Utah Valley23-9

WACCoach: Todd Phillips

23-9NET#103

Net Rtg, on the floor minus off it. Players with 100 possessions each way

Players

Columns

ON/OFF Difference

How the team's numbers change with each player on the floor. Ranked against every qualifying player in Division I.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominick Nelson	1,585	495	76.2%	+2.058	+0.152	−1.960	−1.138	−0.844	−0.658	+8.490	+0.742	+4.890	−4.06	−20.298
Tanner Toolson	1,520	561	73.0%	+2.460	+2.766	+0.348	+1.364	−0.646	−1.876	+2.566	+2.424	+2.676	−1.428	−5.678
Trevan Leonhardt	1,473	608	70.8%	+9.984	+5.780	−4.272	+2.880	+1.666	−0.556	−3.034	+1.830	+5.292	+1.678	−3.770
Carter Welling	1,242	839	59.7%	+10.886	+3.268	−7.584	+2.072	+1.364	+0.246	−0.848	−4.086	−1.042	+1.272	−4.372
Osiris Grady	860	1,221	41.3%	−14.310	−12.46	+1.938	−3.120	−4.018	+3.110	−14.72	+3.318	+4.288	−2.614	−17.798
Kylin Green	741	1,339	35.6%	−10.018	−3.732	+6.318	−2.030	−1.438	+1.428	+4.978	−1.464	−4.614	−1.922	+6.916
Ethan Potter	700	1,381	33.6%	−0.150	+2.566	+2.634	+1.466	−0.348	+0.836	+0.052	+1.434	+4.186	−2.416	−0.150
Jackson Holcombe	691	1,390	33.2%	+14.092	+7.686	−6.482	+1.972	+2.170	−2.988	+9.492	−5.694	−3.320	+1.778	+6.616
Hayden Welling	609	1,471	29.3%	−16.08	−5.126	+10.96	−3.220	−1.240	−0.760	−2.636	+5.84	−4.414	+1.878	+11.46
Cory Wells	593	1,488	28.5%	−4.136	−5.124	−1.054	−2.426	+3.682	+3.38	+8.690	−1.668	−3.320	+4.598	+20.00
Noah Taitz	373	1,708	17.9%	+7.780	+6.784	−1.054	+2.878	−1.438	−3.994	−13.84	−2.978	−5.78	+2.182	+9.58

Player ON

What the team did while each player was on the floor.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominick Nelson	1,585	495	76.2%	8.262	109.150	100.966	50.2%46	34.0%62	17.6%42	42.8%78	47.8%64	72.0%64	16.3%44	27.5%56
Tanner Toolson	1,520	561	73.0%	8.462	109.852	101.564	50.8%46	34.0%64	17.2%44	41.4%76	48.3%62	71.6%62	16.9%48	30.5%46
Trevan Leonhardt	1,473	608	70.8%	10.664	110.854	100.168	51.2%48	34.7%66	17.6%42	39.9%74	48.2%62	72.4%66	17.8%54	30.9%44
Carter Welling	1,242	839	59.7%	12.168	110.452	98.370	51.2%48	34.7%66	17.8%40	40.4%74	46.0%70	70.4%56	17.8%56	30.3%46
Osiris Grady	860	1,221	41.3%	-0.746	101.832	102.562	48.6%36	31.8%54	19.5%28	32.1%56	49.5%56	73.3%70	15.8%40	22.0%72
Kylin Green	741	1,339	35.6%	1.350	106.744	105.454	49.1%38	33.3%58	18.6%36	43.9%80	46.8%68	67.9%44	16.1%42	36.5%30
Ethan Potter	700	1,381	33.6%	7.760	110.854	103.160	51.4%50	34.0%62	18.3%38	40.8%76	48.6%60	73.6%72	15.7%40	32.0%42
Jackson Holcombe	691	1,390	33.2%	17.176	114.262	97.074	51.7%52	35.6%68	15.8%56	47.0%84	43.8%78	68.7%48	18.4%60	36.5%30
Hayden Welling	609	1,471	29.3%	-3.542	105.540	109.044	48.2%34	33.3%62	17.2%44	39.0%72	51.7%44	67.7%44	18.5%60	40.2%24
Cory Wells	593	1,488	28.5%	4.856	105.440	100.766	48.7%36	36.7%72	20.1%26	47.0%84	46.4%68	68.5%48	20.4%72	46.5%14
Noah Taitz	373	1,708	17.9%	14.070	114.662	100.666	52.7%56	33.0%58	14.5%66	29.6%48	45.3%74	66.2%38	19.0%64	39.9%24

Player OFF

What the team did while each player sat.

	Possessions			Efficiency			Four Factors				Opponent

Dominick Nelson	1,585	495	76.2%	6.258	109.050	102.860	51.3%48	34.8%66	18.2%38	34.4%62	47.1%66	67.2%42	20.3%72	47.8%14
Tanner Toolson	1,520	561	73.0%	6.058	107.244	101.264	49.5%40	34.6%64	19.1%32	38.9%72	45.9%72	68.9%50	18.3%58	36.1%32
Trevan Leonhardt	1,473	608	70.8%	0.748	105.140	104.356	48.4%34	33.0%58	18.1%38	42.9%78	46.4%70	67.2%42	16.1%42	34.6%36
Carter Welling	1,242	839	59.7%	1.350	107.244	105.852	49.2%38	33.4%62	17.6%42	41.2%76	50.0%54	71.4%60	16.6%46	34.6%36
Osiris Grady	860	1,221	41.3%	13.670	114.262	100.666	51.7%52	35.8%70	16.5%50	46.8%84	46.2%70	69.1%50	18.4%60	39.7%24
Kylin Green	741	1,339	35.6%	11.366	110.452	99.170	51.1%48	34.7%66	17.2%44	39.1%72	48.1%62	72.5%66	18.0%56	29.5%48
Ethan Potter	700	1,381	33.6%	7.760	108.248	100.566	50.0%40	34.3%64	17.5%44	40.7%76	47.2%66	69.5%52	18.1%58	32.1%42
Jackson Holcombe	691	1,390	33.2%	3.152	106.644	103.558	49.8%40	33.5%62	18.7%34	37.6%70	49.5%56	72.0%64	16.7%46	29.9%48
Hayden Welling	609	1,471	29.3%	12.468	110.652	98.172	51.4%50	34.6%64	17.9%40	41.5%76	46.0%70	72.1%64	16.8%46	28.7%52
Cory Wells	593	1,488	28.5%	8.962	110.652	101.764	51.1%48	33.1%58	16.8%48	38.4%70	48.1%62	71.8%62	16.0%42	26.6%58
Noah Taitz	373	1,708	17.9%	6.358	107.946	101.664	49.9%40	34.4%64	18.4%36	43.4%80	48.1%62	71.9%64	16.9%48	30.4%46

How to read this

An on/off split is not a rating of the player. It is what the team did with him on the floor and with him off it, which also carries whoever replaced him, whoever he played alongside, and who the opponent had out there at the time. Two players on the same team can trade the same minutes and both look good, or both look bad, for reasons neither controls.

Players need 100 possessions both on and off the floor to appear. Both sides, not either: a starter who never sits has no off-court sample, and his difference would be the team measured against nothing.

In ON/OFF Difference, percentage columns are shown as points of difference, and each row is ranked against every qualifying player in Division I (3,990 of them) rather than against team ratings: a +7 net rating is a good lineup, a +7 net swing is an enormous one. Player ON and Player OFF are ranked against Division I five-man units instead, because those are ordinary team rates.

Sorting any of the three tables reorders all three, so a player stays on the same line throughout.