes9.962124.682114.73254.1%5836.9%7613.4%6831.5%4651.4%4865.2%3015.5%4441.5%26

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

EfficiencyFour FactorsOpponent
Mason Falslev13.668124.882111.24060.6%8436.8%7615.9%4838.9%6452.1%4461.7%1819.8%7440.6%28
MJ Collins Jr.-4.238106.640110.84253.4%5427.2%3818.6%2840.2%6651.5%4869.0%4616.0%4837.0%36
Drake Allen10.764112.354101.66454.2%5832.9%6217.1%4036.7%5847.0%6867.3%3818.4%6637.0%36
Karson Templin11.566117.266105.75456.8%7032.3%6016.1%4634.9%5450.6%5265.1%3021.1%8233.3%46
Adlan Elamin14.770117.366102.56254.9%6232.6%6014.8%5843.4%7248.1%6469.1%4619.1%7043.6%22
Kolby King17.374118.970101.66455.2%6434.7%6814.8%5834.4%5248.9%6066.4%3221.7%8438.0%34
Garry Clark13.668119.472105.85456.0%6829.9%5014.4%6236.7%5851.5%4867.2%3819.9%7638.5%32
Elijah Perryman16.172121.976105.85456.6%7032.5%6013.6%6640.9%6850.7%5266.8%3820.5%7840.8%28
Zach Keller17.374120.774103.46055.7%6635.0%7014.6%6041.4%6848.8%6067.7%3819.7%7442.8%24
Tucker Anderson16.874119.672102.86257.0%7232.5%6015.3%5439.7%6648.9%6067.5%3820.1%7638.2%34
Jordy Barnes14.670118.168103.46056.1%6832.3%6015.3%5439.4%6449.4%5867.2%3820.3%7838.9%32
How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (4,026 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.